Sir?
-
This post did not contain any content.
reminder to never submit to a field sobriety test, as you are at the whom of the officer conducting it, and as we all know, acab
also if you drive under the influence or are fucking around with your touchscreen dash or phone or something, fuck you
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
That cop smells like Axe body spray and day old cigarette butts.
-
reminder to never submit to a field sobriety test, as you are at the whom of the officer conducting it, and as we all know, acab
also if you drive under the influence or are fucking around with your touchscreen dash or phone or something, fuck you
I drove trucks for a while and the amount of people with screens on is rediculous and that not counting the amount eating and putting on makeup.
-
You’re never gonna keep me down.
I'm imagining this being yelled from the ground as the man is being cuffed
-
Or fingerprints, or lie detectors..
There's no scientific backing to fingerprints? Whaat
-
There's no scientific backing to fingerprints? Whaat
No, there's no scientific backing to really confidently say that no two fingerprints are alike. That doesn't change that we can identify them and match them.
If you observe that fingerprints can be matched, that's all you need to know.
Now lie detectors don't work at all...
-
Fun fact there is literally no scientific backing to field sobriety tests. In fact there is a lot of scientific evidence proving they don’t work.
Yeah, why not use a breath analyzer or something. I am a drunk and could do those test really wasted.
-
Yeah, why not use a breath analyzer or something. I am a drunk and could do those test really wasted.
Because it’s harder for cops to discriminate against dark skinned people if they use objective measurements.
-
Because it’s harder for cops to discriminate against dark skinned people if they use objective measurements.
Breath analyzers aren't exactly accurate. There's a bunch of things that can give them false positives, they often aren't properly calibrated, and the science behind them is kinda shaky. They got challenged often enough in certain states that in at least one state if an officer has you breathe in a machine and that machine produces a number higher than the legal BAC limit, that's proof of DUI regardless of what the machine may or may not do to result in that number.
-
No, there's no scientific backing to really confidently say that no two fingerprints are alike. That doesn't change that we can identify them and match them.
If you observe that fingerprints can be matched, that's all you need to know.
Now lie detectors don't work at all...
Now lie detectors don’t work at all…
Meh, they do work. They just measure stress response, not truthfulness. The idea being that you'll have a heightened stress response to a question you are lying about the answer to, which may or may not be accurate depending on individual and situation.
-
Now lie detectors don’t work at all…
Meh, they do work. They just measure stress response, not truthfulness. The idea being that you'll have a heightened stress response to a question you are lying about the answer to, which may or may not be accurate depending on individual and situation.
So they don't work. They're nothing more than pseudo-science gobbled up by "Truth, Justice, And The American Way" boomers who also watch NCIS and cheer when they blow up the bad guys on the big screen.
