UK Court Rejects Government Secrecy in Apple's Fight Against Backdoor Request.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
Big Brother Watch, Open Rights Group and Index on Censorship made a submission to the court, arguing against proceedings taking in place in secret and in favour of open justice. Today, the Tribunal has rejected the Home Office’s application, stating it did not accept “that the revelation of the bare details of the case would be damaging to the public interest or prejudicial to national security”.
Neither myself nor, I'm assuming, the person you're replying to wants to have the government with their grubby little fingers in our data.
What the person you're replying to was saying had literally nothing to do with what you asked. Has to do with the above. It's shocking that a UK court actually made a sane call. In this case, they decided that no, the government wasn't entitled to a closed case. That the proceedings would be open, and the details would be available to the public. Like in a functioning democracy.Thanks, but your wasting your time. I've got some trolls trying to provoke arguments with me recently.
-
Thanks, but your wasting your time. I've got some trolls trying to provoke arguments with me recently.
Eh, it happens. If that was an honest attempt to troll....kids these days need to up their fucking game.
-
Eh, it happens. If that was an honest attempt to troll....kids these days need to up their fucking game.
Kids these days have very low reading comprehension due to not reading much long form "content" IMHO
-
Do you?
Where is this right enshrined?
I'm asking because you seem to believe that such a right exists, where I'm observing that the political leadership across the planet seems to be heading in the opposite direction at an alarming rate.
-
Do you?
Where is this right enshrined?
I'm asking because you seem to believe that such a right exists, where I'm observing that the political leadership across the planet seems to be heading in the opposite direction at an alarming rate.
It’s not enshrined anywhere but it should be covered under the Humans Rights Act of 1998 in the UK that outlines what constitutes the right to privacy. Since this Backdoor request has the potential to conflict with privacy rights, not only us the public but many people who work on these issues should be given access.
-
It’s not enshrined anywhere but it should be covered under the Humans Rights Act of 1998 in the UK that outlines what constitutes the right to privacy. Since this Backdoor request has the potential to conflict with privacy rights, not only us the public but many people who work on these issues should be given access.
A right to privacy is not at all the same as the right to know, in many cases it's the exact opposite.
-
A right to privacy is not at all the same as the right to know, in many cases it's the exact opposite.
-
Kids these days have very low reading comprehension due to not reading much long form "content" IMHO
It's not having any downtime imho. The instant they're done reading something it's trivial to find something else to trigger your pleasure centres, so unless you do it through deliberate intention, you'll never have time to sit and consider what you've read.
-
Do you?
Where is this right enshrined?
I'm asking because you seem to believe that such a right exists, where I'm observing that the political leadership across the planet seems to be heading in the opposite direction at an alarming rate.
'Political leadership' doesn't define reality. People are completely justified to assert rights even if they aren't expressly approved by big daddy g'vmt.
-
System shared this topic
