Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Linux
  3. Which Distribution and Desktop Environment should I use?

Which Distribution and Desktop Environment should I use?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Linux
linux
67 Posts 39 Posters 270 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T [email protected]

    Background: I am a lifelong Windows user who is planning to move to Linux in October, once Microsoft drops support for Windows 10. I use a particularly bad laptop (Intel Celeron N3060, 4 GB DDR3 RAM, 64 GB eMMC storage).

    I do have some degree of terminal experience in Windows, but I would not count on it. If there are defaults that are sensible enough, I'd appreciate it. I can also configure through mouse-based text editors, as long as there is reliable, concise documentation on that app.

    So, here's what I want in a distro and desktop environment:

    • Easy to install, maintain (graphical installation and, preferably, package management too + auto-updating for non-critical applications)
    • Lightwight and snappy (around 800 MB idle RAM usage, 10-16 GB storage usage in a base install)
    • Secure (using Wayland, granular GUI-based permission control)

    I have narrowed down the distributions and desktop environments that seem promisimg, but want y'all's opinions on them.

    Distributions:

    • Linux Mint: Easy to install, not prone to randomly break (problems: high OOTB storage usage, RAM consumption seems a little too high, kind of outdated packages, not on Wayland yet)
    • Fedora: Secure, the main DEs use Wayland (problems: similar to above except for the outdated packages; also hard to install and maintain, from what I have heard)
    • antiX Linux (problems: outdated packages, too barebones)

    Desktop Environments:

    • XFCE: Lightweight, fast, seems like it'd work how I want (problems: not on Wayland yet, that's it)
    • labwc + other Wayland stuff: Lightweight, fast, secure (problems: likely harder to install, especially since I have no Linux terminal experience, cannot configure through a GUI)

    In advance, I thank you all for helping me!

    I appreciate any help, especially in things like:

    • Neofetch screenshots, to showcase idle RAM usage on some DEs
    • Experiences with some distributions
    H This user is from outside of this forum
    H This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #61

    I would recommend slackware or devuan with xfce or lxde

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T [email protected]

      Background: I am a lifelong Windows user who is planning to move to Linux in October, once Microsoft drops support for Windows 10. I use a particularly bad laptop (Intel Celeron N3060, 4 GB DDR3 RAM, 64 GB eMMC storage).

      I do have some degree of terminal experience in Windows, but I would not count on it. If there are defaults that are sensible enough, I'd appreciate it. I can also configure through mouse-based text editors, as long as there is reliable, concise documentation on that app.

      So, here's what I want in a distro and desktop environment:

      • Easy to install, maintain (graphical installation and, preferably, package management too + auto-updating for non-critical applications)
      • Lightwight and snappy (around 800 MB idle RAM usage, 10-16 GB storage usage in a base install)
      • Secure (using Wayland, granular GUI-based permission control)

      I have narrowed down the distributions and desktop environments that seem promisimg, but want y'all's opinions on them.

      Distributions:

      • Linux Mint: Easy to install, not prone to randomly break (problems: high OOTB storage usage, RAM consumption seems a little too high, kind of outdated packages, not on Wayland yet)
      • Fedora: Secure, the main DEs use Wayland (problems: similar to above except for the outdated packages; also hard to install and maintain, from what I have heard)
      • antiX Linux (problems: outdated packages, too barebones)

      Desktop Environments:

      • XFCE: Lightweight, fast, seems like it'd work how I want (problems: not on Wayland yet, that's it)
      • labwc + other Wayland stuff: Lightweight, fast, secure (problems: likely harder to install, especially since I have no Linux terminal experience, cannot configure through a GUI)

      In advance, I thank you all for helping me!

      I appreciate any help, especially in things like:

      • Neofetch screenshots, to showcase idle RAM usage on some DEs
      • Experiences with some distributions
      N This user is from outside of this forum
      N This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #62
      What do you prefer? Linux allows multiple desktops to be installed. I use Mate primarily but I also have lxde installed as a backup in case something breaks.
      T 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T [email protected]

        Background: I am a lifelong Windows user who is planning to move to Linux in October, once Microsoft drops support for Windows 10. I use a particularly bad laptop (Intel Celeron N3060, 4 GB DDR3 RAM, 64 GB eMMC storage).

        I do have some degree of terminal experience in Windows, but I would not count on it. If there are defaults that are sensible enough, I'd appreciate it. I can also configure through mouse-based text editors, as long as there is reliable, concise documentation on that app.

        So, here's what I want in a distro and desktop environment:

        • Easy to install, maintain (graphical installation and, preferably, package management too + auto-updating for non-critical applications)
        • Lightwight and snappy (around 800 MB idle RAM usage, 10-16 GB storage usage in a base install)
        • Secure (using Wayland, granular GUI-based permission control)

        I have narrowed down the distributions and desktop environments that seem promisimg, but want y'all's opinions on them.

        Distributions:

        • Linux Mint: Easy to install, not prone to randomly break (problems: high OOTB storage usage, RAM consumption seems a little too high, kind of outdated packages, not on Wayland yet)
        • Fedora: Secure, the main DEs use Wayland (problems: similar to above except for the outdated packages; also hard to install and maintain, from what I have heard)
        • antiX Linux (problems: outdated packages, too barebones)

        Desktop Environments:

        • XFCE: Lightweight, fast, seems like it'd work how I want (problems: not on Wayland yet, that's it)
        • labwc + other Wayland stuff: Lightweight, fast, secure (problems: likely harder to install, especially since I have no Linux terminal experience, cannot configure through a GUI)

        In advance, I thank you all for helping me!

        I appreciate any help, especially in things like:

        • Neofetch screenshots, to showcase idle RAM usage on some DEs
        • Experiences with some distributions
        N This user is from outside of this forum
        N This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #63
        I've had Fedora updates screw up so many times and spent way too many hours fixing mutually conflicting updates that I have really come to loath the OS. I keep a Fedora server running for my customers who are Redrat enthusiasts but Ubuntu is so much better behaved.
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N [email protected]
          What do you prefer? Linux allows multiple desktops to be installed. I use Mate primarily but I also have lxde installed as a backup in case something breaks.
          T This user is from outside of this forum
          T This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #64

          I prefer something that has the same functional layout as Windows, and is as lightweight as possible.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T [email protected]

            Yeah, it does feel like Windows XP, but that's also the beauty of it - I can customize it using the graphical editors, since the UI is not confusing, just outdated.

            O This user is from outside of this forum
            O This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #65

            I think XFCE Mint is a good experience.
            That said, depending on how W10 has been running for you, Cinnamon won't be worse than that.

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O [email protected]

              I think XFCE Mint is a good experience.
              That said, depending on how W10 has been running for you, Cinnamon won't be worse than that.

              T This user is from outside of this forum
              T This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #66

              Not that bad - the start menu opens in about 2 seconds, but some apps can take much longer (highly depends, but up to 6-10 seconds). I can easily work with a minimal, Windows 9x layout, if that means I will get a significant performance boost.

              O 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T [email protected]

                Not that bad - the start menu opens in about 2 seconds, but some apps can take much longer (highly depends, but up to 6-10 seconds). I can easily work with a minimal, Windows 9x layout, if that means I will get a significant performance boost.

                O This user is from outside of this forum
                O This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #67

                I think your assessment of Linux Mint with XFCE is a really good first choice. Cinnamon could be worth a try though as the UI is a bit more modern looking.
                I'm biased towards XFCE because it looks fine and runs extremely well on old laptops. I've got a laptop from 2008 running it and it's honestly a usable machine again.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • System shared this topic on
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • World
                • Users
                • Groups