no way right
-
Congress attack so they can just disband it?
They already tried that one.
Twice this week, yeah.
-
My parents' feeds are already getting flooded with videos about how evil and scary Iran is
manufacturing consent.
if you have no morals, it is a good time to invest in Raytheon
-
I'm pretty sure Americans are gobbling up the media narrative of "Iran has nukes and the girls aren't educated"
They don't educate the girls. that makes it ethical to nuke the girls.
Westoid warmongering logic
like in gaza where "they are mean to gays" so it is OK to genocide all the gays in there
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
The white house? Woth no designated survivor?
Pleasepleasepleasepleaseplease
Iran, I will let you murder me for the gay if you stop them from doing it.
hell i'm not gay and i'll let them murder me for the gay as blood payment in the scenario you describe. tbh i'm really not sure how murder politics works.
-
They don't educate the girls. that makes it ethical to nuke the girls.
Westoid warmongering logic
like in gaza where "they are mean to gays" so it is OK to genocide all the gays in there
I don't know why they're trying to push this narrative that Iran having nuclear weapons is somehow more bad for Western society than, for example, North Korea having nuclear weapons.
They're acting as if no hostile power has ever had nuclear weapons before.
-
hell i'm not gay and i'll let them murder me for the gay as blood payment in the scenario you describe. tbh i'm really not sure how murder politics works.
how murder politics works
I expect it gets messy.
-
No no that's Russia and Ukraine, which is Biden's fault.
This is Iran, which is also Biden's fault.
It's amazing that with how much power that he has that he wasn't able to rig an election.
-
The easiest attack to false-flag would be an automated drone attack against a stateside US military base. Remember that Ukraine Spiderweb drone attack from a few weeks back?
Ukraine built shipping containers with attack drones and retractable roofs. They contracted hapless Russian freight operators to deliver these shipping containers close to Russian air force bases. Then they remotely activated them, retracted the roofs, and had the drones take off to attack Russian airplanes just a few miles away.
This kind of attack would be trivially easy to false-flag. At least with a false flag in-person terrorist attack, there are people involved. You can dig into the backgrounds of the actual attackers and maybe uncover links to intelligence agencies.
But an automated drone attack? Just drop off a shipping container near a military base at night. Have the drones fly out in the middle of the day and attack some noncritical base or military infrastructure. Maybe have them blow up some planes that were set for decommissioning soon anyway. Maybe kill a few expendable soldiers in the process. Then fake and release some shipping manifest to tie the attack to Iran.
It's a fantastic false flag attack method. It would be nearly impossible to prove as a fake. And it's the kind of attack that military planners are already shouting the alarm over, as we've seen just this month how effective such an attack can be. Hell, the CIA could probably even be able to get a hold of some Iranian drones for the project. Russia has used a fair number of those in Ukraine, and I'm sure a good number have been downed or captured reasonably intact. The CIA likely already has actual Iranian drones. They could simply use some of those in a false flag attack.
Except it's the Trump administration we're talking about here. So they'd fuck it up in some way.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Kratos is a terrorist?
-
Kratos is a terrorist?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Well, yeah. He single-handedly destroyed cities just because he was pissed off at the gods.
-
Kratos is a terrorist?
Well… yeah.
-
The easiest attack to false-flag would be an automated drone attack against a stateside US military base. Remember that Ukraine Spiderweb drone attack from a few weeks back?
Ukraine built shipping containers with attack drones and retractable roofs. They contracted hapless Russian freight operators to deliver these shipping containers close to Russian air force bases. Then they remotely activated them, retracted the roofs, and had the drones take off to attack Russian airplanes just a few miles away.
This kind of attack would be trivially easy to false-flag. At least with a false flag in-person terrorist attack, there are people involved. You can dig into the backgrounds of the actual attackers and maybe uncover links to intelligence agencies.
But an automated drone attack? Just drop off a shipping container near a military base at night. Have the drones fly out in the middle of the day and attack some noncritical base or military infrastructure. Maybe have them blow up some planes that were set for decommissioning soon anyway. Maybe kill a few expendable soldiers in the process. Then fake and release some shipping manifest to tie the attack to Iran.
It's a fantastic false flag attack method. It would be nearly impossible to prove as a fake. And it's the kind of attack that military planners are already shouting the alarm over, as we've seen just this month how effective such an attack can be. Hell, the CIA could probably even be able to get a hold of some Iranian drones for the project. Russia has used a fair number of those in Ukraine, and I'm sure a good number have been downed or captured reasonably intact. The CIA likely already has actual Iranian drones. They could simply use some of those in a false flag attack.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]An attack on the military would make a lot of sense. Trump needs to manufacture consent within the military before he can reliably use them to eliminate protests. So this ticks all the boxes. Can't be small scale though. You need a significant death toll, you need spectacle, horror and shock. Needs to be a military installation in a highly visible location. You have to put on a show. Still wouldn't significantly reduce the US's military capacity, and you can bet it's a sacrifice Trump is willing to make. Especially after that disappointing birthday parade.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Yes. Not only that, but to pave the way for Trumps third, fourth, eight terms, and a sweeping presidential powers bill to coast through Congress that makes Patriot Act look like the Bill of Rights.
-
The white house? Woth no designated survivor?
Pleasepleasepleasepleaseplease
Iran, I will let you murder me for the gay if you stop them from doing it.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Broke: murder for the money
Woke: murder for the gay -
What do you need to live? Water.
What are the great lakes full of? Water.
Lake Superior thinks it's above the rest, a clear target for an attack on the nation's water supply... By blowing up Lake Superior!
So a sharknado attack?
-
Except it's the Trump administration we're talking about here. So they'd fuck it up in some way.
The drones would be gold painted & wearing maga hats?
-
I'm pretty sure Americans are gobbling up the media narrative of "Iran has nukes and the girls aren't educated"
Something like 70% of gradates in STEM fields in Iran are women. Their economy can't absorb the skilled labors because of the sanctions though, but that is their goal: To hinder democracy and a middle class that wouldn't want to sell out to the west. What the US and Israel is doing is meant to do the opposite of what leftists want for Iran. And war is certainly not going to make any of this better.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on last edited by [email protected]
I'm assuming that it'll target some property of Trump's that has recently had its insurance significantly bumped.
Trump gets his excuse and the insurance payout and his rabid supporters get further evidence of his exceptionalism.
-
I don't know why they're trying to push this narrative that Iran having nuclear weapons is somehow more bad for Western society than, for example, North Korea having nuclear weapons.
They're acting as if no hostile power has ever had nuclear weapons before.
I guess it is more "no power directly hostile to Israel in the Middle East"
