Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Microblog Memes
  3. male voters

male voters

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Microblog Memes
microblogmemes
156 Posts 48 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E [email protected]

    the original topic was mitch mconnell filibustering his own bill when obama approved it.

    This is a lie. It was not the "original topic" and anyone who can scroll up can confirm this. You're the one who keeps trying to talk about mcconnell (I have to actually write his name because otherwise you will immediately pretend I'm talking about someone else) in a thread that isn't about him.

    T This user is from outside of this forum
    T This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #147

    No its a original topic that you refuse to acknowledge. Which is you saying dems do nothing and me saying they (conservatives) only obstruct and enrich millionaires and racists, even against their own bills.

    Why did Mitch filibuster his own bill, crab? or do you want me to walk you through it like a child again?

    E 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A [email protected]

      Read my post and try again. We can continue when you demonstrate you're caught up.

      T This user is from outside of this forum
      T This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #148

      lets catch up with this first

      why are we de-funding public schools, alky?

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T [email protected]

        lets catch up with this first

        why are we de-funding public schools, alky?

        A This user is from outside of this forum
        A This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #149

        Defending public schools was going on long before Trump, the last public school in New Orleans closed in 2014. In areas with largely segregated populations, it takes a different appearance; they make a mostly black district, excluding any wealthy areas and businesses that would contribute taxes, and then you dont have to defund when theres no funds to start with, and those few funds go to a police department that hires from outside the district. See Furgison.

        The US never meaningfully desegregated.

        T 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A [email protected]

          Defending public schools was going on long before Trump, the last public school in New Orleans closed in 2014. In areas with largely segregated populations, it takes a different appearance; they make a mostly black district, excluding any wealthy areas and businesses that would contribute taxes, and then you dont have to defund when theres no funds to start with, and those few funds go to a police department that hires from outside the district. See Furgison.

          The US never meaningfully desegregated.

          T This user is from outside of this forum
          T This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #150

          So we are in agreement then? Trump defunding public schools (eradicating the department of education) is so they can finally 'lawfully' segregate us even more?

          was there a point to you arguing against me?

          A 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T [email protected]

            No its a original topic that you refuse to acknowledge. Which is you saying dems do nothing and me saying they (conservatives) only obstruct and enrich millionaires and racists, even against their own bills.

            Why did Mitch filibuster his own bill, crab? or do you want me to walk you through it like a child again?

            E This user is from outside of this forum
            E This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #151

            No its a original topic that you refuse to acknowledge.

            Yeah, it really sucks when people don't want to change the subject when you do.

            Which is you saying dems do nothing and me saying they (conservatives) only obstruct and enrich millionaires and racists, even against their own bills.

            Yeah, republicans do that. We don't have to keep making it easy for them. Yet we keep the filibuster around because republicans use it to block progressive legislation, and centrists like being able to point to republicans and be like "It's their fault!" When all it would take to pass anything democrats want is 50 votes to kill the filibuster for good. But they know they have people who will try endlessly to pivot to mcconnell in order to defend democrats' inaction.

            Why did Mitch filibuster his own bill, crab?

            I don't know. Why do you keep trying to change the subject to the guy who blocks the things you don't want passed for you?

            or do you want me to walk you through it like a child again?

            You do a lot of things like a child.

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E [email protected]

              No its a original topic that you refuse to acknowledge.

              Yeah, it really sucks when people don't want to change the subject when you do.

              Which is you saying dems do nothing and me saying they (conservatives) only obstruct and enrich millionaires and racists, even against their own bills.

              Yeah, republicans do that. We don't have to keep making it easy for them. Yet we keep the filibuster around because republicans use it to block progressive legislation, and centrists like being able to point to republicans and be like "It's their fault!" When all it would take to pass anything democrats want is 50 votes to kill the filibuster for good. But they know they have people who will try endlessly to pivot to mcconnell in order to defend democrats' inaction.

              Why did Mitch filibuster his own bill, crab?

              I don't know. Why do you keep trying to change the subject to the guy who blocks the things you don't want passed for you?

              or do you want me to walk you through it like a child again?

              You do a lot of things like a child.

              T This user is from outside of this forum
              T This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #152

              Yeah, it really sucks when people don’t want to change the subject when you do.

              or when the subject evolves into something you don't like, apparently.

              Why did Mitch fillibuster his own bill, crab? Its a simple answer, crab. Give me the formula to the krabby patty crabs!

              that last part was in jest, and I apologize, but you are a joke. so it fits.

              E 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T [email protected]

                Yeah, it really sucks when people don’t want to change the subject when you do.

                or when the subject evolves into something you don't like, apparently.

                Why did Mitch fillibuster his own bill, crab? Its a simple answer, crab. Give me the formula to the krabby patty crabs!

                that last part was in jest, and I apologize, but you are a joke. so it fits.

                E This user is from outside of this forum
                E This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #153

                Well, you've just admitted to trolling. Goodbye, pro-genocide troll.

                T 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E [email protected]

                  Well, you've just admitted to trolling. Goodbye, pro-genocide troll.

                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #154

                  goodbye, pretender. I wish you luck in your endeavors to worsen democracy because you don't like women and democrats.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T [email protected]

                    So we are in agreement then? Trump defunding public schools (eradicating the department of education) is so they can finally 'lawfully' segregate us even more?

                    was there a point to you arguing against me?

                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #155

                    The point is that Trump's education policy is not unique or new, and the republicans don't have a monopoly on racism; structural racism in education has a bipartisan consensus.

                    The fact that you attribute it to Trump tells me you either didn't know the history or you dont actually care beyond its utility as hostile evidence against the red team and will support the dems in 4 years when they promote policies with the same end effect in 2-4 years?

                    Just like with ICE, Bush created it, instead of defunding it, Obama built the cages, but libs only cared when Trump was using them, and there was total silence when Biden expanded them, and now libs pretend to care again.

                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A [email protected]

                      The point is that Trump's education policy is not unique or new, and the republicans don't have a monopoly on racism; structural racism in education has a bipartisan consensus.

                      The fact that you attribute it to Trump tells me you either didn't know the history or you dont actually care beyond its utility as hostile evidence against the red team and will support the dems in 4 years when they promote policies with the same end effect in 2-4 years?

                      Just like with ICE, Bush created it, instead of defunding it, Obama built the cages, but libs only cared when Trump was using them, and there was total silence when Biden expanded them, and now libs pretend to care again.

                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #156

                      The point is that Trump’s education policy is not unique

                      what do you think the department of education does, alky?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups