That instance runs Lemmy 1.0 which is still in alpha state, and the frontend is not compatible yet. So only the api works there.

ICYMI, yesterday @philipkristians was on stage talking with @leonido and on Monday there were two meetups all about the #Fediverse - we also brought #plushtodon to meet the fans #rp25 #rp25fedi

@Mastodon El día domingo 25/05/25 se realizaron las mega elecciones en la República Bolivariana de Venezuela, dicho proceso en el cual el voto del pueblo para elegir a 24 gobernadores y a parlamentarios nacionales y regionales, se ejecutó en absoluta Paz; las organizaciones políticas revolucionarias socialistas obtuvieron el triunfo de 23 gobernaciones y la mayoría absoluta de los Diputados/as tanto a nivel nacional como regional.Los factores derechistas y ultra derechistas fueron derrotados

@Mastodon hello, just did a reseach about social media that isn't about making people rich and maybe this result is useful to you too. If you can strengthen SEO, you might get far. "compared to an average post on facebook, what is the ranking...google among the relevant topics? ChatGPT said:Google ranking: because Mastodon instances aren’t optimized for SEO, even highly boosted toots usually fall on page 2–3 (positions 15–30) in Google results for related keyword searches seroundtable.com"

Hey [email protected] thanks for responding (and sorry for the late reply!) I am not married to the Announce([Article|Note|Page]) approach, so I am definitely open to Create([Article|Note|Page]) with a back-reference. I think I went the former direction because there is a known fallback mechanism — the Announce is treated as a share/boost/repost as normal. However, sending the Create also is fine I think. However, do we need a backreference? In my limited research, it seems that Piefed, et al. picks the first Group actor and associates the post with that community. If I sent over a Create(Article) with two Group actors addressed, could Piefed associate the post with the first, and initiate a cross-post with the remaining Group actors? Secondly, is how to handle sync. 1b12 relies on communities having reciprocal followers in order for two-way synchronization to be established. On my end since I know it is cross-posted I will now send 1b12 activities to cross-posted communities, but can Piefed, et al. send 1b12 activities back as well, in the absence of followers? cc [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

@sn0n @activitypub we're working on this!

@[email protected] It would be good for outgoing posts if cross posting is used for synced categories. But it doesn't solve the problem of incoming posts. For that, it would make sense to still slot incoming posts based on the sync setup. But there is still the problem of Lemmy not accepting follows from category actors.

@bogdanbiv @[email protected] this already exists using rel="me" markup for URLs, you can read about verification on Mastodon here https://joinmastodon.org/verification

@Mastodon Good luck, I hope all proposed changes and taken actions will turn out to be good for the platform and for the account holders of the #fediverse. In support of your decision to not accept VC funds, I just made a small donation. Thank you, and Godspeed!

@geonaima welcome, and thank you!