Remarkably interesting and human details—thank you for taking the time.

I get enjoyment in shit posts, this isn't a shit post. Lighten up.

Waxing quite poetic at times.

Obligatory: they did the maffematics!

Unless it was changed for some reason, replit allowed you to host websites and create code in your browser It can also you to host a game server if you try hard enough

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DIgyVeZtt7y/?igsh=dng1NjE1dDJjY3hk

i love this comment. underrated.

I mean.. possiblly? but still? weird.

There is only one error in your equations (and that doesn't change much about your point) is that the volume of that mixture is slightly lower than 108mL and should sit at about 107.1mL. Volume reduction in water - ethanol mixtures

squeaky toy sound on fist impact

Persons of land*

What if I told you Mozart used to riff all over that melody

Me to the mirror

I was reading these comments and i had flashbacks of my trips to tesco and saintsbury when i was in edinburgh few weeks ago. Thought it was a worldwide issue for a sec.. Then i saw what instance this post is from and i get it. I feel your god damn pain uk users. I will add to it that, no i do not like to look at my face, fuck off with that camera

That's part of the joke

We don't hate on cars. We hate on the fact that most cities are car-centric where you can't even walk; we dislike who buys a 5000L truck and uses it only to get kids from school and so on

China has as great a chance (and as little chance) as anyone else. Kingmakers and would be emperors have to make some serious decisions as their nation grows and develops: Do they go the autocratic dictator route and withhold civil liberties, or do they extend civil liberties outward, so that satellite colonies and conquered territories are more tolerant of imperial rule? History teems with examples of both, often from the same empire in different eras. It's not new, from the tolerance of other religions and customs by Xerxes I to the republic of SPQR. Heck, even France tried constitutional monarchy with the Bourbon restoration, so long as the Napoleonic code (defining civil rights and the rule of law) was preserved. Charlie X decided to stop that civil liberties nonsense and the people of France rolled out the guillotines once again. This is something I bring up as a difference between the Islamic State as a hypothetical to which Islamists aspire to, and the Islamic State as it is practiced in the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant; the latter clings harshly to Shariah law. Contrast the Iran during the Pahlavi era (the result of famine and revolution forming a new imperial republic) which established a code of civil rights (only US oil interests had to meddle) China is about to have an opportunity to become the world superpower, or an eastern adversary to Post-NATO Europe, and right now, democracy in the EU and UK are weakened by the same long-term reign of corporatist neoliberal parties (King Log) that are opposed by far-right nationalist movements which are gaining traction... or were until Trump reminded everyone of what fascist autocracy looks like. If China decides not to develop its humanity and civil liberties game, then those neoliberal parties will last a while longer while drifting to the right, until the nationalist take hold and they have a Big Fat War (not to be confused with WWIII or Nuclear War). But by then, the climate crisis will be extreme enough to make the future too chaotic to predict. This is why China is leading the sustainable energy race (and because Trump kisses the feet of Koch and big oil, the US is reversing course). This is all backed by the ethics theory of the social contract: So long as the public is comfortable they'll adhere to the laws of the land and play by the king's rules. Suffering breeds discontent and organized resistance.