I felt sorry for them
-
A billion? The FBI currently has over 37,100 employees, including approximately 13,700 special agents and 20,100 professionals, who serve as intelligence analysts, linguists, surveillance specialists, engineers, computer scientists, financial analysts, and other professionals.
We can infer that the OPs internet behaviour is and will be standard training material to weed out the weak-willed and easily tormented recruits for the next 100,000 years
-
This post did not contain any content.
Add him to the group chat.
-
Was ist denn das für ein süßer Fratz? Hat der wirklich so niedliche Fingerchen?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Scheint ein echtes Bild zu sein. Wenn man nach “praying otter” sucht kriegt man sehr viele solcher Bilder: “🦦”
-
Tell me you dont understand cybersec without telling me you dont understand cybersec
Encryption can be hack you nutter.
-
Still, most of bad stuff happening to people are not because something was hacked, but because someone leaked something. One person in a group chat would be enough.
Yes, that's the meatspace hacking I'm talking about
-
This post did not contain any content.
Those are some cute little hands
-
This post did not contain any content.
The real question is how you managed to get your friends/family to switch to Signal
-
Encryption can be hack you nutter.
Alright I'll bite. Tell me how exactly you "hack" encryption
-
This post did not contain any content.
Can't wait till they get the ability to decrypt all the shit we've been sending over signal. Shits gonna get real interesting.
They're just storing that shit up, waiting for the day...
It'll be a bloodbath.
-
I am 20, I was in self isolation due to possible depression and gender dysphoria since puberty, I was on the internet since then and I traumatized at least billion FBI agents.
A billion? So at least every 8th human is an FBI agent. I ain't one
-
Alright I'll bite. Tell me how exactly you "hack" encryption
There are several ways. There could be a vulnerability in one of the underlying algorithms, in the crypto system, or in the implementation.
I'm not saying signal isn't secure, but encryption can absolutely be hacked.
-
Alright I'll bite. Tell me how exactly you "hack" encryption
-
A billion? So at least every 8th human is an FBI agent. I ain't one
You are actually 3 of them
-
There are several ways. There could be a vulnerability in one of the underlying algorithms, in the crypto system, or in the implementation.
I'm not saying signal isn't secure, but encryption can absolutely be hacked.
The point of my comment was not to say it couldn't, it was to see if the OP of the comment knew anything about what they were talking about or if they were just spreading FUD. I know that it could happen, but saying that because it could happen means it did happen is a fools argument that I was curious to see what the response would be.
-
Add him to the group chat.
-
Tell me you dont understand cybersec without telling me you dont understand cybersec
I wouldn't be surprised if someday in the next thousand years someone figures out how to reverse the SHA256 hash function or something. (And I know there's an infinite number of possible theoretical inputs that can result in the same hash, but maybe they'd just pick the shortest or something)
RSA seemed pretty strong until shors algorithm and all the other quantum nonsense came around, and I don't think they've got enough quantum computers yet to render it powerless, but its also not unreasonable to think that eventually all modern encryption will be obsolete
-
only known method of hacking encryption
