Free Speech Goes Only One Way
-
Being fired from your job over things you said has nothing to do with the right to free speech. That right means the government won't punish you. It does not stop anyone else from punishing you.
Unless you think we were endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable Rights.
In which case the law is only there to enforce what we already own. And the concept of "Free Speech" goes past just laws.
Yes, some people misunderstand it. And others are too quick to "correct" them, even when their target is off.
Nobody is saying firing him was illegal.
-
Edit: Guess who won't face any accountability.
Yah but just release the list
-
Edit: Guess who won't face any accountability.
Paul Pelosi so deserved that shit though.
-
Yeah, because only one side cares about language and the words we use. The other side is a bunch of disengenous fuck bags with zero beliefs outside of economics
Conservative economics are not actually good economics. I hate that even liberals like to concede to the “economics” brand that conservatives talk about.
-
Paul Pelosi so deserved that shit though.
For what?
-
Thank you! Seems like very few people understand the concept of free speech.
It doesn't mean you can say whatever you want with no consequences, which is seeming what a lot of people believe
wrote last edited by [email protected]No, you are conflating the first amendment, a limited protection of free speech, with free speech itself.
It is very much a violation of free speech, its just not illegal. It still is immoral.
EDIT: fixed second amendment to first amendment
-
Edit: Guess who won't face any accountability.
Yes
But,
Fuck Reddit and Fuck Spez.
-
Conservative economics are not actually good economics. I hate that even liberals like to concede to the “economics” brand that conservatives talk about.
Selling off state assets and cutting taxes for the rich isn't really good economics. Its selling the future of your children to the future trillionaires.
-
Слава Україні, Cлава Палестині.
I sure wouldn't say no if they got rid of Stephen Crowder, since he's the one in this meme.
-
Yes
But,
Fuck Reddit and Fuck Spez.
wrote last edited by [email protected]Let it go dude. We are here now you don’t need to keep talking about your ex.
It’s virtue signalling at best as the overwhelming majority here agree with you. So what do you have to gain by saying this? You’re literally preaching to the converted.
Surely this isn’t your whole identity.
-
Edit: Guess who won't face any accountability.
That's basically the playbook.
The right cries free speech, but demands everyone else's free speech be removed.
-
Edit: Guess who won't face any accountability.
Freedom of speech is words that they will bend. Metallica taught me that in 1988.
-
Paul Pelosi so deserved that shit though.
I guess so did Charlie
-
It’s not like democratic presidents do shit about it
But, they shouldn't do shit about it? The president shouldn't be penalizing the media for saying things he didn't like.
I'm not complaining that the Democrat presidents let the media act like assholes, I complain that this administration tries to control the media and the media goes for it.
-
Thank you! Seems like very few people understand the concept of free speech.
It doesn't mean you can say whatever you want with no consequences, which is seeming what a lot of people believe
Problem is there's a big undertone of the administration penalizing news organizations that day things that are unwelcome. Interfering with their business dealings, limiting their access to information they need to provide coverage, bending things a bit to help out "news" outlets that are treating him well.
-
Let it go dude. We are here now you don’t need to keep talking about your ex.
It’s virtue signalling at best as the overwhelming majority here agree with you. So what do you have to gain by saying this? You’re literally preaching to the converted.
Surely this isn’t your whole identity.
You gate keeping me from comments against Reddit?
Get bent.
-
You gate keeping me from comments against Reddit?
Get bent.
wrote last edited by [email protected]Nah fam. Carry on if you like just know you’re preaching to the converted, but if that’s what strokes your ego crack on.
-
Edit: Guess who won't face any accountability.
Every Reich needs a Horst Wessel
-
No, you are conflating the first amendment, a limited protection of free speech, with free speech itself.
It is very much a violation of free speech, its just not illegal. It still is immoral.
EDIT: fixed second amendment to first amendment
I guess I misunderstood something here.
I just don't think you should be able to say whatever you want without any consequences. Eg. Call someone a slur, get punched in the face. I don't think that's a violation of free speech
-
Edit: Guess who won't face any accountability.
There is some notable discrepancy between how USA citizens describe their (theoretical & practical) "free speech" vs how the rest of the world sees their "free speech" in the same regard.
It's def a complex subject but I don't think a lot of people think USA is at the forefront of this.
(But it is extensively marketed - most countries/cultures/regimes have such tidbits, which differ a lot.)
