will document for sex
-
Sex is with consent. If there's no consent it's a rape
i agree!
-
kinda uncomfortable this ignores concept of consent?
That falls under WRONG. Lack of consent is WRONG but there’s also nothing worse than documentation that is WRONG.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Absolutely not. I'd rather have no documentation and start from scratch than be gaslit by an entire team of people telling me that the very obviously wrong documentation is correct and has been correct for 30 years
-
Someone's never read instructions autotranslated from Chinese and not checked for accuracy.
Literally me yesterday trying to decipher Baidu’s PaddleOCR docs. Have half a mind to aim Claude Code at the URL and just be like ‘plz help’
-
This post did not contain any content.
Bad sex is not better than no sex.... Wtf...
-
This post did not contain any content.
Don't be virgins, document things
-
This post did not contain any content.
There's this cool program called qalc. I stumble on to cool features in it that's not even listed in the documentation.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Completely incorrect - bad documentation can be actively harmful, wasting your time with its inaccuracies.
-
This post did not contain any content.
What about rape? Is that just chatgpt reworded documentation?
-
This post did not contain any content.
As an asexual person this anology is very confusing
-
As an asexual person this anology is very confusing
As a sexual person, I agree
-
As an asexual person this anology is very confusing
Maybe it can be translated into something else, like, "Documentation is like toilet paper, when it's good it's good, when it's bad it's better than nothing"? Or, "Documentation is like clothes, even if they are bad it's better than nothing", or "Documentation is like having something you need, it's better to have the thing you need even if is not good, than to not have the thing you need at all"?
-
This post did not contain any content.
"Documentation is like sex: You're not getting any"
-
This post did not contain any content.
Then you haven’t seen bad documentation (or had that sex you regret).
-
Absolutely not. I'd rather have no documentation and start from scratch than be gaslit by an entire team of people telling me that the very obviously wrong documentation is correct and has been correct for 30 years
I think there's a difference between bad and wrong. Wrong documentation is incorrect. Bad documentation isn't really incorrect, it's just poorly executedb and mostly unhelpful.
-
I think there's a difference between bad and wrong. Wrong documentation is incorrect. Bad documentation isn't really incorrect, it's just poorly executedb and mostly unhelpful.
I mean, incorrect documentation is clearly bad, so...
-
I mean, incorrect documentation is clearly bad, so...
Seemed more like the problem was the gaslighting than the documentation.
-
Absolutely not. I'd rather have no documentation and start from scratch than be gaslit by an entire team of people telling me that the very obviously wrong documentation is correct and has been correct for 30 years
That documentation sounds like marriage.
-
kinda uncomfortable this ignores concept of consent?
Nothing worse than non-consensual documentation.
-
What about rape? Is that just chatgpt reworded documentation?
When something like python tries to force readability into your code without your consent?
That's why I always use a nonsensical class structure with stupid names; it's my chastity belt.
