There's hope for privacy yet
-
If they can make money off you, they will.
-
Yes, or "commercial TV", which should include a TV tuner built-in. For the US, here are some examples of 4K commercial TVs for under $1,000:
-
I got a Sharp Android smart tv last year when my 2006 Samsung died and it works great without internet access. Cheapest one there was.
-
-
Hit up thrift stores they always have a pile in decent shape. Just test them at an outlet
-
Many smart TVs still give you popups telling you to connect to the internet or they simply refuse work without connection. There's not a very good way to tell if any smart TV you get will do this ahead of time without looking over reviews, and even then many people just connect their TVs anyway so it might not show up there either.
I'd prefer to just have a display that works as a display from the start and not have to worry about it.
-
-
Must be a good store if you stay there half the year
-
"subsidized" – TVs sold perfectly well before they were flooded with ads. Ads and selling user data just mean more money for CEOs. Always more, MORE, MOOORE PROFIT!
-
There are tutorials on how to block secondary DNS servers when using Pihole. (The one I followed is in German but you can probably use your translator of choice.)
-
Yeah. It's locked down at the firewall level.
-
Well that just made my day a little worse
-
I asked the man how come and he said “Well, dumb TVs are hard to get and they sell almost immediately. So they’re worth more than the smart ones.”
He's wrong. They're cheaper because the manufacturer makes money off selling advertisements.
-
I suspect the vast majority of people are buying dumb TVs because android TV sucks, not for privacy reasons. I'm willing to bet most go home and plug their Chromecast or FireTV stick right in.
So as long as android TV sucks, its good news for us.
-
That's a nice thought. Thank you for sharing
-
I've always wanted to ask a billionaire how much was enough, but I'm pretty sure he wouldn't understand the question. Enough? What's that?