Europe will not be part of Ukraine-Russia peace talks, US envoy says
-
Can the US and Russia leave Europe the fuck alone for five minutes?
-
Sorry, but the ideological-split in the US is such that no-more-than 2/3 of the US could be siding with Nazis.
No matter how convenient, it isn't wise karma to be oversimplifying & labeling everybody-in-a-country as being on 1 ideological side.
Same with Israel, where the good people are finding they cannot speak truth openly, & live in fear..
Same with the US..
Same with all countries which go that route.
In WW2 there were Germans, in Germany, who worked to dismantle/end Nazi rule, for Germany, & they were loyal to their values. 1 book on that is named, iirc, "An Honorable Defeat".
Ignoring actual-diversity, for ideological oversimplification, makes one into part-of-the-same-problem, objectively..
non-thinking, only reacting, just like Nazis..
Whatever: I don't expect more than 100 million or 150 million to survive US Civil War Part2's completion, maybe that's waaay too optimistic, but given that about 2/3 of the US's voters are good with male-supremacism & white-supremacism, it's going to be the most huge & vicious civil war this planet's seen in awhile, with more guns in it than any previous one ( nearly-all owned by the Trump-side of it, too )..
maybe I shouldn't expect more than 50 million to survive it..
going to be a very-bad next-decade, on this continent..
.. sigh ..
_ /\ _
-
Sorry, but the ideological-split in the US
-
I did not think I linked a live article. The content of the article changed quite a lot. Very strange.
Unrelated side note: what is "The Observer"? I have not noticed it before. some new think tank?
-
The Observer is one of the oldest news papers in the world. Generally quality journalism I think, though I'm not a regular reader. Since a few decades under the same ownership as the guardian, but apparently sold 2 months ago.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Observer
And articles changing after first publishing happens quite a lot. It beats putting out a separate article for every small development in an ongoing story. For example: entity A said x about B, and later there's an update wherein B denies x happened. In quality journalism it used to be done in clear updates at the bottom and/or top of the article. But now with Trump, A is claiming x and then later A realizes how dumb that was, so A claims they never said x and that they've always been saying y. Good luck reporting on that in a clear and concise manner.
-
Trump and Putin their relationship isn't going to reverse. Trump is a gullible idiot and Putin is not, if they meet and negotiate face to face, then Putin is going to get what he wants. Especially because Trump has said before negotiations even started, that he wanted to give the occupied lands to Russia. Trump is such a "master negotiator" that he sells out his own side before the talks even start. This is why Putin wants to negotiate alone with the usa, without the eu countries or NATO present.
-
In land area sure. In people, most live toward the western part.
-
USA will be doing project ukraine-the-proxy-Russia peace talks.
-
The Observer is The Guardian's Sunday paper
-
They also won't result in anything other than US disengagement. Ukraine won't surrender just because Trump says so. And neither will Poland and the Baltic states, and because of that the EU as a whole won't.
It won't even end the war. It'll just make America look weak.
-
Yeah I'm not blaming you. Just following the topic elsewhere and noticed links posted to lemmy being behind
