Deepseek Hacked

[autonomoususer@lemmy.world]

These are public posts. What are you on about?

[whyjiffie@sh.itjust.works]

only if it would be so easy. think about your data that's taken about you and you can't refuse. healthcare, home ownership, if you're still learning then a bunch of data about your progress, and maybe even your handwriting

[autonomoususer@lemmy.world]

Where's your solution?

[tsesejuer@lemmy.world]

only solution to not having data harvested is to not have even been born. YW

[monotremata@lemmy.ca]

I think it's reasonably likely. There was a research paper about how to do basically that a couple years ago. If you need a basic LLM trained on a specialized form of input and output, getting the expensive existing LLMs to generate that text for you is pretty efficient/inexpensive, so it's a reasonable way to get a baseline model. Then you can add stuff like chain of reasoning and mixture of experts to improve the performance back up to where you need it. It's not going to be a way to push the state of the art forward, but it's sure a cheap way to catch up to models that have done that pushing.

[boomkop3@reddthat.com]

That was quick

[whyjiffie@sh.itjust.works]

Unfortunately I don't have one, other than a long term plan of eating the rich. But the issue is there and we shouldn't ignore it.

[gissamittjobb@lemmy.ml]

Exposing your database directly to the internet? God damn, it really is amateur hour.

[cyber@feddit.uk]

I smell politics here over ethical hacking

Normally, when vulnerabilities are found, the responsible steps are to disclose to the site owner first before waiting for them to resolve it (ie 90 days).

I didn't see that mentioned in Wiz's article - which is showing their data & links to the vulnerabilities.

[cyber@feddit.uk]

True, but they're all as bad as each other. OpenAI was breached last year too...