NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Spotted with Missing ROPs, Performance Loss Confirmed, Multiple Vendors Affected
-
Yes, I think this is the case too, especially with this gen.
-
Man, I am as frustrated with Nvidia as anybody, but that type of vaguely-informed ranting really makes me go on the defensive.
For one thing, the dumb gatekeeping at the end is absurd. I've been building PCs since the early 90s, there are more informed users now than there have ever been, by far. And those that aren't regurgitate whatever they hear on Youtube from tech influencers anyway. Fortnite casuals aren't what's keeping you from owning a 5090, friend.
Speaking of uninformed users regurgitating half-understood Youtube talking points, Nvidia certainly wasn't going to ship 5090s with a single damaged ROP unit as 5080s, those two cards are built on entirely different dies. It's very likely that they'll have some 5080SuperTi thing coming out eventually perhaps built on cut down GB202 instead of the GB203 in the base model, but it'd certainly not be cutting down an ROP and leaving everything else the same. That's not even the 5090D spec. Plus Nvidia confirms other cards in the 50 series are also affected.
More importantly, neither of us knows how these made it to market. There's certainly at the very least some lax QA, and I'm sure there was pressure to get as many of the very limited 5090s to retail as possible, but crappy as the 50 series is in many areas I genuinely doubt Nvidia would be so dumb as to deliberately putting chips with this very specific, very consistent fault in the pipes hoping nobody would notice a performance drop and peek at GPU-Z even once. That's not how this works. I'd love to know what actually happened to cause this, though.
So yes, the 40 and 50 series are named one step too high on the stack. Yes, the pricing increases have been wild, and it's frustrating that demand is high enough to support it and regulators aren't stepping in to moderate the MSRP mishandling. Yes, Nvidia mismanaged the 50 series launch in multiple ways, from bad connector design to rushing the 5090 to misleading marketing on frame generation and probably underbaked drivers. That doesn't mean every issue is the same issue, and it certainly doesn't mean that a lack of "knowledgeable users" is to blame.
-
Zotac and PNY don't make the chips, NVIDIA at fault here. Some people care because they don't actually have a ton of money, but gaming is their hobby and they've saved up 2-3 years so they can afford a high end card because it's worth it to them the extra $50 or $100 represents the difference between being able to afford the card and not, or maybe having a couple of extra games to play on it.
-
Can you remember a fuckup-free Nvidia launch?
Un-releases, melting connecters (part 1), cropped vram.
Geforces 1-3 We're ok on launch from what I remember..
-
10 series there was backlash over them advertising an MSRP and getting reviewers to assess the cards at that value, but having "founders pricing", where the initial run of cards (that IIRC were Nvidia reference cards only) were far more than the MSRP.
20 series they ramped up prices despite small performance gains, saying that it's due to ray tracing, and that when new ray tracing games came out the difference would be incredible. Ray traced games didn't actually come out until long after, and the RT performance was straight up unplayable on any card. But enough time had went past that people couldn't return the cards by the time that was known.
30 series there was the supply issues, 3090s and 3080s melting in a few games (most prominently in New Dawn), outrageously fake MSRPs (Nvidia was actually selling the GPUs to partners for more than the MSRP!), and really bad levels of VRAM that caused issues (8GB on the 3070/3070 Ti)
-
Your last paragraph literally counters everything you said but the last sentence.
So yes, the 40 and 50 series are named one step too high on the stack. Yes, the pricing increases have been wild, and it's frustrating that demand is high enough to support it and regulators aren't stepping in to moderate the MSRP mishandling. Yes, Nvidia mismanaged the 50 series launch in multiple ways, from bad connector design to rushing the 5090 to misleading marketing on frame generation and probably underbaked drivers.
That's it
-
Dawg why are you so slurpy over what is clearly money grubbing.
-
But Nvidia have clearly sold them the chips and told than that some of those cores aren't working. And they said OK and hoped nobody would really notice.
-
T [email protected] shared this topic
-
What NVIDIA have told AIBs is completely unknown, but NVIDIA certainly hold all the power, if NVIDIA say ship them, they ship them.
Note there have been reports of FE cards, MSI, Zotac, Gigabyte and Manli all impacted.
-
And really, can one ever have too many rodents opining posthumously?
