DeepSeek just proved Lina Khan right

[email protected]

Even someone as far back as Adam Smith knew that businesses hate competition and will do anything they can to avoid it. The broligarchy was speed-running the construction of an oligopoly and lobbying the government to erect barriers to entry so they could take their sweet time milking us dry. Now I'm not sure about what the real backstory of DeepSeek might be, but it is still satisfying to see Altman get his ass handed to him.

[email protected]

Wow, we could have been talking about Jacquard mills and running essentially the same narrative.

[email protected]

Yeah, they seem to have sped up the process. But something else to keep in mind is that we don't know what the saturation point is with current AI technology. It's most likely far less that what has been hyped, and if our governments had any sense, they should be getting a sensible regulatory framework in place right now rather than being overtaken by events as they usually are.

[email protected]

I'll be honest, I'm just hoping this AI shit calms down. Every 5-6 new papers published in the Journal of Computer Science is some AI slop. Like we get it, it's fun filling a big ass matrix with weights which then inadvertently solve a problem you have. Could I please have some novel research that probably won't go anywhere anytime soon but is kind of fun to think about and tinker with?

[email protected]

it's a shame the US will likely not see another lina khan in the foreseeable future.

[email protected]

It sometimes happens like that. And sometimes a big player will emerge early in the proceedings and stay on top for an extended period: General Motors, Boeing, IBM, Oracle, Microsoft, Google. Sometimes there's even a bit of innovation before they settle into stealing all the light from the smaller trees.

[email protected]

Two sides of the same coin. Colonialism is an implementation of the capitalist notion of comparative advantage, stabilized and enforced with guns.

[email protected]

In other news, today's leopards are better at eating your face than you thought.

[email protected]

but it was capitalists who made smartphones and computers

Lately, capitalists of a very mercanitlist kind.

[email protected]

'Investment' is a nice way to put it. A more apt description would be that the developing world invested in the West's industrialization (or the West stole it, whatever floats your boat) and the Western world chose to give essentially nothing back to its investors, directly contradicting the new capitalist world it had created.

Which is why many in the developing world feel that China's rise to prominence is the West's chickens coming home to roost.

A Kenyan official once said: 'When China visits we get a hospital. When Britain visits we get a lecture'

[email protected]

[email protected]

Again, I won't argue that colonial wealth didn't contribute to the rise of Western Europe, but it was Europeans who invented the steam engine, developed thermodynamics as a science and put half a continent's worth of resources and intellect into the industrial revolution. Colonialism is only a contributing factor that came after the start of the industrial revolution. Hell, France for example barely had any colonies during the early industrial revolution and that didn't at all impede its industrialization or rise to power. If you look at, say, Ottoman history you'll see that the thing European countries had and the Ottomans didn't wasn't wealth but rather ideas.

Which is why many in the developing world feel that China's rise to prominence is the West's chickens coming home to roost.

As someone from the developing world (specifically the Middle East), we are salty about colonialism, but many of us also recognize that if we don't learn from the history of colonialism and what allowed Europe to conquer half the world (including us) we'll always be on the bottom rung of the world. There's a lot more to learn from the rise of Europe than "fuck colonialism".

[email protected]

You can always get into 3d printing.

[email protected]

We didn't deserve her, but I am honored and grateful to have had her working for my interests. What she was or wasn't able to accomplish wasn't for lack of trying.

[email protected]

Colonialism is essentially theft with a pretty red ribbon on top to make it look good so we can all unequivocally say fuck colonialism.

But my point is beyond that. It's that the progress that's been achieved through those ideas you're celebrating was predicated on that very theft and the suffering of people on developing countries. In a sense those in developing countries have an ownership stake in Western industrialization and China is the first previously developing nation that's coming to take back what is in part theirs. They won't be the last to do so.

[email protected]

AI is the new blockchain

[email protected]

Fancy way of saying "gambling"

[email protected]

And Electrum still crashes under FreeBSD when trying to send BTC, and I don't see many more FOSS thin wallets for BTC, despite it being the cryptocurrency. And using 15GB for a wallet is out of question.

If it works the same way with "AI", we might eventually see this wave of bullshit recede.

[email protected]

I like this observation, because the kind of information imbalance normal for today wasn't for late XIX and early XX centuries, where our common ideas of economics originate, Marxist and Austrian and what not.

It's not that the weak could say more about the strong in the press, it's the speed with which information traveled, and also that the strong had more trouble coordinating their actions.

Why did I type this bullshit anyway, as if it changes something.

[email protected]

Big mood.

Do people still say big mood?

agnos.is Forums

DeepSeek just proved Lina Khan right