Try asking something about Xi Jinping.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
When there is free software, the user is the product. It's just a psyops tool disguised as a FOSS.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Not everyone can afford hardware that can support a 67B LLM. You're talking top tier hardware.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
True, but one is a situation, and the other is a person. I didn't know that the existence of Xi Jinping was a controversial idea in China...
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The official hosting of it has censorship applied after the answer is generated, but from what I heard the locally run version has no censorship even though they could have theoretically trained it to.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
How are you the product if you can download, mod, and control every part of it?
Ever heard of WinRAR?
Audacity?
VLC media player?
Libre office?
Gimp?
Fruitloops?
Deluge?Literally any free open source standalone software ever made?
Just admit that you aren't capable of approaching this subject unbiasly.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You just named Western FOSS companies and completely ignored the "psyops" part. This is a Chinese psyops tool disguised as a FOSS.
99.9999999999999999999% can't afford or have the ability to download and mod their own 67B model. The vast majority of the people who will use it will be using Deepseek vanilla servers. They can collect a mass amount of data and also control the narrative on what is truth or not. Think TikTok but on a work computer.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Whine more about free shit
I'm blocking you now
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Bye Tankie.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
AI chatbots do not lay out facts
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Well, that's the intent at least. Not to form an opinion.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If you're of the idea that it's not a genocide you're wrong. There is no alternate explanation. If it were giving a fact that would be correct. The fact that it's giving both sides is an opinion rather than a fact.
If their ibtebtion was fact only. The answer would have been yes
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You're arguing with an AI. It's a computer. It doesn't have an opinion. It gives perspective on both sides and you determine an answer. Just because you have more conviction it doesn't make the AI formulate an opinion.