Trump doesn’t seem to know why he launched a giant trade war
-
Look at the Project 2025 document, its supposedly written by the heritage foundation but has a section on building a border wall and doing capital punishment. Its clearly crafted by Trump.
Inside it talks about tariffs, using them to force other countries to lower their tariffs against the US. I assume its meant to force a free trade agreement that is 100% free trade, and not a misnomer like it is now.
-
all due respect, but you are not a news entity and you will never know whether your license was honored, so i really don't see the point. but like i said, you do you
-
Yeah that’s the conclusion isn’t it
-
It's deeper than that. Putin conditioned the dementia into him, so once the orders are carried out, he forgets
-
-
You think trump is capable of not just coming up with the worst political takes known to man, but also is even aware of that much policy?
I think you give him way more credit than he deserves
-
Seems like it's not going according to plan then huh. US opponents are anything but submissive right now. I don't think US has the capacity for a long game.
-
Trump's 'beautiful' tariffs are just ugly taxes on consumers and businesses alike.
-
That's a weird way to write inheritance.
-
Like a Manchurian Canadiate?
-
Sure, but instead of individual targets it's the USA
-
Musk didn't inherit billions.
-
But backwards. A Candidate Manchurian
-
The big corps can weather the storm, smalls will have to sell, consolidate and monopolize is the plan as I see it
-
That's chicken change if you make, say, $80K+. Significant if you make, say, $20K. (Thinking about individuals, not households, adjust accordingly. And COL is a huge thing depending.)
In any case, I'd take that number with a bucket of salt. Can't see any way that number was calculated meaningfully this early in the game.
-
all due respect, but you are not a news entity and you will never know whether your license was honored, so i really don’t see the point. but like i said, you do you
The point is to have protection for my content. I have the same rights under the law as ANYBODY ELSE. All are capable of licensing their content on social sites that protects themselves with Safe Harbor laws.
As far as enforcement goes, that is not my job. If a law is not enforced doesn't mean I don't try to avail myself of the protections under the law. I don't constantly audit my local police force to be sure that they are enforcing laws.
I want my content to be available and used by open-source organizations, and I signal that via my license. Otherwise the default licensing (show nothing) does not allow them to do so.
Finally, is it really worth your time (and all other citizens) to nag/harass someone away from using the same laws that Corporations use to their benefit? I mean I point to an "Ask Lemmy" post often (here, let me do it again) where this has been hashed out already. You're not saying anything new. But it seems like every individual still wants to recreate the conversation again, and again, and again, for SOME strange reason.
~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~
-
GDP is always calculated in nominal and real (inflation adjusted) GDP.
Inflation does not reduce debt to GDP by increasing the perceived GDP, but by devalueing the debt owned, as it is a fixed sum with usually interest rates fixed for a certain time
