Mullvad's privacy-focused search engine Leta is now free for all users | Leta acts as a proxy for Google and Brave search results

[scytale@lemm.ee]

They were bought by a shady company a while back.

[sturgist@lemmy.ca]

@Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
@sibachian@lemmy.ml
@AnotherPenguin@programming.dev
@catloaf@lemm.ee
@fatboy93@lemm.ee

So....I guess it kinda seems like a .gif vs .gif sorta situation, we'll never come to a consensus, there will forever be disparate camps chuckling under their breath at all the "idiots" that can't even pronounce SearXNG right...the fools.....

Well, guess I'll sleep on it and join a camp some day.... le sigh

[fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com]

Searching. XNG makes the "Ching" sound in some languages.

[theloweststone@lemmy.world]

If there's no method of exploitation then you haven't found a vulnerability. You're just describing how the system works.

[01189998819991197253@infosec.pub]

Oh snap. I had no idea!

[Guest]

Are you referring to Privacy One Group? Seems like that was cleared up and PrivacyTools went back to recommending them

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Startpage.com

[scytale@lemm.ee]

System1 specifically, which is also mentioned in the article you linked.

[psythik@lemm.ee]

Funny you say that, because my only complaint about this search engine is that it's missing the AI "garbage". I suppose I could just go directly to Gemini but it was convenient getting a quick answer without having to use two separate websites.

[lastyearsirritant@sopuli.xyz]

Gemini is wrong quite often. You shouldn't rely on it to tell you facts.

If I need to double check it, then it's worthless to me.

[psythik@lemm.ee]

Thankfully I don't rely on it for "facts", just for a quick summary on something or to get a definition of a word. Something like that.

[Guest]

Thanks for the response!

[helpmyusernamewontfi@lemmy.today]

Your IP address and search terms are automatically shared with our search partners, Microsoft Bing or Google, when you search.

https://www.ecosia.org/privacy

[myersguy@lemmy.simpl.website]

Sorry, I left this ambiguous. My intended context was that the person you were replying to didn't mention Ecosia's privacy.