OpenAI whistleblower’s deemed suicide
-
We are definitely receiving limp penis.
-
I don't think that's it at all. Wealth and power makes people stupid, and in order to keep believing in their own superior status, they have to believe we are stupider than them, which is very stupid indeed.
Like it or not, even "monsters" have to have a model of the world and a theory of mind in order to operate. If they didn't think about us, they wouldn't be able to exploit us. If they didn't treat us with contempt, they wouldn't be able to exploit us. So, contemptuous consideration it is.
It's just that is a poor model of reality, so it's going to be part of their downfall. They are going to keep treating us as idiots until we surprise them by suddenly not acting the part anymore. These abuses are clear and they are piling up. We remember the panama papers and what happened to those journalists. We remember what happened to Snowden, Manning and Assange. This has an undermining effect on the legitimacy of the system.
You don't see the termites until the house is already falling down around you.
-
Kinda like when all those whistle-blowers in Russia accidently fall out the window.
-
I really appreciate you illustrating my point here, bravo.
-
Isn't it fucked that we're surrounded by so many rich villains that it could go either way?
-
Did he fall out a window?
-
According to the police records, the man committed suicide by shooting himself twice in the back of his head.
-
People love mocking Russians when their “leaders” fall out of windows, but where are these people when corpos kill plebs within US?
You assumed it was about being fair. People just like to shit on russia to distract from internal problems, it was never about the "people falling out of the window" thing.
-
What kind of info do you think they could have had? With boeing, it's probably something about corruption, pocketing state subsidy money that should have gone to actual projects, or something similar.
-
The laws have always been in place for us, not them.
-
OpenAI is a slimy company with slimy leadership that hoovers up people's work without permission and without punlishment, and turns scientific discoveries into a walled garden of overhyped spam generators.
Do they really need a whistleblower to tell us this?
