DeepSeek AI raises national security concerns, U.S. officials say

[lurch@sh.itjust.works]

it's the so called weights. the learned data after training.

they didn't provide neither training data, nor lists of sources, so nobody can recreate it, but them.

[sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world]

It's open source. Trying to block it is futile now lmao

[themurphy@lemmy.ml]

Just like EV's and battery technology. Up to 40% tarrif on some brands.

They are cheaper with more range. The range is literally only achievable through better technology and hardware.

[whostosay@lemmy.world]

An absolute fuck ton

[eezyville@sh.itjust.works]

This is just so fun to watch.

America: "Executive order now! No US person is allowed to help the Chinese develop these technologies! We will imprison you traitor!"

China: "OK. We'll just develop it ourselves."
DeepSeek enters the chat

America: "Fuck! National security emergency!"

[naeap@sopuli.xyz]

Distilling OpenAI and Llama models probably also helped quite a bit

Although I must admit, the the architectural changes are pretty cool

but I have to add, that I've just started reading into the topic a few weeks ago and don't really have any real practical experience, besides checking out some huggingface docs I got linked yesterday and stupid me hasn't thought about looking there...
So everything I say is probably bullshit o⁠:⁠-⁠)

[catloaf@lemm.ee]

Ever heard of Huntsville?

[qyron@sopuli.xyz]

Good. Perhaps while all the idiots are busy devising a "plan" to address this, those evil brain leave everyone else alone.

[catloaf@lemm.ee]

A lot of stuff. You analyze that data, you can refine your psyops.

[0liviuhhhhh@lemmy.blahaj.zone]

Sure it made the training process faster, but this still takes a fraction of the energy to generate a single output compared to other LLMs like ChatGPT or Llama. Plus it's open source. You can't discredit a technological advancement for building upon previous advancement, especially when doing so with transparency.

[0liviuhhhhh@lemmy.blahaj.zone]

And why should I be more worried about a hypothetical psyop that i might experience than the current psyops that I am experiencing?

[catloaf@lemm.ee]

You are experiencing psyops from every direction. Some are just more obvious than others.

[homesweethomemrl@lemmy.world]

Uh . . no . . no we hav- I mean, I haven't. Could you maybe upload some video of this "Huntsville"? Preferably in angles that are not otherwise obtainable via a sweep of existing Internet resources?

We uh have a friend who is very interested in Huntsville, maybe you could focus on some of the city's important areas and uh, industries.

[magnus919@lemmy.brandyapple.com]

Let's also remember that "U.S. officials" now describes MAGA flunkies that replaced actually qualified professionals.

[satansmaggotycumfart@lemmy.world]

Or using slave labour so if the US is smart it should use prisoners to build cheap EVs.

[naeap@sopuli.xyz]

As I said, the architectural changes are quite cool

As far as I've understood it mostly comes down to splitting it up into multiple expert systems, so you don't need to activate the complete system with every request

But I've only scratched the surface...

Also, open source... The weights are made publicly available.
None of the training data or systems

[softestsapphic@lemmy.world]

NOOOOOOOOO

MYY YACHT MONEYYYYYYYY

[mannycalavera@feddit.uk]

The veil.... it has been lifted.

[themurphy@lemmy.ml]

It's true that working conditions is not the same at all in China, which also makes this possible.

Put the technology is still better, even if they acquired it cheaper than possible in the US.

[srh@lemmy.world]

China built it in cave, with a box of scraps!