Wealth inequality risks triggering 'societal collapse' within next decade, report finds
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I can think of a couple of ways to fix that.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
This is why the fascist billionaires are carrying out their great takeover.
They know the jig is up and everything's going to crumble down and no one will escape it.They just want to rob whatever they still can before they too croak. Thre is no great plan for their survival beyond a few years in an underground bunker, either...
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It’s a hilariously incompetent strategy by the rich because they’re more dependent on a functioning society than any other group. You can tell they’re not smart nor good leaders when they build luxury bunkers in New Zealand because those won’t save them from losing virtually (and possibly literally) everything they have. They have everything to lose and the only thing they need to do to keep their wealth and power is to contribute to the society they’re living off of. They’re failing miserably because they lack compassion. It will be their downfall.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It is why they are hastily trying to turn the calendar back to 1933 but they might overshoot and get 1789.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Just hope nobody does a Napoleon...
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Barron is way too tall.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
"within the next decade" sounds like an unnecessarily long view on it. Next Christmas will come within the next decade too but it doesn't mean it'll be 10 years from now.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
pretty sure they said the same ting 10 years ago
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Have an additional one
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Napoleon was actually about average height for the time. The shortness thing was just British (?) war propaganda to, for lack of a less on the nose term, belittle him in the public consciousness.
Barron IS still freakishly tall, though. He should either stop doing that or become really good at basketball or volleyball.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
And the trend has only accelerated since. Especially now that the fascists are implementing Project 2025 with frantic haste.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
so you're 100% on societal collapse by 2035?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
but isn't their strategy literally how they have 90 percent of the wealth? seems a crushingly effective strategy. what do you suppose their downfall looks like? does it happen before or after ours?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Nope. As I clarified in my edit, the exact timeline from the headline is usually wrong and never the point.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Not to go off on a quite wild tangent from societal collapse but I think beyond propaganda Napoleon was often flanked by tall and hand-picked elite guards and ironically also old aristocracy generals themselves tall from richer diet and so appeared short in comparison.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Agreed. We just know it's coming so it's time to prepare for battle.