Train your brain
-
Oh, so I should get a positronic brain?
wrote last edited by [email protected]Step 1: positronic brain
Step 2: make a fuck-ton of clocks
Step 3: profit
-
This post did not contain any content.
education is a fair use exception, too
-
Hmm...
If I illegally download college course text books I could also technically pirate a whole ass education. Just won't have a degree.
Unless... Can I pirate that, too?
All you need to do is print it, forge the signatures and input it in the national registry. Should be doable.
-
This post did not contain any content.
So I can cover a song and distribute it, right? Right??
-
Oh, so I should get a positronic brain?
My dyslexia turned that into post ironic brain and that works too
-
So I can cover a song and distribute it, right? Right??
No, but you can learn it
-
This post did not contain any content.
True but it is only legal if you are a multi billion dollar company that could have paid for it, but didn't choose so.
If you can't afford it you should rot in Guantanamo for ever!
-
No, but you can learn it
So then I guess I can learn the song, write down the notes from memory, and play that cover. It's all gone through a neural network and so it's all fine, right?
-
My dyslexia turned that into post ironic brain and that works too
I like post-ironic. That's when satire doesn't work any more because real life is worse.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Well, someone had to say it, so here I go:
inhales
If piracy isnt owning, then buying isn't stealing?
wait i messed it up
-
True but it is only legal if you are a multi billion dollar company that could have paid for it, but didn't choose so.
If you can't afford it you should rot in Guantanamo for ever!
It's also ok if you are using it in an effort to make workers obsolete and upend the entire economy.
-
It's also ok if you are using it in an effort to make workers obsolete and upend the entire economy.
Yeah. Thats good. All law violations excused to do that. Also you get all the water if you're trying.
-
Well, someone had to say it, so here I go:
inhales
If piracy isnt owning, then buying isn't stealing?
wait i messed it up
A+ for effort lol
-
This post did not contain any content.
When laws do not work for most of the people is it worth following in the first place?
-
This post did not contain any content.
I don't know if it's different in the US, but here the downloading isn't punished, it's the sharing that gets you in trouble.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
Courts will say "no, that's not what we meant by that" and will slap you silly.
AI companies aren't on the side of copyright reform or abolition, they just want an exception for themselves so they can keep doing whatever they're doing now. (And they also want more IP laws to cover the current grey areas, so they can stop pretending to give a damn about open models)
-
I don't know if it's different in the US, but here the downloading isn't punished, it's the sharing that gets you in trouble.
Our government allows ludicrous control to rights holders. I don't own any copies of movies, for example, even discs. Disney owns the physical discs. I just have them in my home. I own the right to play the discs in certain ways. I'll bet policies will be updated to clarify that Disney doesn't approve of, "training AI".
But it's the same here. If you aren't actively doing anything that upsets rights holders, they'll leave you alone.
-
No, but you can learn it
So, don't release albums, release tutorials?
-
Our government allows ludicrous control to rights holders. I don't own any copies of movies, for example, even discs. Disney owns the physical discs. I just have them in my home. I own the right to play the discs in certain ways. I'll bet policies will be updated to clarify that Disney doesn't approve of, "training AI".
But it's the same here. If you aren't actively doing anything that upsets rights holders, they'll leave you alone.
What country?
-
Courts will say "no, that's not what we meant by that" and will slap you silly.
AI companies aren't on the side of copyright reform or abolition, they just want an exception for themselves so they can keep doing whatever they're doing now. (And they also want more IP laws to cover the current grey areas, so they can stop pretending to give a damn about open models)
The post isn’t a sound legal argument, but it is an ethical one.
