Steam is cracking down on porn games, to keep Payment Processors happy.
-
Payment platforms have problems with incest and furry content from the looks of that list.
-
Ted Cruz in shambles
No worries, Sex With Hitler is still available for purchase.
-
Hey, no kink shaming!
What happens between two (or more) consenting adults that isn't causing harm to others is none of your business.
Don't like it? Don't do it or watch it or play games themed around it.
And don't be a sad individual who is only able to get joy from shitting on things others like. Because that life only ends in you dying miserable and alone, with nobody to mourn your passing and the last time your name is spoken being by the priest who rushes through a form-letter eulogy to get you sent off to the beyond as quick as possible.
It does extend to others since they put animated, innocent "kid-friendly" looking porn on imageboards.
And yes it's akin to beastialty which is vile. Why else would you dress up like an animal?
-
Oh let people enjoy stuff you don't agree with
Sure. You like beastialty too?
-
This might sound like a good idea. But it is not, since lets say some topic is too sensitive for the payment processor, then they have monopoly on what game can and can not be allowed on Steam.
So in the long run, this is a bad idea.
-
You don’t have to like it, I’m certainly not into it. Still failing to see how it not being for you justifies puritanical bans
It's not puritanical when the subject hints at beastialty. If you want to fuck animals, seek help.
-
It's not puritanical when the subject hints at beastialty. If you want to fuck animals, seek help.
Does a diaper wearing fetish predispose someone to pedophilia? This reeks of slippery slope fallacy
-
On the one hand, oh noz, the incest games. Who will live without the low effort AI goon crap?
On the other hand, why do the payment companies get to dictate what sales are made? It's my fucking money, or my fucking store. It's not the job of the payment processors to determine if I'm buying illegal goods, just that the money goes from me to the store.
-
Does a diaper wearing fetish predispose someone to pedophilia? This reeks of slippery slope fallacy
They probably do wear diapers aswell.
-
It's only a matter of time before they come for furry stuff. They did it with fansly. It's apparently "simulated bestiality" and from what I've heard you aren't even allowed to reference trans puppy girls, pup play, etc without getting banned.
That's different than cub stuff right?
-
They probably do wear diapers aswell.
Some, maybe. Regardless, if two consenting adults want to pretend to be animals or even pretend to be kids while they hump I really don’t see a problem.
-
Some, maybe. Regardless, if two consenting adults want to pretend to be animals or even pretend to be kids while they hump I really don’t see a problem.
wrote last edited by [email protected]That's the fucking thing. It's played up to the point that kids might find it and like it.
It wouldn't be a problem if they didn't fucking have conventions celebrating it. With kids.
Or, you know. On FUCKING STEAM.
-
On the one hand, oh noz, the incest games. Who will live without the low effort AI goon crap?
On the other hand, why do the payment companies get to dictate what sales are made? It's my fucking money, or my fucking store. It's not the job of the payment processors to determine if I'm buying illegal goods, just that the money goes from me to the store.
Why shouldn't the payment processors get a say in the payments they process? Illegal or not, why should they be forced to process payments that facilitate things against their beliefs?
Steam could pursue other payment processing possibilities instead of acquiescing to their demands.
-
Sure. You like beastialty too?
Oh damn, ya got me
-
That's the fucking thing. It's played up to the point that kids might find it and like it.
It wouldn't be a problem if they didn't fucking have conventions celebrating it. With kids.
Or, you know. On FUCKING STEAM.
It’s kind of messy because I think there is a subset of the fandom where it isn’t necessarily sexualized. Like, Khajit and Argonians from Elder Scrolls are pretty much furries but they’re not explicitly sexual. Feel like I’m getting over my skis in terms of my understanding of that fandom since I’m not in that world. No idea how if at all those cons keep the kid safe stuff separate from the sex shit, if at all.
-
That's the fucking thing. It's played up to the point that kids might find it and like it.
It wouldn't be a problem if they didn't fucking have conventions celebrating it. With kids.
Or, you know. On FUCKING STEAM.
-
Why shouldn't the payment processors get a say in the payments they process? Illegal or not, why should they be forced to process payments that facilitate things against their beliefs?
Steam could pursue other payment processing possibilities instead of acquiescing to their demands.
Because corporate religions are obviously more important than individual religions and beliefs. It goes against my beliefs to pay overdraft fees. Do you think that shit would hold up? They are constantly changing the rules that you have to follow and enforcing their will on everyone whether they use their service or not.
Religion is vile.
-
Good. That shit is vile.
Thank you for your contribution, it's suitably appreciated.
-
Nah nah, it's going to get banned, because the politicians dont need to pretend with virtual lolis /s/
I hate that this comment is too close to reality.
-
This might sound like a good idea. But it is not, since lets say some topic is too sensitive for the payment processor, then they have monopoly on what game can and can not be allowed on Steam.
So in the long run, this is a bad idea.
This doesn't sound like a good idea in any way. Why the fuck do banks get to say how my money is used? They can literally eat my shit.
