Trump's Gaza plan will be seen as flying in face of international law
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You mean a convicted felon?
Surely a convicted felon would never do something like break international laws.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Though I give him some credit for negotiating US withdrawal from Afghanistan
He negotiated with the Taliban and didn't include the actual Afghan government in the discussion. He setup an intentional clusterfuck to take place after the election in the event of his loss. No credit is deserved for this.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I disagree.
That was a two-decade war that, had any other politician been elected, would have continued in perpetuity. I frankly couldn't care less if the withdrawal was botched. That was better than the alternative.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
And Jordan is the "nice" neighbor of Israel.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I'm sure that's part of it.
America loves wartime presidents.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Setting aside Trump, if Netanyahu could do that he wouldn't have waited for so long.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Man that's some fucking weasel wording. Will be seen as flying in the face of international law? That would be because it blatantly does.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Wasn't the actual Afghan government a terminally corrupt failure? There's a reason the Taliban took over the country that fast.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Do we? For a bit maybe, but after a few years we aren't happy when it wasn't the "20 minute adventure" we were sold.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Pretty rich coming from the the BBC genocide corporation.
-
Yeah rememeber when kamalacaust promised to oppose genocide and colonialism? lmao libs.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Who's saying that? Got any links?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It is hard for me to believe...
You should check out the history of the USA sometime.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Wasn’t the actual Afghan government a terminally corrupt failure?
Yeah but you could say that about any imperial puppet.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You could have searched yourself. This took seconds.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I doubt he's able to, but he would also have an interest in prolonging conflict because that helps secure his own position.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Their high morality was false, their allegiance was to wealth, their workers were enslaved and their genius was bought.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The United States has been at war for 222 out of 239 years since its birth in 1776. This means that the U.S. has only been at peace for less than 20 years total since its birth.
https://shunculture.com/article/how-long-has-the-united-states-been-at-war
-
A major factor in the country falling is because the US didn't include the Afghan government in the discussions to release 5000 Taliban fighters right before leaving the country.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The thing is, he had his whole presidency to pull out of Afghanistan, and then didn't. All he did was negotiate a political time bomb for his predecessor. Biden is the one who actually pulled the troops out. You should care that it was botched because it was done so on purpose, by Trump, at the negotiating table. Credit for actually pulling out goes too Biden.
