Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Microblog Memes
  3. Save The Planet

Save The Planet

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Microblog Memes
microblogmemes
305 Posts 145 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sabrew4k3@lazysoci.alS [email protected]
    This post did not contain any content.
    X This user is from outside of this forum
    X This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #225

    Doesn't seem to be a waste of power to me.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • A [email protected]

      Ok now go just one step further and ask yourself what variables factor into this.

      There's a reason that pattern exists, and it isn't because solar and cooling hours don't align.

      sqw@lemmy.sdf.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
      sqw@lemmy.sdf.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #226

      the difference between demand and net demand in that graph is purely solar/wind generation, isn't it?

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • E [email protected]

        And including the word "fuck" in your query no longer stops it.

        merc@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
        merc@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #227

        And when it did it also altered the results, making them worse, because it was trying to satisfy "fuck" as part of your search.

        P E 2 Replies Last reply
        5
        • vetoftheseas@discuss.onlineV [email protected]

          Oh, and you don't want it and want the stupid model? You can still buy it for 3x the price.

          tlaloc_temporal@lemmy.caT This user is from outside of this forum
          tlaloc_temporal@lemmy.caT This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #228

          Do the new models even have non-"smart" fittings? I thought all the electronic chip plants closed during covid.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J [email protected]

            So you think they're all at full load at all times? Does that seem reasonable to you?

            F This user is from outside of this forum
            F This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #229

            Given that cloud providers are desperately trying to get more compute resources, but are limited by chip production - yes, of course? Why do you think they're trying to expand their resources while their existing resources aren't already limited?

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F [email protected]

              Given that cloud providers are desperately trying to get more compute resources, but are limited by chip production - yes, of course? Why do you think they're trying to expand their resources while their existing resources aren't already limited?

              J This user is from outside of this forum
              J This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #230

              Because they want the majority of the new chips for training models, not running the existing ones would be my assertion. Two different use cases

              F 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M [email protected]

                What tools do you think capitalism is going to use to fuck us harder and faster than ever before?

                J This user is from outside of this forum
                J This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #231

                All of them at their disposal, we should get rid of all tools

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P [email protected]

                  When I’m told there’s power issues and to conserve power I drop my AC to 60 and leave all my lights on. Only way for them to fix the grid is to break it.

                  bilb@lemmy.mlB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bilb@lemmy.mlB This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #232

                  wow based

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  8
                  • J [email protected]

                    Because they want the majority of the new chips for training models, not running the existing ones would be my assertion. Two different use cases

                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #233

                    Sure, and that's why many cloud providers - even ones that don't train their own models - are only slowly onboarding new customers onto bigger models. Sure. Makes total sense.

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • I [email protected]

                      Do you have a source for the cooling off effect of the duck curve?

                      Following is a 2 year old article hinting an increase in the effect https://www.powermag.com/epri-head-duck-curve-now-looks-like-a-canyon/ afaik it hasn't changed much but I'm open to news

                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #234

                      I'm not really saying that the curve itself is changing (sorry, I was really not clear), only that those other variables reduce actual energy demand later in the day because of the efficiency gains and thermal banking that happens during the peak energy production. The overproduction during max solar hours is still a problem. Even if the utility doesn't have a way of banking the extra supply, individual customers can do it themselves at a smaller scale, even if just by over-cooling their homes to reduce their demand after sundown.

                      Overall, the problem of the duck curve isn't as much about maxing out the grid, it's about the utility not having instantaneous power availability when the sun suddenly goes down. For people like me who work from home and have the flexibility to keep my home cool enough to need less cooling in the evening, having solar power means I can take advantage of that free energy and bank it to reduce my demand in the evening.

                      I get what you were saying now, but having solar would absolutely reduce my demand during peak hours.

                      I 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L [email protected]

                        Didn't some legislation come out banning making laws against AI? (which I realize is a fucking crazy sentence in the first place- nothing besides rights should just get immunity to all potential new laws)

                        So the cities aren't even the bad guys here. The Senate is.

                        corkyskog@sh.itjust.worksC This user is from outside of this forum
                        corkyskog@sh.itjust.worksC This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #235

                        From what I can tell it got stripped from the Senate version that was just approved. They barely have the heads to pass it, so they aren't going to play volleyball to add it back.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • sqw@lemmy.sdf.orgS [email protected]

                          the difference between demand and net demand in that graph is purely solar/wind generation, isn't it?

                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #236

                          Essentially, yea. That, and reduced demand from people setting their thermostats to relax their cooling temps while they're away from home. We should honestly be grateful that we're able to produce so much more energy from solar than what we need for active cooling. It's a good problem to have.

                          sqw@lemmy.sdf.orgS 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • merc@sh.itjust.worksM [email protected]

                            Worse is Google that insists on shoving a terrible AI-based result in your face every time you do a search, with no way to turn it off.

                            I'm not telling these systems to generate images of cow-like girls, but I'm getting AI shoved in my face all the time whether I want it or not. (I don't).

                            R This user is from outside of this forum
                            R This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #237

                            There is a way to "turn it off" with some search parameters. However there is no guarantee that the AI is not consuming resources at the backend.

                            merc@sh.itjust.worksM 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • A [email protected]

                              Essentially, yea. That, and reduced demand from people setting their thermostats to relax their cooling temps while they're away from home. We should honestly be grateful that we're able to produce so much more energy from solar than what we need for active cooling. It's a good problem to have.

                              sqw@lemmy.sdf.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                              sqw@lemmy.sdf.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #238

                              that thermostat factor reduces actual demand by a little, doesn't impact the net difference per se.

                              A 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • F [email protected]

                                Sure, and that's why many cloud providers - even ones that don't train their own models - are only slowly onboarding new customers onto bigger models. Sure. Makes total sense.

                                J This user is from outside of this forum
                                J This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #239

                                I mean do you actually know or are you just assuming?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • sqw@lemmy.sdf.orgS [email protected]

                                  that thermostat factor reduces actual demand by a little, doesn't impact the net difference per se.

                                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #240

                                  From the pov of the utility, sure. But in terms of absolute energy use it's possibly the only way to account for that fluctuation.

                                  This is why this debate is so frustrating - producing energy from solar is of huge benefit, but instead of talking about how best to put that production to use, we're talking about the problem it creates for utilities who don't want to adapt to the distributed production.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • R [email protected]

                                    There is a way to "turn it off" with some search parameters. However there is no guarantee that the AI is not consuming resources at the backend.

                                    merc@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    merc@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #241

                                    Also the search parameters are undocumented internal things that can change or be disabled at any time.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    2
                                    • T [email protected]

                                      I have llama 3.2 on my phone and it's really funny because it's so low powered and dumb but so sweet.

                                      it's like a little friend to talk to when I don't have Internet. he's a lil stupid but he got the spirit

                                      X This user is from outside of this forum
                                      X This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #242

                                      That's cute!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A [email protected]

                                        We're going away folks, and nothing of any true value will be lost, except all the species that did live in homeostasis with the Earth that we're taking with us in our species' avarice induced murder-suicide

                                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #243

                                        Carlin had some good material, but this is an absolutely stupid mindset. We can cause an extreme level of ecological damage. Will the planet eventually recover? Quite possibly. But that's not a certainty, and in the mean time we're triggering a mass extinction precisely because irresponsible humans figure there's no way we can hurt the Earth and it's self-important hubris to think that we can.

                                        But the time we're living through and the time we're heading into are all the proof we should need that it's actually hubris to assume our actions have no meaningful impact.

                                        surp@lemmy.worldS captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.comC K 3 Replies Last reply
                                        13
                                        • merc@sh.itjust.worksM [email protected]

                                          Worse is Google that insists on shoving a terrible AI-based result in your face every time you do a search, with no way to turn it off.

                                          I'm not telling these systems to generate images of cow-like girls, but I'm getting AI shoved in my face all the time whether I want it or not. (I don't).

                                          jjmoldy@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jjmoldy@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #244

                                          I am trying to understand what Google's motivation for this even is. Surely it is not profitable to be replacing their existing, highly lucrative product with an inferior alternative that eats up way more power?

                                          A W D 3 Replies Last reply
                                          7
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups