Decentralised social media offers an alternative to big tech platforms like X and Meta. How does it work? Podcast
-
I mean sure maybe some of the huger instances have more hardware behind em. Mine works well most of the time, but I do run into issues often enough that I feel like we aren’t on par with Reddit.
And I don’t expect it to be, and I’m fine with it. My admin is running it himself for free (to me) afaik, and I like the guy, so I ain’t complaining.
The UX of lemmy on the whole is also worse; seeing the same post fifteen times because someone blasted it to multiple instances and communities does get old.
Guess I’m not allowed to be critical even though I literally said I’m fine with it all.
️ -
I would disagree. The default UI might feel shoddy, but using apps and custom UIs like tesseract or photon and it really doesn’t look shoddy at all.
-
as an instance admin I will let you know that lemmy (the software) runs very very poorly.
-
Just saw the other day that the Pixelfed developer pushed out a new feature pretty quickly and it reminded me of how much faster you can push new features out when you're working on a small team with very few developers.
Then I realised that... At the place I work at (an app most likely installed on your phone) - well every change will have a huge impact. If 0.05% of the users' performance is degraded - that's a shit ton of users. So we have processes in place. We test on all kinds of devices before releasing.
Running a high quality service at scale is hard and it's expensive and it's not always fun because you have to leave your cowboy developer guns at home and do the homework before pushing to production.
-
Brother I feel that. Half the incidents over the past month have been p90 latency issues because someone pushed a bad query to prod.
That’s why I’m not interested in running any fediverse stuff; maybe a few years ago it would have been fun, but I’m just not in the mood to do work and then do unpaid work.
I will say the Pixelfed app feels pretty damn nice, though.
-
You mean networks dont just manage themselves?
-
People place convenience too high on their priority list when figuring out what services to use.
-
Crazy right? I’m sure AI will solve this for us this year 🥴
-
I mostly only use Lemmy but my instance has great up time and running out of new posts is not a bad thing to me considering how addicted I was to reddit (and admittedly now to Lemmy.
I have a Mastadon account but considering I lost interest in Twitter ~15 years ago I'm just not into the format.
-
You guys had very bad luck with the database, but other instances didn't have such problems.
-
I came from Reddit, strong disagree. I think the lemmy UI is far cleaner than reddit. Bluesky is way better than twitter and is technically decentralized.
Mastodon, for sure is a bit shitty with little thought put into discovery.
-
Agreed. I don't use Bluesky much either but when I do it's always leagues better than Mastadon. I get the issues but from an ease-of-use view it's clearly superior. It's time we stop seeing mastadon as the flagship software of the fediverse. Realistically it's going to be pixelfed or maybe Loops, with Lemmy being a bit more niche. Which I think is fine and to be expected given the format and traits transactional as a second tier in mass appeal.
-
Lemmy on Voyager is flawless as fuck.
In fact I have been lately on Bluesky and spending much more time there these days, since people who I respect say “it’s an open standard” and “a true bulwark to the next Musk or whoever wants to buy it”, but I regularly find myself wondering, “what am I looking for here [on Bluesky]?”
The anonymity of reddit type platforms, of which Lemmy is the most future proof, is highly preferable. Bluesky (Twitter/Xitter, etc) feels lie a bunch of ‘identities’ wanting on some level to get the karma their post deserves plus the karma their identity ‘deserves’
-
You didn't ten years ago. Give it time. Be the change.
-
Mostly just talked about Mastodon. And the researcher thinks Bluesky is on the same path as Twitter, given its venture capital investors.
Analogy he used was comparing fediverse to e-mail, and how successful that was.
-
So you are saying Lemmy can't compete because we don't have enough Nazis? Weird take.
This fallacy that you can have a wide range of viewpoints anymore is dead, and is parroted by folks that miss the days of yelling at people on the Internet. However, Trump has taken his cult far enough Right they are beyond meaningful discussion/debate. You can't debate things that aren't even based in reality, and when you call them on it they dismiss it as hearsay/honest mistake/do your research.
For example, the media called Musk on his quote of the US sending $50 million worth of condoms to Gaza. His response was nonsense.
"Some of the things that I say will be incorrect, and should be corrected. So, nobody’s going to bat a thousand. I mean, any – you know, we will make mistakes, but we’ll act quickly to correct any mistakes.”
-
For sure. I am starting communities on stuff I want to talk about.
-
So you are saying Lemmy can't compete because we don't have enough Nazis?
I'm saying that comments outside of a very narrow world view on Lemmy are greeted with hostility. Like the comment I'm replying to.
This covers lots of different areas. I get downvotes and snarky comments when I say I like the wrong Lemmy client or browser. When I ask about suggestions for a ttrpg, I get a snarky comment saying I'm asking questions wrong. When the leader of the Canadian Conservative party comes up in conversation, saying he does anything effectively is met with snark and downvotes - not that he's good, but that he's effective at something.
I understand this is a shitty time in US politics. I don't like the outcome either - Trump is gonna make my life worse, and I don't live in the US. But look at your comments on this thread: they're hostile towards people that probably agree with you. This kind of rage makes the platform unwelcoming and shitty.
-
I took your comment to mean you didn't think we had enough Nazis on Lemmy, to which I will respond hostile towards. If you are anti-Nazi then you should not use the idea of an anti-Nazi comment to illustrate this fake idea of to narrow of political viewpoints on Lemmy.
Also, debating fascism is a whole different thing than people giving you shit over your choice of browser or Lemmy client. You shouldn't conflate the two.
-
I don't think any comments in this thread have referred to Nazis or fascism, other than yours. Nobody here is disagreeing that those things are bad.
I used your comment as an illustration that Lemmy has a tiny Overton window: when anyone comments outside the window, they're smacked down. Instead of asking the original commenter for clarification, your comment suggested they want Nazis on the platform. That was a good illustration of my point.
Your comments in this thread only make sense if you assume the worst about other Lemmites. Please don't do that. If there's ambiguity, there's no need to assume we're douche wagons. Maybe ask for clarification. Make a friendly joke? I dunno.
