Google is on the Wrong Side of History.
-
GO BACK TO SENDING PIECES OF PAPER IN THE MAILBOX YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT /s
I ALREADY DO GOD DAMMIT! (Seriously I have pen pals. I write letters every year. I'm actually late and need to write them!)
-
And if there is one uniting principle in conservatism, the singular reason why religious dirt-poor common-clay-of-the-West support billionaires, is that they all deeply believe in hierarchies.
Why do they go after trans-women but not trans-men? Because men are naturally higher in the hierarchy than women, thus wanting to exist in male spaces (but not actually crossing into them) is seen as the proper order, whereas wanting to exist in female spaces (read: lowering yourself in the hierarchy) is seen as unnatural.
Why do they fellate the rich? Because the wealthy are better people, which is tautologically why they're rich.
Why are they racist? Because white people are better than not-white people, natch.
Why do they hate atheists? Because the very concept of religion implicitly enforces hierarchy. Sectarian disputes are just an offshoot of this.
Progressives are much the same way, but with different hierarchies. Progressives seem to love big government hierarchies which a strong executive branch enforcing a bunch of regulations.
That's what you get from a two party system, you get two groups with a fetish for different types of hierarchies.
Reject hierarchy and push for local rule, it's what we in the box like to call liberty.
-
I ALREADY DO GOD DAMMIT! (Seriously I have pen pals. I write letters every year. I'm actually late and need to write them!)
Get on it.
-
That's why I just upgraded my subscription to Proton. (YES I KNOW ABOUT ALL THE DRAMA WITH THEIR CEO!!! AT LEAST THEY'RE NOT SELLING AI SERVICES TO MILITARY CONTRACTORS, DOING MASS SURVEILLANCE OR SELLING MY FUCKING DATA!)
I switched to Tuta for email and calendar and other services for other products. I try to avoid putting too many eggs in a given basket.
-
Capitalism is amoral
Unfortunately alternatives aren't any better...
-
No ethical consumption under capitalism, yep.
Leave such takes for .ml, please.
-
Unfortunately alternatives aren't any better...
Your right.
Change is difficult so we should just give up.
-
Progressives are much the same way, but with different hierarchies. Progressives seem to love big government hierarchies which a strong executive branch enforcing a bunch of regulations.
That's what you get from a two party system, you get two groups with a fetish for different types of hierarchies.
Reject hierarchy and push for local rule, it's what we in the box like to call liberty.
You're conflating two unrelated things to make some weird anti-government point.
Conservatives believe that hierarchical structures are the natural order of things. That is, things on top of the hierarchy deserve to be there, because otherwise they'd be at the bottom. Conservatism as a political philosophy requires the belief that some people are just better than others.
A belief that a strong government is required to enforce equality in the population is nothing like that.
-
Progressives are much the same way, but with different hierarchies. Progressives seem to love big government hierarchies which a strong executive branch enforcing a bunch of regulations.
That's what you get from a two party system, you get two groups with a fetish for different types of hierarchies.
Reject hierarchy and push for local rule, it's what we in the box like to call liberty.
How in the hell is wanting strong regulations the same thing as believing in racial suppremacy?
-
It's a capitalist corporation that sold its soul to the highest bidder. Of course it's evil. It's based on greed and exploitation.
Billionaire bad?? How could this be!!? I was told whenever two parties entered into a voluntary agreement it meant both of them mutually improved their situation and that if you got billions out of it, it meant by definition that you did a lot of good!
-
Billionaire bad?? How could this be!!? I was told whenever two parties entered into a voluntary agreement it meant both of them mutually improved their situation and that if you got billions out of it, it meant by definition that you did a lot of good!
Here's a gun to your head, now, it would be beneficial to you to hand over your wallet m'kay?
No bullet in your brain, more cash in my hand, both parties benefit! See how that works?
Oh, you have a lump growing in your thyroid, mmmm.... that is bad. We can cut that out for you and most people we do that to live a lot longer, but first we need you to mortgage your home and give us the proceeds. See how that works?
-
There are some offsetting factors that also prevent the "best and brightest" from rising to power: https://dealbreaker.com/2007/10/icahn-explains-why-are-there-so-many-idiots-running-shit
He moves up the corporate ladder, without a single original idea that might make his boss feel threatened by his potential.
Eventually, he gets to be the #2 guy at the company. He's a little dumber than the C.E.O., but the board likes him, so he eventually gets to be C.E.O.
Of course, he assigns a #2 who is a little dumber than he is. "And eventually, we're going to have all morons running our companies," Icahn concluded. "We might not be that far off from that right now."
-
This post did not contain any content.
And has been so for over a decade at least, probably two
-
How in the hell is wanting strong regulations the same thing as believing in racial suppremacy?
I didn't say it was. I said it's a similar fetish for hierarchy, just a different kind.
-
You're conflating two unrelated things to make some weird anti-government point.
Conservatives believe that hierarchical structures are the natural order of things. That is, things on top of the hierarchy deserve to be there, because otherwise they'd be at the bottom. Conservatism as a political philosophy requires the belief that some people are just better than others.
A belief that a strong government is required to enforce equality in the population is nothing like that.
Progressivism is the other side of that coin, a belief that we need strong hierarchy with the "right people" at the top to have a functioning society. It's the same basic idea that we either need or deserve strong leadership.
For some reason those two are being pitched at the only valid ideas, probably because those at the top benefit from people believing that. There are other ideas, they just don't have that "quick solution" people seem to crave that only comes from top down control.
Just because one side of the coin is bad doesn't make the other side good. Get a better coin.
-
This is why the stock market was, fundamentally, a trojan horse. It was created so capitalism could intertwine the peoples wealth and retirement funds to the success of the wealth of the oligarchy, making the entire market too big to fail.
Now the entire system is designed to prevent damage to companies, no matter how moral, unethical, or criminal. The success of corporations IS treated as equal to "national security".
In the end, the stock market is a natural logical progression from the starts of capitalism, and the situation we are in today is again closer to capitalism logical conclusion
From capitalism's basic principles, profit above literally everything was always bound to happen. Just how evolution happens through natural selection. It's a similar process. Because ultimately capitalism is an economic system built on competition, not cooperation.
-
Unfortunately alternatives aren't any better...
They very much are, there's just little to no political will to implement them
-
This post did not contain any content.
Been that way since before the “Don’t be evil” slogan was removed in 2018.
-
Been that way since before the “Don’t be evil” slogan was removed in 2018.
That's just when they let the mask slip. It's not like they were saints up til that point.
-
Fuck them
Fuck what they stand for and implemented. The technologies developed are useful but the maliciousness of it ruins everything. So fuck that part of them.
