Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Lemmy Shitpost
  3. Not for me, tho

Not for me, tho

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Lemmy Shitpost
lemmyshitpost
69 Posts 50 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F [email protected]

    2 is overrated tbh 2bh

    F This user is from outside of this forum
    F This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    2 is overrate8d tbh 2bh

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • D [email protected]

      Actually, it's 5 4 10 12 2 9 8 11 6 7 3 1 for me, but too lazy to edit the image

      theimpressivex@piefed.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      theimpressivex@piefed.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #26

      It's 9 o'clock somewhere!

      1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • D [email protected]

        Actually, it's 5 4 10 12 2 9 8 11 6 7 3 1 for me, but too lazy to edit the image

        tetris11@lemmy.mlT This user is from outside of this forum
        tetris11@lemmy.mlT This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by [email protected]
        #27

        Which language provides the most random alphabetically sorted sequence?

        Data
        |  N | Eng | Dut | Ger | Tur | Chi | Lex |
        |----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----|
        |  1 |   8 |   8 |   8 |   6 |   8 |   1 |
        |  2 |  11 |   3 |   3 |   5 |   2 |  10 |
        |  3 |   5 |   1 |   1 |   1 |   9 |  11 |
        |  4 |   4 |  11 |  11 |   9 |   6 |  12 |
        |  5 |   9 |   9 |   5 |   4 |   3 |   2 |
        |  6 |   1 |  10 |   9 |   2 |   4 |   3 |
        |  7 |   7 |  12 |   6 |  10 |   7 |   4 |
        |  8 |   6 |   2 |   7 |  11 |  10 |   5 |
        |  9 |  10 |   4 |   4 |  12 |  12 |   6 |
        | 10 |   3 |   5 |  10 |   8 |  11 |   7 |
        | 11 |  12 |   6 |   2 |   3 |   5 |   8 |
        | 12 |   2 |   7 |  12 |   7 |   1 |   9 |
        

        Sourced from comments in thread (English from image, Dutch from [email protected], German from [email protected] , Turkish from some rando, Chinese from [email protected], Lexicographical from [email protected])

        Plot with Correlation Scores

        We will compute the pearson correlation (r-statistic) score by comparing the base number (column 1) with the corresponding language column. We will also compute the Serial correlation, by creating staggered columns that measure how close a number is in a sequence to the one before it.

        ::: spoiler Staggered Table

        cat alphabetic.tab \
            | awk '{print $0"\t"prE"\t"prD"\t"prG"\t"prT"\t"prC"\t"prL;prE=$2;prD=$3;prG=$4;prT=$5;prC=$6;prL=$7}' \
            | tee alphabetic.tab.stagger
        

        :::

        ::: spoiler Plot Code

        gnuplot -p -e '
          set xlabel "Base Sequence";
          set ylabel "Alphabetic";
          set xtics 1,1,12;
          set ytics 1,1,12;
          set title "Alphabetic Number Plot with Correlation Score";
          set rmargin 25; set key at graph 1.5,0.9;
          set size ratio 0.45;
        
          stats "alphabetic.tab.stagger" using 1:2 name "E";
          stats "" using 1:3 name "D";
          stats "" using 1:4 name "G";
          stats "" using 1:5 name "T";
          stats "" using 1:6 name "C";
          stats "" using 1:7 name "L";
          
          stats "" using 2:8 name "ES";
          stats "" using 3:9 name "DS";
          stats "" using 4:10 name "GS";
          stats "" using 5:11 name "TS";
          stats "" using 6:12 name "CS";
          stats "" using 7:13 name "LS";
        
          set label 1 sprintf("%10s  %6s  %6s", "", "Base", "Stagger") at graph 1.07,0.95;
        
          plot "" using 1:2 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "English", E_correlation, ES_correlation),
               "" using 1:3 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Dutch", D_correlation, DS_correlation),
               "" using 1:4 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "German", G_correlation, GS_correlation),
               "" using 1:5 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Turkish", T_correlation, TS_correlation),
               "" using 1:6 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Chinese", C_correlation, CS_correlation),
               "" using 1:7 with lines lw 1 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Lexicon", L_correlation, LS_correlation)
        '
        

        :::

        It looks like Dutch has the lowest (near 0) correlation to both the base sequence and it's own staggered sequence, with Turkish mirroring it's staggered randomness somewhat.

        The least random alphabetic sequences are English and German.


        Updated: Added chinese and staggered analysis.

        J F null@slrpnk.netN D R 5 Replies Last reply
        57
        • R [email protected]

          The numbers are sorted by their English spellings.

          D This user is from outside of this forum
          D This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #28

          Is it a meme or a riddle?

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
            infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #29

            If it makes you feel better I did the same lol

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • W [email protected]

              You're missing the lack of logic, aka you're not missing shit, OP has some soul searching to do.

              gerryflap@feddit.nlG This user is from outside of this forum
              gerryflap@feddit.nlG This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #30

              What lack of logic? The numbers on the clock are sorted based on the alphabetical order when they're spelled out in English. Just like with a real clock, the top number is the highest, not the lowest. That seems quite logical to me

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tetris11@lemmy.mlT [email protected]

                Which language provides the most random alphabetically sorted sequence?

                Data
                |  N | Eng | Dut | Ger | Tur | Chi | Lex |
                |----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----|
                |  1 |   8 |   8 |   8 |   6 |   8 |   1 |
                |  2 |  11 |   3 |   3 |   5 |   2 |  10 |
                |  3 |   5 |   1 |   1 |   1 |   9 |  11 |
                |  4 |   4 |  11 |  11 |   9 |   6 |  12 |
                |  5 |   9 |   9 |   5 |   4 |   3 |   2 |
                |  6 |   1 |  10 |   9 |   2 |   4 |   3 |
                |  7 |   7 |  12 |   6 |  10 |   7 |   4 |
                |  8 |   6 |   2 |   7 |  11 |  10 |   5 |
                |  9 |  10 |   4 |   4 |  12 |  12 |   6 |
                | 10 |   3 |   5 |  10 |   8 |  11 |   7 |
                | 11 |  12 |   6 |   2 |   3 |   5 |   8 |
                | 12 |   2 |   7 |  12 |   7 |   1 |   9 |
                

                Sourced from comments in thread (English from image, Dutch from [email protected], German from [email protected] , Turkish from some rando, Chinese from [email protected], Lexicographical from [email protected])

                Plot with Correlation Scores

                We will compute the pearson correlation (r-statistic) score by comparing the base number (column 1) with the corresponding language column. We will also compute the Serial correlation, by creating staggered columns that measure how close a number is in a sequence to the one before it.

                ::: spoiler Staggered Table

                cat alphabetic.tab \
                    | awk '{print $0"\t"prE"\t"prD"\t"prG"\t"prT"\t"prC"\t"prL;prE=$2;prD=$3;prG=$4;prT=$5;prC=$6;prL=$7}' \
                    | tee alphabetic.tab.stagger
                

                :::

                ::: spoiler Plot Code

                gnuplot -p -e '
                  set xlabel "Base Sequence";
                  set ylabel "Alphabetic";
                  set xtics 1,1,12;
                  set ytics 1,1,12;
                  set title "Alphabetic Number Plot with Correlation Score";
                  set rmargin 25; set key at graph 1.5,0.9;
                  set size ratio 0.45;
                
                  stats "alphabetic.tab.stagger" using 1:2 name "E";
                  stats "" using 1:3 name "D";
                  stats "" using 1:4 name "G";
                  stats "" using 1:5 name "T";
                  stats "" using 1:6 name "C";
                  stats "" using 1:7 name "L";
                  
                  stats "" using 2:8 name "ES";
                  stats "" using 3:9 name "DS";
                  stats "" using 4:10 name "GS";
                  stats "" using 5:11 name "TS";
                  stats "" using 6:12 name "CS";
                  stats "" using 7:13 name "LS";
                
                  set label 1 sprintf("%10s  %6s  %6s", "", "Base", "Stagger") at graph 1.07,0.95;
                
                  plot "" using 1:2 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "English", E_correlation, ES_correlation),
                       "" using 1:3 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Dutch", D_correlation, DS_correlation),
                       "" using 1:4 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "German", G_correlation, GS_correlation),
                       "" using 1:5 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Turkish", T_correlation, TS_correlation),
                       "" using 1:6 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Chinese", C_correlation, CS_correlation),
                       "" using 1:7 with lines lw 1 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Lexicon", L_correlation, LS_correlation)
                '
                

                :::

                It looks like Dutch has the lowest (near 0) correlation to both the base sequence and it's own staggered sequence, with Turkish mirroring it's staggered randomness somewhat.

                The least random alphabetic sequences are English and German.


                Updated: Added chinese and staggered analysis.

                J This user is from outside of this forum
                J This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #31

                You put a lot of work into this.

                1 Reply Last reply
                9
                • gerryflap@feddit.nlG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gerryflap@feddit.nlG This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #32

                  I was equally confused initially, but then I looked at the clock in my house and realized that the number up top is the highest number, 12, and not 0. So the first number in the ordering is at the position of the 1 of a normal clock.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  5
                  • tetris11@lemmy.mlT [email protected]

                    Which language provides the most random alphabetically sorted sequence?

                    Data
                    |  N | Eng | Dut | Ger | Tur | Chi | Lex |
                    |----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----|
                    |  1 |   8 |   8 |   8 |   6 |   8 |   1 |
                    |  2 |  11 |   3 |   3 |   5 |   2 |  10 |
                    |  3 |   5 |   1 |   1 |   1 |   9 |  11 |
                    |  4 |   4 |  11 |  11 |   9 |   6 |  12 |
                    |  5 |   9 |   9 |   5 |   4 |   3 |   2 |
                    |  6 |   1 |  10 |   9 |   2 |   4 |   3 |
                    |  7 |   7 |  12 |   6 |  10 |   7 |   4 |
                    |  8 |   6 |   2 |   7 |  11 |  10 |   5 |
                    |  9 |  10 |   4 |   4 |  12 |  12 |   6 |
                    | 10 |   3 |   5 |  10 |   8 |  11 |   7 |
                    | 11 |  12 |   6 |   2 |   3 |   5 |   8 |
                    | 12 |   2 |   7 |  12 |   7 |   1 |   9 |
                    

                    Sourced from comments in thread (English from image, Dutch from [email protected], German from [email protected] , Turkish from some rando, Chinese from [email protected], Lexicographical from [email protected])

                    Plot with Correlation Scores

                    We will compute the pearson correlation (r-statistic) score by comparing the base number (column 1) with the corresponding language column. We will also compute the Serial correlation, by creating staggered columns that measure how close a number is in a sequence to the one before it.

                    ::: spoiler Staggered Table

                    cat alphabetic.tab \
                        | awk '{print $0"\t"prE"\t"prD"\t"prG"\t"prT"\t"prC"\t"prL;prE=$2;prD=$3;prG=$4;prT=$5;prC=$6;prL=$7}' \
                        | tee alphabetic.tab.stagger
                    

                    :::

                    ::: spoiler Plot Code

                    gnuplot -p -e '
                      set xlabel "Base Sequence";
                      set ylabel "Alphabetic";
                      set xtics 1,1,12;
                      set ytics 1,1,12;
                      set title "Alphabetic Number Plot with Correlation Score";
                      set rmargin 25; set key at graph 1.5,0.9;
                      set size ratio 0.45;
                    
                      stats "alphabetic.tab.stagger" using 1:2 name "E";
                      stats "" using 1:3 name "D";
                      stats "" using 1:4 name "G";
                      stats "" using 1:5 name "T";
                      stats "" using 1:6 name "C";
                      stats "" using 1:7 name "L";
                      
                      stats "" using 2:8 name "ES";
                      stats "" using 3:9 name "DS";
                      stats "" using 4:10 name "GS";
                      stats "" using 5:11 name "TS";
                      stats "" using 6:12 name "CS";
                      stats "" using 7:13 name "LS";
                    
                      set label 1 sprintf("%10s  %6s  %6s", "", "Base", "Stagger") at graph 1.07,0.95;
                    
                      plot "" using 1:2 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "English", E_correlation, ES_correlation),
                           "" using 1:3 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Dutch", D_correlation, DS_correlation),
                           "" using 1:4 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "German", G_correlation, GS_correlation),
                           "" using 1:5 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Turkish", T_correlation, TS_correlation),
                           "" using 1:6 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Chinese", C_correlation, CS_correlation),
                           "" using 1:7 with lines lw 1 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Lexicon", L_correlation, LS_correlation)
                    '
                    

                    :::

                    It looks like Dutch has the lowest (near 0) correlation to both the base sequence and it's own staggered sequence, with Turkish mirroring it's staggered randomness somewhat.

                    The least random alphabetic sequences are English and German.


                    Updated: Added chinese and staggered analysis.

                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #33

                    Thank you for doing and sharing this

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    6
                    • V [email protected]

                      Acht, drie, een, elf, negen, tien, twaalf, twee, vier, vijf, zes, zeven.

                      8, 3, 1, 11, 9, 10, 12, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7

                      I This user is from outside of this forum
                      I This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #34

                      I still don't understand how acht=12

                      V rob_t_firefly@lemmy.worldR 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • I [email protected]

                        I still don't understand how acht=12

                        V This user is from outside of this forum
                        V This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #35

                        Ah no I started at one. You can transpose my list by one and set zeven as 12.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • tetris11@lemmy.mlT [email protected]

                          altı beş bir dokuz dört iki on onbir oniki sekiz üç yedi

                          6 5 1 9 4 2 10 11 12 8 3 7

                          I This user is from outside of this forum
                          I This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #36

                          Transliterating from Mandarin Chinese and using English dictionary order

                          Ba Er Jiu Liu Qi San Si Shi ShiEr ShiYi Wu Yi

                          8 2 9 6 3 4 7 10 12 11 5 1
                          八 二 九 六 三 四 七 十 十二 十一 五 一

                          tetris11@lemmy.mlT 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • D [email protected]

                            Actually, it's 5 4 10 12 2 9 8 11 6 7 3 1 for me, but too lazy to edit the image

                            communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzC This user is from outside of this forum
                            communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzC This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #37

                            Interestingly it would be right twice a day

                            R 1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • I [email protected]

                              I still don't understand how acht=12

                              rob_t_firefly@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                              rob_t_firefly@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #38

                              acht=12

                              Gesundheit.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • D [email protected]

                                Actually, it's 5 4 10 12 2 9 8 11 6 7 3 1 for me, but too lazy to edit the image

                                V This user is from outside of this forum
                                V This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #39

                                I recently found out that javascript's .sort() function, when called without arguments on an array of numbers, converts them all to strings and sorts them alphabetically 🤡

                                electrictrombone@lemmy.worldE dasus@lemmy.worldD 2 Replies Last reply
                                20
                                • V [email protected]

                                  I recently found out that javascript's .sort() function, when called without arguments on an array of numbers, converts them all to strings and sorts them alphabetically 🤡

                                  electrictrombone@lemmy.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  electrictrombone@lemmy.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #40

                                  I'm a C programmer. My first time writing Javascript and ran into some sort of bug involving a === sign or something. Javascript is a silly language.

                                  H A D 3 Replies Last reply
                                  11
                                  • communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzC [email protected]

                                    Interestingly it would be right twice a day

                                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #41

                                    I'd think four times:
                                    4:20, 4:35, 7:20, 7:35

                                    communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    5
                                    • D [email protected]

                                      Is it a meme or a riddle?

                                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #42

                                      Just a silly joke, I guess.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R [email protected]

                                        I'd think four times:
                                        4:20, 4:35, 7:20, 7:35

                                        communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #43

                                        I'm stupid and read the clock wrong and didn't check even a little.

                                        B 1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • electrictrombone@lemmy.worldE [email protected]

                                          I'm a C programmer. My first time writing Javascript and ran into some sort of bug involving a === sign or something. Javascript is a silly language.

                                          H This user is from outside of this forum
                                          H This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                                          #44

                                          Javascript lets you compare unlike types without extra steps using ==. If you want strict comparison where “2” isn’t 2, use === and !==. Personally, I find that easier than having to parseint or cast every damn thing or whatever c does (strtol?). That said, I have build tools set up to enforce strict comparison because I don’t trust myself or others.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          4
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups