The Future is NOT Self-Hosted
-
I'm limiting myself to only open source applications on the tablets. Strictly nothing from Play Store or Aurora.
I like KOReader for my Kindle, but it's available for Android too. Have you tried it?
-
The future is community-hosted
Related Hacker News thread:
I'd love to help community host stuff, but I'm terrified of someone posting cp to a server I have or getting breached.
-
The future is community-hosted
Related Hacker News thread:
If you do not have physical access, it is not yours. Trust absolutely no one.
-
The future is community-hosted
Related Hacker News thread:
«legally aquired» lol
-
I like KOReader for my Kindle, but it's available for Android too. Have you tried it?
Yes, KOReader and Librera FD are two applications I use currently.
-
I have bought a few otherwise hard to find books on Amazon. Actual paper books. At least used to be possible.
Yes, when I buy books on Amazon it's the dead tree kind.
-
When you call the shots, you get the outcomes. It's honestly not a bad way to live. Best of luck to ya!
Thanks, it is enough for me.
-
The future is community-hosted
Related Hacker News thread:
This is really cool. And I would say a good replacement for current cloud setups. Since it's unreasonable to expect everyone to self-host.
Although I think this could only really be a cost saving measure since there are already services like protondrive that offer end 2 end encryption. And I would probably trust the reliability of proton drive over the community hosting my stuff. -
The future is community-hosted
Related Hacker News thread:
The future is P2P
-
The future is community-hosted
Related Hacker News thread:
The future is federated.
-
The future is community-hosted
Related Hacker News thread:
wrote last edited by [email protected]Lol. So we trust local governments and communities now?
Has anyone ever worked with them IT wise?
I do so in four different EU countries and know people who do in the US and Canada.
And...well...there is a reason local governments often went towards the cloud services. Do people think Joe Admin in Bumfucknowhere can operate what basically becomes a MiniDC?
And who controls that?Sorry. Either go "host at home" and only fuck up things for oneself.
Or do it properly with a proper DC. Colocate if you want. But that? I know it sounds appealing, especially for someone entering selfhosting (like the author did a few weeks ago).
But there is a reason hosting is a business once it comes to other peoples data. -
Every city should host main public web servicies for its citizens, each one as an instance of a complex system, that's how anarchy works.
wrote last edited by [email protected]That quickly becomes a tragedy of the commons. The city residents pay for it but how do you verify "citizenship"?
-
That quickly becomes a tragedy of the commons. The city residents pay for it but how do you verify "citizenship"?
If every city has the same then why would you even want to?
-
The future is P2P
The presence is P2W.
-
I'd love to help community host stuff, but I'm terrified of someone posting cp to a server I have or getting breached.
Zero-knowledge hosting solutions should help with that, but I'm unsure how the tech and UX has been going for that on FOSS as of yet.
-
That quickly becomes a tragedy of the commons. The city residents pay for it but how do you verify "citizenship"?
If you mean citizenship as being associated to the city whose hosting services you are using, yhe power or water bill pointed at your name and residence should be able to do that. Now, if you want that plus anonimity, the only practical option I can think of for a city-wide physical campaign is some sort of GPG Signature Meetup ("signature party").
-
Instead of building our own clouds, I want us to own the cloud. Keep all of the great parts about this feat of technical infrastructure, but put it in the hands of the people rather than corporations.
I'm talking publicly funded, accessible, at cost cloud-services.I worry that quickly this will follow this path:
- Someone has to pay for it, so it becomes like an HOA of compute. (A Compute Owners Association, perhaps) Everyone contributes, everyone pays their shares
- Now there’s a group making decisions… and they can impose rules voted upon by the group. Not everyone will like that, causing schisms.
- Economies of scale: COA’s get large enough to be more mini-corps and less communal. Now you’re starting to see “subscription fees” no differently than many cloud providers, just with more “ownership and self regulation”
- The people running these find that it takes a lot of work and need a salary. They also want to get hosted somewhere better than someone’s house, so they look for colocation facilities and worry about HA and DR.
- They keep growing and draw the ire of companies for hosting copies of licensed resources. Ownership (which this article says we don’t have anyway) is hard to prove, and lawsuits start flying. The COA has to protect itself, so it starts having to police what’s stored on it. And now it’s no better than what it replaced.
Wouldn't a zero-knowledge hosting solution (you provide hosting, but you can't see what's into it past a stream of binary) help with that?
-
If you mean citizenship as being associated to the city whose hosting services you are using, yhe power or water bill pointed at your name and residence should be able to do that. Now, if you want that plus anonimity, the only practical option I can think of for a city-wide physical campaign is some sort of GPG Signature Meetup ("signature party").
yhe power or water bill pointed at your name and residence
Many people live in cities without owning their house. So they never see those bills. Renters are usually two levels away from the actual owner. Then there are all the people who live and work in cities but aren't official renters.
-
If every city has the same then why would you even want to?
It would have to be a national mandate that is available in every city or everyone would use the free service from one city but not vote to raise the taxes in their city to pay for their own.
If it's a national mandate, then might as well make it a national service.
-
The future is federated.
I would say the future is in pooling resources.
Like it happens with torrents. As one p2p protocol very successful.
Self-hosting not applications, but storage and uniform services. Let different user applications use the same pooled storage and services.
All services are ultimately storage, computation, relays, search&indexing and trackers. So if there's a way to contribute storage, computing resources, search and relay nodes by announcing them via trackers (suppose), then one can make any global networked application using that.
But I'm still thinking how can that even work. What I'm dreaming of is just year 2000 Internet (with FTP, e-mail, IRC, search engines), except simplified and made for machines, with the end result being represented to user by a local application. There should be some way to pay for resources in a uniform way, and reputation of resources (not too good if someone can make a storage service, collect payment, get a "store" request and then just take it offline), or it won't work.
And global cryptographic identities.
Not like Fediverse in the end, more like NOSTR.
