Facebook flags Linux topics as 'cybersecurity threats' — posts and users being blocked
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Are you also assuming that the idi... fine individuals that decide the content policy have any idea how Facebook works?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I wonder if microsoft asked them to do this, either way this is something that shouldnt be ignored. Its basically direct attack and their endgoal might be to make regular people hate or fear linux. That in turn could be used to influence laws and try to ban or limit linux to corporate use only.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
CORPO-FOSS WAR
The great prophet @[email protected] has warned us for this.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I agree. It's like Occam's Razor, but with stupidity instead of simplicity: the most stupid reason is the most likely.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Go and read original Distrowatch post and tell me this doesn’t sound like a plausible and way more boring explanation.
- There is an ongoing US-China trade war that started 2 presidents ago.
- Mark Zuckerberg wants to fellatio Donald Trump (hence dropping pretence of social responsibility)
- Mark Zuckerberg wants to participate in this trade war somehow so he bans mentions of Chinese tech.
- Distrowatch mentions OpenKylin, a Chinese Linux distribution, gets flagged
- Facebook support (person making around $3.5 per month in some third world country) doesn’t know difference between specific Linux distro and Linux itself, tells Distrowatch that Linux is now banned.
- Distrowatch doesn’t research anything and cries foul without second thought because Meta is evil.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I just can't believe. wth?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Macco's Razor. The stupidest possible explanation is probably the right answer.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Schrodinger's Razor:
The answer is both really smart and really stupid, but you won't know which until you look at the source.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Microsoft's Schrodinger's Razor
The answer is both really smart and really stupid, but you won't know which until you look at the source, and you can't view it.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You will own nothing and be happy.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I will dig out my old tails drive just out of spite if they do that.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/10/mark-zuckerberg-joe-rogan-facebook-censorship-biden
Zuckerberg on Rogan: Facebook's censorship was "something out of 1984"
"It really is a slippery slope, and it just got to a point where it's just, OK, this is destroying so much trust, especially in the United States, to have this program."
He said he was "worried" from the beginning about "becoming this sort of decider of what is true in the world." Zuckerberg praised X's "community notes" program as superior to Facebook's model.
Way to tackle censorship, Zuck…
The irony is Facebook is a major contributor to a lot of open source software, and Zuckerberg in particular publicly praised "open" approach of Llama and some other projects.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
it shouldnt be allowed to go there because it might not be reversable by then. I wish I was just paranoid but way the world is going makes this very plausible.
By the time things like that become evident its like trying to stop a boulder that has been gaining momentum for a while, which is why I wish people were more active about doing something instead of waiting until there is clear evidence that something should be done.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Hanlon's razor: Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity (or incompetence).
This works for individuals, but when it comes to corporations, you really have to ask, why not both?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yeah, I'm pretty sure Facebook infra runs on Linux.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Sometimes it's both. As a software dev, I've seen ingenious solutions (heroics, we call them) for problems that could've (and should've) been solved a much simpler way, but wasn't because the dev didn't have the needed context. So both incredibly smart and incredibly dumb.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Weird and shitty, but who gives a fuck about Facebook?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Everyone over the age of 45 and is not tech inclined
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
How many of them give a fuck about Linux?