Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang to meet with Trump at White House

[lemmyfeed@lemmy.world]

You forgot the 1 million dollar bribe donation

[corkyskog@sh.itjust.works]

Idk. Doesn't Deepseek motivate a lot of other companies to try to do something similar? They might end up selling more

[metalmachine@feddit.nl]

You have a point, nvidia did make the 4090D which was a slightly cut-down 4090 to get over the sanctions and continue selling to china.

[bosht@lemmy.world]

Yes, competition is good, but these ball garglers only want to make competition illegal so they can capitalize on monopoly.

[zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone]

Tbh i would consider economics a cult. When you start caring about fractions of fractions of your smallest unit of currency, there's something wrong

[echodot@feddit.uk]

We'll know if he's successful because Trump will start wearing leather jackets.

[fenririii@lemmy.world]

If only 99.9% weren't corrupt bastards

[gwilikers@lemmy.ml]

Absolutely. So much of the libertarian argument for capitalist competition fall apart when faced with the reality of monopolies and oligopolies that control the markets. It's honestly such a farcical ideology.

[techanon@lemm.ee]

Team AMD from now on!

[werefreeatlast@lemmy.world]

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2069436850145993

50 States, 50 Protests, 1day

Feb 5 @ your downtown.

[auli@lemmy.ca]

Don't think so there have been times in the past where AMD has been as good and even better the Nvidia. And it didn't move the needle much. There might have been game issues with AMD then I can't remember

[sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works]

That's a nice straw man you've got there. Where did discussion about libertarianism come from? Are you implying that Trump is somehow libertarian (that joker was booed relentlessly at the LP convention) or that the US is in any way libertarian?

The libertarian argument is that antitrust exists to fix problems the government itself created.

For example, why does Nvidia dominate AI. It's not because they bought all competition, AMD and Intel exist. It's not because their hardware is better, AMD and Intel have access to the same fabs. The main reason is CUDA, Nvidia's GPU compute API, which is protected by copyright, as in, government protectionism. Many libertarians don't believe in IP law, figuring laws against fraud are sufficient, and those that do think it should exist want dramatically shorter protections (e.g. 5 years for patents, 10 for copyright). And then there's the argument of whether copyright should even apply to APIs like CUDA, and many libertarians would say no. If AMD and Intel could create CUDA compatible devices, Nvidia wouldn't have nearly the lead it does.

Also, a proper libertarian government would have so little overlap with the economy that a CEO visiting the White House wouldn't really be a thing because there's nothing to gain from that visit. Presidents shouldn't be selectively tarriffing products, in fact that should be illegal since it's direct market manipulation. If we do tariffs, they should be broad impacting all imports from all countries. The only selective tariffs that should exist would be from something like a carbon tax, where products are forced to pay for pollution generated in their production.

I really don't see what libertarianism has to do with this story (neither Jensen Huang or Donald Trump are anywhere near libertarian), but I'm happy to have a discussion about it.

[sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works]

Not understanding something doesn't make it a cult.

[sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works]

Yup, fantastic Linux support. I don't understand what that has to do with this article though...