'Meta Torrented over 81 TB of Data Through Anna's Archive, Despite Few Seeders' * TorrentFreak
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
In copyright protection terms the ratio shouldn't matter. They should pay for all the lost profits from pirating everything they've downloaded. Every time someone pirated it should be counted. And every time someone uses the AI trained on the data.
They can become the corporate Jesus of the interwebs, having paid for our sins.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Anna's Archive: Mirror our database, help us preserve Humanity's knowledge
Facebook: I'll just torrent what I need, see yaa
These big tech monopolies are a curse to humanity..
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Damn leeches
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I'd almost like to think an LLC would be enough, but I suspect that only works if you also have a billion in VC funding and political connections.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Meta Horizons
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Technically, copyright infringement is committed by the entity making and sending the copy, not the entity receiving it. Leeching could indeed remove liability.
I'm not sure if the courts have cared about that nuance when persecuting the 'small fish,' but I bet they would in this 'big fish' case.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Oh for sure, since the law is basically toilet paper for billionaires at this point.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
$250k * [every book in existence] is literally nothing?
Remember, "offense" doesn't mean "per torrent," it means "per copyrighted work infringed."
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If the receiving entity then ingests all that copyrighted material into its AI, and the AI sends it piece at a time to other receiving entities, that should be the AI infringing on everything it is copying to make its answers.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Meta has open sourced every single one of their llms. They essentially gave birth to the whole open llm scene.
If they start losing all these lawsuits, the whole scene dies and all those nifty models and their fine-tunes get removed from huggingface, to be repackaged and sold to us with a subscription fee. All the other domestic open source players will close down.
The copyright crew aren't the good guys here, even if it's spearheaded by Sarah Silverman and Meta has traditionally played the part of the villain.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Meta stole from everyone, including those that struggle to make ends meet, so it doesn’t matter that they gave you back some of it. Any moral qualms should evaporate when you consider that they did it to create shareholder value and the rest is philanthropy (aka pretend tax). As a socialist I believe that man is owed for his work and you can’t take from him even though technology makes it so easy.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yes, yes it should. But that's a different act than the one being discussed here.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
What is Anna’s Archive?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Don't give me that slop. No one except the biggest names are getting a dime out it once OpenAI buys up all the data and kills off their competition. It's also highly transformative, which is perfectly legal.
Copyright laws have been turned into a joke, only protecting big money and their interests.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It’s a popular search engine that works with shadow libraries like Sci-Hub or Library Genesis. Shadow libraries are hosts to copies of works of literature and science. Their legal status is murky at best but it’s incredibly impractical to persecute those accessing them.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
They'll be fined 100k
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
As a socialist I believe intellectual property is a falsehood and technological advancement should be for the public good. Open source LLMs are for the public good.
Given the options between having open source LLMs and the US Govt banning non-corpo non-proprietary LLMs and giving a free pass to people like Musk and Altman and Zucc to monopolize, I happily pick the former.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
So it’s like thepiratebay or 1337x.to but for books?
Also I think you mean prosecuting, not persecuting.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Those are torrents, Annas Archive is typically used for direct downloads.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Thanks. It’s confusing because everyone is talking about torrents. It’s in the title even, but I didn’t read the article.