Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. Mexican President Threatens to Sue Google Over 'Gulf of America' Label on Maps.

Mexican President Threatens to Sue Google Over 'Gulf of America' Label on Maps.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
technology
385 Posts 179 Posters 2.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • viking@infosec.pubV [email protected]

    To an extent. Lemmy is a useful substitute for reddit because it's anonymous, so I don't know and to an extent don't care who I'm talking to. With messenger services it's a different use case, I need the exact people I want to talk to on there, or it's essentially worthless.

    dukethorion@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
    dukethorion@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #371

    Its not completely anonymous when the server admins have your IP.

    viking@infosec.pubV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • dukethorion@lemmy.worldD [email protected]

      Whoa, fella, you can't apply logic and reasoning around here.

      K This user is from outside of this forum
      K This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #372

      True, lol.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • dukethorion@lemmy.worldD [email protected]

        Its not completely anonymous when the server admins have your IP.

        viking@infosec.pubV This user is from outside of this forum
        viking@infosec.pubV This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #373

        True, I meant anonymous in the sense that participants are not generally identifiable by one another.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M [email protected]

          Republicans are so good at baiting liberals into useless bullshit arguments, while they plunder stuff that actually matters.

          theneverfox@pawb.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          theneverfox@pawb.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #374

          I don't think that's fair in this case, she's been killing it. She's been drawing hard lines and meeting Trump blow for blow...

          As for what's important, she got concessions so far. Trump got to claim a win, but she let Trump use a previously negotiated deal while getting the US to commit to cracking down on the flow of guns into Mexico

          And now she's fighting on the bullshit culture war stuff... But you know Mexico speaks a different language and isn't changing the name on their side, right?

          The threats against Google are a threat to crack down on a massive US tech company, which is probably (undoubtedly) related to the threat of delayed tarrifs

          She's playing the game. If only the liberals would wake up and realize the game has changed too

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R [email protected]

            Whatever. Enjoy your rant. It's going to be a fun four years for you

            flyingsquid@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
            flyingsquid@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #375

            Yes, that is one way to show that you never actually read the post.

            R 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D [email protected]

              Can you site something for what you're talking about?

              flyingsquid@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
              flyingsquid@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #376

              https://www.imo.org/en/about/Conventions/Pages/ListOfConventions.aspx

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • V [email protected]

                in their jurisdiction (Mexico) it is actually the "Gulf of Mexico" in Google Maps, they don't get the "Gulf of America" name.

                I'm in Europe and for me it says "Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of America)". 🥴

                M This user is from outside of this forum
                M This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #377

                I've heard that in Germany it's "Golf von Mexiko (Golf von Amerika)". That's really annoying. I can vaguely understand it having the parenthesized name in English. Say in 3 years some kid in England is doing a report about something in the US and the Gulf of America comes up. Maybe you'd want the kid to be able to find it on the map. But, maybe it's fine if the kid has to look it up somewhere else, realize that's the stupid name, then search for Gulf of Amerikkka.

                But, it doesn't make any sense to do that for other languages. Just like we don't get Finland (Suomi) when searching for Finland, Finns shouldn't get something like Meksikonlahti (Gulf of America). They aren't going to be exposed to / hearing the Finnish translation of the English name, so it's not helpful in any way to have that parenthesized version.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • flyingsquid@lemmy.worldF [email protected]

                  Yes, that is one way to show that you never actually read the post.

                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #378

                  You conflate not agreeing with not reading, because if someone reads your posts, they have to agree, right? So if someone doesn't agree, it simply means they didn't read your post.

                  flyingsquid@lemmy.worldF 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R [email protected]

                    You conflate not agreeing with not reading, because if someone reads your posts, they have to agree, right? So if someone doesn't agree, it simply means they didn't read your post.

                    flyingsquid@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                    flyingsquid@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #379

                    You neither agreed with what I said nor disagreed with what I said. You did not address what I said at all. I will give you one last chance, but I doubt you will bother:

                    “Mount McKinley” is “just a name” for what is supposed to be called Denali. Ask an indigenous person if they think changing the name of a sacred mountain to the name of a man responsible for one of them many genocides of their people is “just a name.”

                    Then ask virtually any black person if they don’t care about Trump and Republicans restoring Confederate generals’ names to military bases. Find out if they think it’s “just a name.”

                    So, since you've claimed you addressed it and all you keep saying is, "it's just a name," is your contention that Mount McKinley and Fort Bragg are just names and those people of color shouldn't get so uppity about them?

                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • flyingsquid@lemmy.worldF [email protected]

                      You neither agreed with what I said nor disagreed with what I said. You did not address what I said at all. I will give you one last chance, but I doubt you will bother:

                      “Mount McKinley” is “just a name” for what is supposed to be called Denali. Ask an indigenous person if they think changing the name of a sacred mountain to the name of a man responsible for one of them many genocides of their people is “just a name.”

                      Then ask virtually any black person if they don’t care about Trump and Republicans restoring Confederate generals’ names to military bases. Find out if they think it’s “just a name.”

                      So, since you've claimed you addressed it and all you keep saying is, "it's just a name," is your contention that Mount McKinley and Fort Bragg are just names and those people of color shouldn't get so uppity about them?

                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #380

                      Since you have completely hijacked this from talking about the Gulf, as I said, call it what you want. I'll probably continue to call it Denali, because it's just a name.

                      flyingsquid@lemmy.worldF 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R [email protected]

                        Since you have completely hijacked this from talking about the Gulf, as I said, call it what you want. I'll probably continue to call it Denali, because it's just a name.

                        flyingsquid@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                        flyingsquid@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #381

                        Enjoy your privilege.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • flyingsquid@lemmy.worldF [email protected]

                          https://www.imo.org/en/about/Conventions/Pages/ListOfConventions.aspx

                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #382

                          That's just a list of conventions? I could have looked that up. You're talking about a specific one right?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • flyingsquid@lemmy.worldF [email protected]

                            Did you really just call Taiwan a Chinese province?

                            B This user is from outside of this forum
                            B This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #383

                            It IS a Chinese province. Did you really not know that?
                            Nobody recognises Taiwan as an independent state.
                            Not even the hypocrite US meddling warmongers.

                            flyingsquid@lemmy.worldF 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B [email protected]

                              It IS a Chinese province. Did you really not know that?
                              Nobody recognises Taiwan as an independent state.
                              Not even the hypocrite US meddling warmongers.

                              flyingsquid@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                              flyingsquid@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #384

                              Please inform these countries that they do not exist.

                              https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-that-recognize-taiwan

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P [email protected]

                                I'm curious - how would they just "have phones switch", and if that's actually possible, to which "open non Google platform"?

                                P This user is from outside of this forum
                                P This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #385

                                This is absolutely possible, and how? Depends on lawyers, but technically its absolutely possible

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • System shared this topic on
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups