Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Fediverse
  3. You can see who upvoted and downvoted a post by viewing it in friendica.

You can see who upvoted and downvoted a post by viewing it in friendica.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Fediverse
fediverse
167 Posts 78 Posters 1.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S [email protected]

    How to fo that?

    irelephant@lemm.eeI This user is from outside of this forum
    irelephant@lemm.eeI This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #50

    Asumming you meant "do", go to friendica (friendica.world) and paste the fedilink (press the rainbow button) into the searchbar.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • microw@lemm.eeM This user is from outside of this forum
      microw@lemm.eeM This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #51

      But it has absolutely nothing to do with how it is displayed in Friendica.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P [email protected]

        The server hosting the post needs it.

        It only needs to tell other servers the vote count, and the votes of people on that other server.
        That may not be how it actually works, but that's all that's needed

        S This user is from outside of this forum
        S This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #52

        Yes, but then you can have malicious servers sending fake numbers without other server operators being able to check whether this is at all plausible.

        (It's still possible for malicious servers to send fake votes, but server operators can see which users they are stated to originate from, then block that server if that looks like it's doing that. At least that is my understanding.)

        P W 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • F [email protected]

          Yes, but as long as you don’t reveal your identity, they can’t do much to track you.

          They don’t have access to your IP.

          Of course, it you’re using the same username over multiple services, or reveal identifying information (which is much easier to analyse now due to AI) they will be able to track you.

          rickyrigatoni@lemm.eeR This user is from outside of this forum
          rickyrigatoni@lemm.eeR This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #53

          My name is actually Ricky Rigatoni and I am King of the Brooklyn Mafia.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A This user is from outside of this forum
            A This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #54

            Cant you just defed with them?

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S [email protected]

              Yes, but then you can have malicious servers sending fake numbers without other server operators being able to check whether this is at all plausible.

              (It's still possible for malicious servers to send fake votes, but server operators can see which users they are stated to originate from, then block that server if that looks like it's doing that. At least that is my understanding.)

              P This user is from outside of this forum
              P This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #55

              What do you mean "send fake votes"?
              Or rather, who do you think should be responsible for identifying and blocking fraudulent votes?

              And how do you reconcile votes that come from servers that you've defederated with? Should everyone have the same view of the post, or should people only see votes from servers that their server is federated with? What about votes from users you've personally blocked? Etc

              I personally kinda think that the responsibility is on the server hosting the post, and that everyone should see the same (but anonymous) vote count, of which the hosting server is the single source of truth.

              skulblaka@sh.itjust.worksS 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J [email protected]

                It's the age old argument of "It's not Communism that's bad, it's the human element."

                Speaking as if any system created by humans will ever be free of the human element, which is of course faulty logic.

                Z This user is from outside of this forum
                Z This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #56

                I mean, when the human element is literally not doing communism, yes, that would be a problem.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • irelephant@lemm.eeI [email protected]

                  Upvotes seem to just federate as likes and dislikes.

                  sharkattak@kbin.melroy.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sharkattak@kbin.melroy.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #57

                  I was thinking just now how there seems to be people who downvotes threads for no apparent reason, even seemingly innocuous and neutral ones.. for example "Kingdom Come has sold 2 million units" 3 downvotes; "This New Algorithm for Sorting Books Is Close to Perfection" 5 downvotes; you get the idea. Now everyone is entitled to their opinion, but It makes me wonder if someone(s) is spam downvoting for some motive.

                  W 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sharkattak@kbin.melroy.orgS [email protected]

                    I was thinking just now how there seems to be people who downvotes threads for no apparent reason, even seemingly innocuous and neutral ones.. for example "Kingdom Come has sold 2 million units" 3 downvotes; "This New Algorithm for Sorting Books Is Close to Perfection" 5 downvotes; you get the idea. Now everyone is entitled to their opinion, but It makes me wonder if someone(s) is spam downvoting for some motive.

                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #58

                    Might just be people who are used to having an algorithm so they dislike stuff they don't want to see more of.

                    microw@lemm.eeM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P [email protected]

                      Same was the case on /kbin, and while Mbin got rid of the downvotes, it still has public upvotes.

                      ripcord@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                      ripcord@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #59

                      kbin also got rid of the ability to view downvotes. I believe either before the fork or at least before the implosion while mbin were still mostly just pulling from upstream.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P [email protected]

                        What do you mean "send fake votes"?
                        Or rather, who do you think should be responsible for identifying and blocking fraudulent votes?

                        And how do you reconcile votes that come from servers that you've defederated with? Should everyone have the same view of the post, or should people only see votes from servers that their server is federated with? What about votes from users you've personally blocked? Etc

                        I personally kinda think that the responsibility is on the server hosting the post, and that everyone should see the same (but anonymous) vote count, of which the hosting server is the single source of truth.

                        skulblaka@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
                        skulblaka@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #60

                        A malicious hosting server could use fake points to blast any message to the top of everyone's feeds until manually banned or defederated

                        C P 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • S [email protected]

                          Yes, after all other servers need this information in order to prevent double voting, you can't just have servers sending each other information "somebody upvoted this" and also tell when servers are allowing users to vote more than once.

                          So upvotes and downvotes aren't actually private, never have been, some servers may display them publicly even if most don't.

                          W This user is from outside of this forum
                          W This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #61

                          Over thinking.

                          Only the instance needs the username to register the vote, the count can then be updated by the instance. Simple and lightweight

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J [email protected]

                            It's the age old argument of "It's not Communism that's bad, it's the human element."

                            Speaking as if any system created by humans will ever be free of the human element, which is of course faulty logic.

                            L This user is from outside of this forum
                            L This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #62

                            , which is of course faulty logic

                            ...which is why design systems so that when using them we can account for the human element, right? Come on! We have centuries-spanning systems even industries built on that! Engineering, avionics, Yelp reviews...

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S [email protected]

                              Yes, but then you can have malicious servers sending fake numbers without other server operators being able to check whether this is at all plausible.

                              (It's still possible for malicious servers to send fake votes, but server operators can see which users they are stated to originate from, then block that server if that looks like it's doing that. At least that is my understanding.)

                              W This user is from outside of this forum
                              W This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #63

                              It's only fake numbers for posts on the instance.

                              Not the first malicious instance, wont be the last.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • K [email protected]

                                I don't know this name, I read its part of the Fediverse... Does this affect us?

                                U This user is from outside of this forum
                                U This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #64

                                Yes, it is probably the oldest or second oldest server suite in the fediverse (diaspora is maybe older).

                                It was an early supporter of statusnet and pump.io, which are the earlier versions of ActivityPub.

                                It originally used it's own protocol to talk to other friendica instances, but a lot of plug-ins came out adding support for everything, even Facebook support for a while.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • rglullis@communick.newsR [email protected]

                                  If the same user downvotes everything I’ve ever said,

                                  Right. How would you know what "the same user" is? Let's say that your posts get downvoted at random intervals by 5-10 users in the first 45-120 minutes. They all have different user names. What are you going to do? Create a report against any particular user and hope that the mods look into it?

                                  queermunist@lemmy.mlQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  queermunist@lemmy.mlQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #65

                                  If everyone's votes are public then it seems trivial to see how any particular user votes.

                                  If user shithead69420 downvotes literally everything I post, they're probably not a good faith user.

                                  rglullis@communick.newsR 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • queermunist@lemmy.mlQ [email protected]

                                    If everyone's votes are public then it seems trivial to see how any particular user votes.

                                    If user shithead69420 downvotes literally everything I post, they're probably not a good faith user.

                                    rglullis@communick.newsR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    rglullis@communick.newsR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #66

                                    Yes, but that's kind of my point?

                                    if downvotes are public, the admin of your instance can see who is downvoting you and then they can take action. If the downvotes are coming from an instance that hides the real user for every vote, you and the admin are SOL.

                                    queermunist@lemmy.mlQ 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • O This user is from outside of this forum
                                      O This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #67

                                      My guess is accidentally hitting the button while scrolling, and too lazy to change it.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • irelephant@lemm.eeI [email protected]

                                        Upvotes seem to just federate as likes and dislikes.

                                        steal_your_face@lemmy.mlS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        steal_your_face@lemmy.mlS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #68

                                        I think lemmy instance admins can see this too. Doesn’t even have to be a friendica instance

                                        C sunshine@lemmy.caS 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • rglullis@communick.newsR [email protected]

                                          Yes, but that's kind of my point?

                                          if downvotes are public, the admin of your instance can see who is downvoting you and then they can take action. If the downvotes are coming from an instance that hides the real user for every vote, you and the admin are SOL.

                                          queermunist@lemmy.mlQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          queermunist@lemmy.mlQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #69

                                          Oh I see, you were talking about a hypothetical where all instances hide their votes and so no one knows who is voting on anything.

                                          My assumption was that these vote records would remain transparent on most instances because the instances that hide their votes just get defederated, because those are always going to be instances where trolls hide.

                                          rglullis@communick.newsR 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups