United States government group chat leak - Wikipedia
-
Hear me out yall. I know the word fggot is universally hated at this point in history and I'm aware that rednecks use it to degrade gays... but can we PLEASE start calling these people fggot again like we used to in the 90s. They deserve it and these old dudes know what it really means, it would kill them. They'd hate it so much esp because they aren't gay and they hate that shit. I never a day in my life would dream of calling a gay person that for the record, but these fools, they are the true f*ggots.
What in the honest fuck are you trying to say? Call these dudes slurs?
-
How would that help exactly?
y'know the way the f-slur is kinda-reclaimed? Lets make it a worse slur again!
-
the devil works fast, but wikipedia writers work faster.
American Conservatives in 2015: "Wikileaks is the greatest threat to domestic security! They'll destroy our reputation at home and threat the safety of our brave men and women fighting abroad!"
American Conservatives in 2025: "Actually, it is incredibly cool to post Collateral Murder videos to the public group chat."
-
How would that help exactly?
-
Reclamation is generally performed by the targeted group. You must to seek approval from the gay council to pursue this
But they don't call each other it. It's not like they even use it, we could change the meaning. Blacks should have pulled the uno reverse and started calling ex slave owners and confederates the N word. You can't tell me that shit wouldn't have been super effective. It would be like us calling white Christian natíonalists the f word. Take their power away. Love it or hate it, you know I'm right.
-
the devil works fast, but wikipedia writers work faster.
53 people were killed.
None of the right ones though.
-
But they don't call each other it. It's not like they even use it, we could change the meaning. Blacks should have pulled the uno reverse and started calling ex slave owners and confederates the N word. You can't tell me that shit wouldn't have been super effective. It would be like us calling white Christian natíonalists the f word. Take their power away. Love it or hate it, you know I'm right.
I don't think that's how reclaiming a word works.
-
But they don't call each other it. It's not like they even use it, we could change the meaning. Blacks should have pulled the uno reverse and started calling ex slave owners and confederates the N word. You can't tell me that shit wouldn't have been super effective. It would be like us calling white Christian natíonalists the f word. Take their power away. Love it or hate it, you know I'm right.
Enough.
Every single person in the group chat, minus the guy from the Atlantic, has done heinous degenerate treasonous shit and deserves to be called out for it. Use truth. Stop with the slurs.
Signed,
Your Resident Mod -
Enough.
Every single person in the group chat, minus the guy from the Atlantic, has done heinous degenerate treasonous shit and deserves to be called out for it. Use truth. Stop with the slurs.
Signed,
Your Resident Mod -
the devil works fast, but wikipedia writers work faster.
If this were pitched as an SNL skit it would have been thrown out of the writers room for being too unbelievable.
-
the devil works fast, but wikipedia writers work faster.
How is it possible that it took less than a day to add this, but when I add articles it takes months?
-
the devil works fast, but wikipedia writers work faster.
What a pathetic, limped dicked circlejerk. "Look Europe, we're destabilizing the Middle East so that we can bring down oil prices for us, why aren't you guys gargling our cum?". Fuck those morons and fuck whoever voted for them.
-
(We’re destroying America with our bare hands. The fires are incidental)
Not: Fist-bump about the burning flag?
-
Not: Fist-bump about the burning flag?
fisting the flag’s ring of fire
-
How is it possible that it took less than a day to add this, but when I add articles it takes months?
Notability?
-
Its highly topical, so it could have been prioritised.
-
53 people were killed.
None of the right ones though.
Did you mean:
-
the devil works fast, but wikipedia writers work faster.
Do we have evidence that it truly was these officials behind the phone numbers in this group? Their opinions in the screenshots seem to alogn with their opinions IRL, but it just hit me that it would be relatively easy for someone to create a group with these names+profice pictures and 'accidentally' add in the journalist to decoy them.
-
the devil works fast, but wikipedia writers work faster.
The question is: Can the US government actually do something about this? The journalist had been invited, and probably no-one had reiterated to the group that the contents are top secret.
