PeerTube crowdfunding to develop mobile app
-
Isn't there already a mobile app?
Developers can focus on whatever they seem appropriate.
But I think content discover and community (lack of) are the biggest issues of peertube right now.
I hop once in a while to the main peertube site and I can never find anything remotely interesting to watch. There may be some good content, but it's impossible to find.
I'd really like to get into the app but its been hard to navigate. Do you have any recommendations for good channels?
-
I wouldn't want to associate with an app that's ripping off YouTube when you're an app trying to make a better YouTube.
But also, this is open source. Who are you to say that funding an effort should go to one place and not another? I think the people who actually put effort into Peertube are best place to determine what's good for the project.
its video sharing, its not a crazy concept, like dailymotion and vimeo have existed forever, idk if they still do lol, think social media platforms adding vidoe like facebook killed those as popular alternatives but Im prob wrong
-
I'd really like to get into the app but its been hard to navigate. Do you have any recommendations for good channels?
What are your interests?
Anyway you could try following this community: https://lemmy.world/c/peertube
-
This post did not contain any content.
Why not a PWA?
-
Why not a PWA?
Don't want to log in again and again every time I clear my browser's cookies!
-
Why not a PWA?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Well even a PWA still has to be developed and maintained.
-
Why not a PWA?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Because PWAs are terrible unfortunately.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I like that they are finally raising some money to do development. This is really good to see.
-
What are your interests?
Anyway you could try following this community: https://lemmy.world/c/peertube
-
Because PWAs are terrible unfortunately.
Pwas aren't terrible. Chrome made pwas terrible.
-
Pwas aren't terrible. Chrome made pwas terrible.
I’m well aware of why they’re terrible, (Safari as well). However the unfortunate result is that they are terrible.
-
Don't want to log in again and again every time I clear my browser's cookies!
That’s…literally the point of clearing cookies? Do you also complain that swimming makes you wet?
-
That’s…literally the point of clearing cookies? Do you also complain that swimming makes you wet?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]I clear cookies in my browser on exit. Because I want to clear most cookies.
I have dedicated apps for services where I don't want to log in every time, even when they have a web version, because of the above.
I know this can be done with firefox settings (at least on desktop) but thats a hassle.
-
This post did not contain any content.
GrayJay has a peertube plugin which works well.
-
Don't want to log in again and again every time I clear my browser's cookies!
Valid. Except on some browsers e.g. Vivaldi you can put sites on a list that retain their cookies even when you clear the rest.
-
GrayJay has a peertube plugin which works well.
but grayjay is only for media consumption. you cannot stream nor upload videos from it
-
Because PWAs are terrible unfortunately.
They don't have to be, as far as I understand it. I've installed a few websites as apps on my phone (because their app had trackers in it) and they can work really well. Examples are Bluesky and Flipboard.
An example where I agree with you is LinkedIn - installed as a web app due to trackers - but they know this, and the whole point of their app is to get you with Facebook and Microsoft trackers, so they make the web app experience miserable on purpose.
But (and correct me if I'm wrong) a PWA made by a non-surveillance capitalist could be just as good as a native app.
-
They don't have to be, as far as I understand it. I've installed a few websites as apps on my phone (because their app had trackers in it) and they can work really well. Examples are Bluesky and Flipboard.
An example where I agree with you is LinkedIn - installed as a web app due to trackers - but they know this, and the whole point of their app is to get you with Facebook and Microsoft trackers, so they make the web app experience miserable on purpose.
But (and correct me if I'm wrong) a PWA made by a non-surveillance capitalist could be just as good as a native app.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Half of the equation is that those making the PWA need to make it well. The other half is that the platform you install it on has to support it well. And Google and Apple have decided to support PWAs as little as possible (in some cases removing support for them altogether. See Apple removing the ability to use them entirely in the EU). And since those two companies make the two most commonly used mobile OS’… well it’s better to just go with a native app.
The #1 biggest problem with PWAs on iOS for example is the lack of push notification support, which for a lot of apps is a nonstarter. Is that the PWA makers fault? No. Does it make that PWA suck anyway? Yes.
-
but grayjay is only for media consumption. you cannot stream nor upload videos from it
You're right, I didn't even think of that
-
Because PWAs are terrible unfortunately.
There are tons of apps that you use that are just well packaged PWAs, packaged as an app store app, and you don't even know about it.
PWAs only suck on when they suck, just like everything else.
