I'm gonna mute this one
-
This post did not contain any content.
Anybody who uses "literally" to mean anything but "literally":
a) needs to be caned,
b) literally has no valuable opinions. -
I live in a country where if you don’t have a job the government will pay for your rent and utilities, indefinitely.
Well, good for you. I live in a country that doesn't. I live in a country where your perspective is classist and callous.
You forgot racist. Everything you don't like is racist.
Keep raging at the people trying to solve the problem while you do nothing.
-
Anybody who uses "literally" to mean anything but "literally":
a) needs to be caned,
b) literally has no valuable opinions. -
You forgot racist. Everything you don't like is racist.
Keep raging at the people trying to solve the problem while you do nothing.
You forgot racist. Everything you don’t like is racist.
I did not. Though now I suspect you hear it a lot.
Keep raging at the people trying to solve the problem while you do nothing.
hostile architecture is not a solution.
-
Anybody who uses "literally" to mean anything but "literally":
a) needs to be caned,
b) literally has no valuable opinions.As someone who studies the english language, No
️ -
This post did not contain any content.
Oh, I didn't realize it was kids hour for neolibs to comment on lemmy.
Well, get your ignorance out now kids, it is gonna hurt less than if you deny it wayyyyy into your adulthood....
sigh
falls asleep on bench
-
As someone who studies the english language, No
️Wow so you have no heart? Figures, person who can't use english the way I have arbitrarily decided it should be used based on other the word farts of people who are suffocatingly similar in lack of imagination to me.
-
Who is Merriam-Webster? Some woke billionaire?
-
You forgot racist. Everything you don’t like is racist.
I did not. Though now I suspect you hear it a lot.
Keep raging at the people trying to solve the problem while you do nothing.
hostile architecture is not a solution.
No, shelters are.
-
No, shelters are.
So hostile architecture is unnecessary.
-
You’re stupid if you think this is the effect anti-homeless architecture is having in the places it’s being implemented. They have very little impact to begin with. I don’t pretend to think that shelters can’t be improved, but if people refuse to utilize the resources we have, we must either come up with new resources or reevaluate our investments in the resources we currently employ.
It's a political problem. Houseless people are there because there's no political willpower to create systematic change to support them. So you're absolutely right when you say:
we must either come up with new resources or reevaluate our investments in the resources we currently employ.
The only problem is the answer to this question is more often on the side of the investment not being worth it, so the problem is left unaddressed.
-
I feel you, my point is that the time for fighting for a better democrat candidate is during the primaries (or now), not during an election. Plenty of "leftists" online (and real people like Muslims in Michigan who said it on TV) actively shit talked Harris weeks before the election.
And every time the primaries come, people decide quite decisively that they want the problematic candidate (Clinton, Biden) over the one that would bring change.
And the second topic, why the democrats don't do anything to stop the gop, two things:
-
because they fucking can't, the are in the minority fucking everywhere. Americans had 4 years of trump, the covid debacle, the Capitol assault, the Georgia thing, the criminal convictions, the sexual assaults and the nuclear secrets in the shitter (to name a few), then 4 years of Biden where Israel continued to kill Palestinians as they always have and eggs got expensive and they decided to go back to trump in a landslide. No amount of boring speeches or whatever redditors and lemmings accuse the dems of justify that. The plurality of American voters (almost a majority) are morons with the memory of a goldfish and now they are looking to shift the blame for what they themselves have caused. We voted for trump, but how could we know wlyhat he would do X? (besides him saying "I will do X" repeatedly on TV, X being a part of project 2025 and trump voters wearing t-shirts "X is coming" constantly at rallies). Why arent democrats saving us now, X is all their fault.
-
why isn't the question: "why are the Republicans doing it?" in the first place...
wrote last edited by [email protected]I feel you, my point is that the time for fighting for a better democrat candidate is during the primaries (or now)
And yet even (now) when leftists state even the mildest of criticisms against liberals, we get accused of not being able to differentiate between liberals and fascists. "Both Sides The Same"- right?
And plenty of people do try to get better candidates elected during the primaries. You know who makes that damn near impossible? The fucking DNC. They are the ones who decides who gets the nomination, not the people. In 2016 we finally had proof of that when they colluded with the Clinton campaign against Bernie Sanders, and if you think that was anything new or has changed in any way- you aren't paying as close of attention as you imagine you are. In the ensuing lawsuit the DNC successfully argued in court that the DNC is "well within their rights to select their own candidate". This is despite the fact that their own charter promises ‘impartiality and even handedness’. They argued that was a mere "political promise" (aka an outright lie) and that it was "political rhetoric" that is not enforceable in federal courts.
So I'll ask you, if it's the DNC who decides who the nomination goes to and not the people, does that sound 'Democratic' to you? To me that sounds exactly like the Oligarchs are already in control and have been for a long time. How else are we supposed to fight for a better candidate other than try to educate others?
The vast majority of voters aren't even aware that even went down, because 'surprised Pikachu face' it was barely covered in the 'mainstream media'. The ONLY hope we have is waking people up to the realities of the situation, and liberals constantly blaming leftists for their failings isn't helping that cause at all.
Plenty of “leftists” online actively shit talked Harris weeks before the election.
Ok? Let's say for the sake of argument that all these people you claim to have seen with tons of support here and on reddit were actually leftists. Do you think they were doing that in order to get Trump elected? 'Weeks before the election' pretty much everyone had already made their mind up who they were voting for. The so-called 'moderates' who voted for Trump were not swayed by them.
The sad truth is that the U.S. elections are a clown show and it's more of a popularity contest than about policy. Most Republicans have no idea what Trumps plan/platform actually is other than "get rid of as many brown people as we can", and not an insignificant amount of Democratic supporters liked Harris simply for being a woman of color with a D next to her name. And that is exactly why Harris was less popular than Trump to these supposed 'moderates', because she was a woman and a person of color. I don't know if you have noticed or not, but we kind of have a huge problem with racism and misogyny in the U.S. The few supposed leftists you saw online 'shit talking' her couldn't make her an old white man, no matter how much they sucked on her asshole.
At any rate as I have already pointed out, it's highly likely that Harris did win, but Elon helped his 'good buddy' Trump rig the elections- so it likely wouldn't have mattered if every single non MAGAt in the country voted for the pro-slavery cop anyway.
because they fucking can’t, the are in the minority fucking everywhere.
It's true that they are in the minority, it's not true that they are powerless to do anything about it. There are plenty of things they could do to make life Hell for the Trump administration, but many of them are rolling over like good little puppets. Could it be because the D's and the R's are both basically on the same side and only exist to give us the illusion of choice? Nah, couldn't be that.
The plurality of American voters (almost a majority) are morons with the memory of a goldfish
You'll get almost no argument from me here except for the fact that it's not because they are morons, it's because they are ignorant by design. I would (not) like to see the effect 100 years of anti-left propaganda, "red scares", sabotaging education, crony capitalism, 'corporate personhood', rigged elections, corrupt politicians, media being 100% controlled by billionaires, and foreign interference coupled with an archaic voting system would do to your country but if you think your people would make better decisions in such a scenario- we will have to agree to disagree on that.
Both the DNC and the GOP intentionally keep us at each other throats so that we are so busy fighting each other that we wont notice that the real enemy is them and the billionaires they serve, and they have the not-so insignificant power of the largest propaganda machine in the entire world helping them with that project. Yes, one side is "better", but only just enough better to get around 50% of the vote each election. So weird that works out that way- right?
and now they are looking to shift the blame for what they themselves have caused.
And you are on here helping them to do just that. Do you imagine it's a coincidence that the Liberals are working overtime to blame Leftists for the mess they helped cause? Leftists are the reason that Trump won- right? Leftists are too stupid to tell the difference between the two parties- right? It has nothing at all to do with their candidate being a literal trash human being- right?
why isn’t the question: “why are the Republicans doing it?” in the first place…
That's a fair question, but one with a much simpler answer. If you were a Billionaire/ Group of Billionaires who made their fortune by exploiting people and you had the ability to literally buy the Government in order to insure that will never change- you would be a fool not to. Their job was made easy by having only two political parties to buy. They then set about turning half the country against the other half- again to distract from what they are doing. Then along comes a wild card in the form of Trump. A megalomaniac who used the racism and hatred of "Liberal" ideals and worship of the ruling class that the Republicans had carefully fostered to win massive support among the racist and hateful half of the country. Remember that the establishment Republicans did not want anything to do with Trump when he first started in politics, so much so that the only person he could get to be his VP this time around was formerly a 'never Trumper' (you know he hates that). Once the Republicans saw there was no stopping the hate train, they had little choice but to hop aboard or be crushed by it. et voilà! Fascism comes to "The Land of the Free".
-
-
Either make compromises with other progressives or continue to let conservatives enact their vision of society to our collective detriment. Those are the options.
Except don't make "compromises" like the DNC where they abandon their base to chase after conservative voters that will never, ever, ever vote for them.
-
making the world as hostile as possible is a good thing?
Oh, please, seriously? I advocate for a feature in public spaces that disincentivizes homeless people from sleeping on park benches and you think I’m trying to create a living Hell for them? After I’ve already also advocated for more to be put into affordable housing and outreach services for them? Get over your self-righteousness, man. Demonizing me won’t convince me or anyone else.
And for the record, gaslighting is when you lie and manipulate a person ways that specifically cause them to doubt their perception of reality; it’s not a catch-all term for saying something someone else thinks is untrue.
Perhaps you should read your own comments with that in mind.
-
I have written and rewritten my response here trying to find the right tone. I feel like we are closer to agreement here than might be immediately obvious.
I think a lot of what we are seeing now is a result of 50+ years of people who find the idea of your republic distasteful seeking every method they can to erode it away.
All the details are just components of this project, seems to me that MAGA is a result of years of stoking xenophobia and anti-intellectualism.
Turns out if you spend decades laying the groundwork you can make the situation seem completely hopeless to a whole populace.
I sincerely worry the long term goal is to perfect the formula for dismantling democracy and then start exporting it to the rest of the world.Or I could be a fool, I don't know and I don't want to rewrite this again. Sorry that this was so rambling.
[...] now is a result of 50+ years of people who find the idea of your republic distasteful [...]
You're absolutely right, although the cycle goes back a lot further than 50 years. The two parties are playing good cop / bad cop against the middle, directed by their donors with the concerns of the people driving only the nature of the lies they tell. The right wing implements authority the left placates the masses with flaccid opposition. Don't let your left parties slip to the "middle", it's just another word for right.
-
By your logic, anyone from Australia would say the literal exact opposite. Let’s not forget what Liberal parties around the world are like.
That being said, in the US there are no elected center left candidates except maybe two or three. Elected Democrats—liberals, usually—are just as traitor lunatic as right wingers when it comes to anti homeless designs.
The fact that you talk about “the other extreme” without even a hint of self reflection is troublesome at best. The other “extreme” is called housing, son.
Did an American just question my logic? You guys are kinda deranged and politically toxic
-
Conservatives wouldn't build the bench.
Free public spaces don't encourage people to go in to a shop hard enough. You wanna sit down? Starbucks has chairs. Want a sip of water, go buy a bottle.
Can I just say I used to live in a country with shanty towns and it sucks, it’s a shit show. Why would anyone want that? Slapping tiny homes on city parks isn’t a solution it’s just stupid
-
Can I just say I used to live in a country with shanty towns and it sucks, it’s a shit show. Why would anyone want that? Slapping tiny homes on city parks isn’t a solution it’s just stupid
I was referring to like, parks, and town squares. Town squares are pretty rare in the US
-
Provided, of course, that the leaves are variegated.
Or gentrified or whatever!
-
No. But since you have experience, let me ask you: did you spend time sleeping on public benches and do you think features that attempt to prevent this are an attack on homeless people? And just to be clear, since this is a text-only format, I’m not being sarcastic or trying to make light of your experience; I’m genuinely curious.
wrote last edited by [email protected]When I was homeless all the shelters were full, and housing was a year plus wait for anything. I often slept in a concrete tube under a bridge. Then the government came in, removed the tubes, and puts spikes all over the concrete under the bridge. Yes I felt it was an attack. I was forced to move further out from where I could attain help, and do something to sustain myself, only making it harder for me to exist. Dealing with the government to maintain my place of residence, and medical treatment, is a part time job, where I spend, literally, 4-6 hours on hold with places like Jobs and Family Services, and the local housing authority. I can absolutely understand how easy it would be for me to stay homeless if I were say, schizophrenic. Luckily I am not, and I can maintain things like schedules, keep dozens of appointments per month, etc.
This is one of the worst possible ways to encourage people to seek help. it shows a deep lack of understanding what day-to-day life is for the homeless, especially ones who are very mentally ill.
