[OC] That’s not the reason we need you for
-
Twenty years ago, some savvy engineers created the Rumba. It's a kind of annoying overpriced vacuum cleaner, but you can at least see the edges of a useful appliance.
Ten years ago, everyone was smelling their own farts about the advent of autonomous taxis. And, idk, we can at least pretend we're in the ballpark right now.
Today, it's noticeable how AI feels like a surrender on actual autonomous machines. Like, the idea of doing actual robotics is out the window. We're only going to spend our money on a solved problem - data processing - and see what we can wring out of it.
I do wonder what this will mean in another ten or twenty years.
there is plenty of work going on autonomous front but its solely focused on means to kill the peasants who try to inconvenience the oligarchs. take a look at palmers anduril industries. there are other such companies based in the confederate states.
-
there is plenty of work going on autonomous front but its solely focused on means to kill the peasants who try to inconvenience the oligarchs. take a look at palmers anduril industries. there are other such companies based in the confederate states.
There's a lot of salesmanship going on. But whether it really does anything or it just outsources work to a Mechanical Turk or blows smoke up your ass?
Even Lavender AI seems more like an excuse for conventional manual massacre than a real Skynet for Palestinians.
What does Anduril do that the NSA or the CIA wasn't already doing, except maybe putting a thick coat of bullshit on the conclusion?
-
There's a lot of salesmanship going on. But whether it really does anything or it just outsources work to a Mechanical Turk or blows smoke up your ass?
Even Lavender AI seems more like an excuse for conventional manual massacre than a real Skynet for Palestinians.
What does Anduril do that the NSA or the CIA wasn't already doing, except maybe putting a thick coat of bullshit on the conclusion?
nsa and cia can’t whack large number of americans without some risk of mutiny from the soldiers. ai based large scale precision strike does give them both the capability and excuse to do so. what’s easier, to ask 100k soldiers to kill 2-3 people each and feel no guilt or a dozen narcissistic psychopaths to kill 10k people each and feel godlike ? its not really rocket science just track their cell and do a missile/drone strike at the location with basic face detection. they don’t care for few false-positives. its not like any of the targets will be living near oligarchs palace or mega-yacht
you are right the lavender is far from skynet but it lets the israeli scums say that they are not indiscriminately killing innocents but based on petabytes of data analysed by microsoft. and you can’t punish ai for mistakes. bombing kids collecting water or destroying a dialysis center, oopsie sorry the ai hallucinated, we will ask trump for a multi-billion refund to buy more bombs for proper testing.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Cooking can be an art too!
-
Twenty years ago, some savvy engineers created the Rumba. It's a kind of annoying overpriced vacuum cleaner, but you can at least see the edges of a useful appliance.
Ten years ago, everyone was smelling their own farts about the advent of autonomous taxis. And, idk, we can at least pretend we're in the ballpark right now.
Today, it's noticeable how AI feels like a surrender on actual autonomous machines. Like, the idea of doing actual robotics is out the window. We're only going to spend our money on a solved problem - data processing - and see what we can wring out of it.
I do wonder what this will mean in another ten or twenty years.
So this is scary. We already know that POTUS has no quams about using ai to make shit fake videos. I would be surprised if his plan for indefinite term is actually chat gpt plan.
Ps. Chat gpt DOES actively try to manipulate you.
-
Cooking can be an art too!
It's much easier to treat it as an art if you do it because you want to, not because you have to.
Like most things in life, really.
-
It's much easier to treat it as an art if you do it because you want to, not because you have to.
Like most things in life, really.
Well said
-
So this is scary. We already know that POTUS has no quams about using ai to make shit fake videos. I would be surprised if his plan for indefinite term is actually chat gpt plan.
Ps. Chat gpt DOES actively try to manipulate you.
Ps. Chat gpt DOES actively try to manipulate you.
No, it doesn't "try" to do anything. Don't antropomorphise it.
-
So this is scary. We already know that POTUS has no quams about using ai to make shit fake videos. I would be surprised if his plan for indefinite term is actually chat gpt plan.
Ps. Chat gpt DOES actively try to manipulate you.
Ps. Chat gpt DOES actively try to manipulate you.
I think mostly it just tells you what it thinks you want to hear. If you push it hard enough to tell you something, it will tell you that. Grok, OTOH, is explicitly trained to try to give you biased answers.
-
nsa and cia can’t whack large number of americans without some risk of mutiny from the soldiers. ai based large scale precision strike does give them both the capability and excuse to do so. what’s easier, to ask 100k soldiers to kill 2-3 people each and feel no guilt or a dozen narcissistic psychopaths to kill 10k people each and feel godlike ? its not really rocket science just track their cell and do a missile/drone strike at the location with basic face detection. they don’t care for few false-positives. its not like any of the targets will be living near oligarchs palace or mega-yacht
you are right the lavender is far from skynet but it lets the israeli scums say that they are not indiscriminately killing innocents but based on petabytes of data analysed by microsoft. and you can’t punish ai for mistakes. bombing kids collecting water or destroying a dialysis center, oopsie sorry the ai hallucinated, we will ask trump for a multi-billion refund to buy more bombs for proper testing.
nsa and cia can’t whack large number of americans without some risk of mutiny from the soldiers
I haven't seen any evidence of that. If anything, the number of ex-military in the new ICE would suggest the opposite.
it lets the israeli scums say that they are not indiscriminately killing innocents but based on petabytes of data analysed by microsoft
Sure. Drop a bomb, kill a dozen people, get a little print out that says "all of these people were terrorists".
It works well in Israel largely because the public (and particularly the military) are juiced on hate. They've already done 90% of the work of indoctrination up front.
You don't even talk about hallucinations. You just say "data indicated terrorists" and move on.
But it's trivial to tell a computer to tag a picture of a person as <img person="terrorist">. That's not something Palmer Luckey needs a multi billion dollar payday to accomplish. Just like with Elon, a bunch of this tech is smoke and mirrors. It's six guys dragging a CyberTaxi on stage, so a few dorks can step out and say "The Future is Magic Cars!"
-
Cooking can be an art too!
Exactly, I'm not a bad cook, I'm a starving artist!
-
Cooking can be an art too!
wrote last edited by [email protected]Honestly, everything that machines can do, there are some people who love doing it, and there can be an art to it. And for each such thing, other humans hate doing it and prefer automation.
Some people love cleaning, but we have robot vacuums and mops.
Some people love cooking and baking, but we have packaged food that requires minimal or no preparation.
Some people love woodworking or glassblowing, but most of our furniture and household items are mass produced.
Some people love managing their own computer or phone, but most people prefer to just let the manufacturer and operating system do it for them.
Some people love growing food with manual tools, but most farming these days is done with automatic machines.
Some people love driving, others can't wait for self-driving cars or prefer public transport just so they don't have to drive.
The list goes on. Anything can be an art.
I don't know what my stance is on this. I think automation is necessary for the sheer quantities we need. I also think passionate professionals can nearly always do a better job than a machine, but it's obviously more expensive and can't keep up with demand.
I guess the difference is that drawing and writing only have value as art. If I don't like drawing I almost never have to do it, but if I don't like preparing food I either suck it up and do it anyway hating every moment, or it can be (and, in fact, is) a serious detriment for my health and well-being.
-
Honestly, everything that machines can do, there are some people who love doing it, and there can be an art to it. And for each such thing, other humans hate doing it and prefer automation.
Some people love cleaning, but we have robot vacuums and mops.
Some people love cooking and baking, but we have packaged food that requires minimal or no preparation.
Some people love woodworking or glassblowing, but most of our furniture and household items are mass produced.
Some people love managing their own computer or phone, but most people prefer to just let the manufacturer and operating system do it for them.
Some people love growing food with manual tools, but most farming these days is done with automatic machines.
Some people love driving, others can't wait for self-driving cars or prefer public transport just so they don't have to drive.
The list goes on. Anything can be an art.
I don't know what my stance is on this. I think automation is necessary for the sheer quantities we need. I also think passionate professionals can nearly always do a better job than a machine, but it's obviously more expensive and can't keep up with demand.
I guess the difference is that drawing and writing only have value as art. If I don't like drawing I almost never have to do it, but if I don't like preparing food I either suck it up and do it anyway hating every moment, or it can be (and, in fact, is) a serious detriment for my health and well-being.
Right, personally I don't like cooking and would be fine with automating that (instead of just ordering/heating junk food).
The most important thing is not to replace stuff completely, but give the choice to each and every individual person themselves. Great if it's available, also great if you don't want to use it.
And if you use it, don't be a dick and claim it was you who did it.
-
This post did not contain any content.
the reason we need you || what we need you for
( choose one ) -
Honestly, everything that machines can do, there are some people who love doing it, and there can be an art to it. And for each such thing, other humans hate doing it and prefer automation.
Some people love cleaning, but we have robot vacuums and mops.
Some people love cooking and baking, but we have packaged food that requires minimal or no preparation.
Some people love woodworking or glassblowing, but most of our furniture and household items are mass produced.
Some people love managing their own computer or phone, but most people prefer to just let the manufacturer and operating system do it for them.
Some people love growing food with manual tools, but most farming these days is done with automatic machines.
Some people love driving, others can't wait for self-driving cars or prefer public transport just so they don't have to drive.
The list goes on. Anything can be an art.
I don't know what my stance is on this. I think automation is necessary for the sheer quantities we need. I also think passionate professionals can nearly always do a better job than a machine, but it's obviously more expensive and can't keep up with demand.
I guess the difference is that drawing and writing only have value as art. If I don't like drawing I almost never have to do it, but if I don't like preparing food I either suck it up and do it anyway hating every moment, or it can be (and, in fact, is) a serious detriment for my health and well-being.
wrote last edited by [email protected]love cleaning
Freaks
robot vacuum
That doesn't really work and spies on you. Still requires human intervention.
cooking
Not if you want it to taste good. You're thinking of restaurants.
some people get off on being pwnd
That's a serious problem on so many levels.
furniture
You think i wouldn't like some good handmade shit that will last firever instead of this ikea crap that will come apart a little every time i move it? But i get told my labor isnt worth that. So the old growth wood gets chopped into tiny pieces for my fückyoü cabinets. Still made by people btw. I will dig up William morris and stroke his century dead disintegrated corpse dick til it soaks you in formaldehyde over this.
food is mostoy automated
Nope. You're just wrong about this. It's a seeious problem with these harsh border regimes; no farm labor. People will go hungry.
only have value as 'art'
No.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Stupid meme, people have already did the artwork they have stole to train their "ai" machines, so basically they say to our face that we can steal and do whatever we want with it but you cannot
-
Ps. Chat gpt DOES actively try to manipulate you.
No, it doesn't "try" to do anything. Don't antropomorphise it.
It's a short hand way of communicating. Like saying that a good search engine tries to find the most relevant sites. Or a streaming algorithm tries to recommend videos that you'll watch. It's not that we are saying these things are conscious or whatever. We're just describing what they do.
-
Twenty years ago, some savvy engineers created the Rumba. It's a kind of annoying overpriced vacuum cleaner, but you can at least see the edges of a useful appliance.
Ten years ago, everyone was smelling their own farts about the advent of autonomous taxis. And, idk, we can at least pretend we're in the ballpark right now.
Today, it's noticeable how AI feels like a surrender on actual autonomous machines. Like, the idea of doing actual robotics is out the window. We're only going to spend our money on a solved problem - data processing - and see what we can wring out of it.
I do wonder what this will mean in another ten or twenty years.
Yeah, that robotics stuff is happening still (e.g. little robot mowers using machine vision for easier guidance).
But you are right that the prospect of advanced robotics gets a fraction of the attention that chatbots get. Trillions of bets on datacenter bound LLMs that can generate images, videos, and text but a relative pittance for advancements that would translate to physical labor..
I get that there's value, but the value proposition seems way out of whack.
-
I don't think we killed them all, but there was certainly a lot less horse sex happening
wrote last edited by [email protected]We killed most of them. Butchered them for parts.
Why tge fuck would we have kept feeding something that didnt make line go up?
-
Cooking can be an art too!
No one is making an art piece every meal.
