Out of 10. Be specific!
-
This post did not contain any content.
Excellent for pokin' olives. 7/10
-
Excellent for pokin' olives. 7/10
I was gonna say eyes
-
Reminds me of an early Bart Simpson
Looks like Barts older cousin
-
I prefer this one. Way more area in the handle for better grip.
That's not a fork that's a thnork
-
That is a rational number
22/7 doesn't count
-
22/7 doesn't count
3.145183813819291837 isn't the beginning of π, it's just some random number that happens to also start with 3.14
-
This post did not contain any content.
Tines are uneven, 4/10
-
This post did not contain any content.
4 out of 5 prongs.
-
This post did not contain any content.
7/10
Would suck for most situations but would excel in a few specific situations
-
If I got it at Goodwill for $.10, 6/10 because obviously that's a manufacturing dud but I'll give it a good home and use it when all the other utensils are dirty.
I wouldn't be surprised to see this pathetic waste in some Michelin star restaurant pretending it's trendy and they wasted hundreds buying 200 for $15 each. In that case -5/10.
Nah the michelin waste should be higher because some rich asshole lost an investment and some chef got a dream job for a while.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Will-stab-my-eye-out-to-never-see-it-again/10
-
Bricks? I've seen a surprising amount about utensils, but I think i missed the bricks.
It was a couple days ago, some greentext post about some anon's brother hates cement and cement blocks.
-
This post did not contain any content.
8/10. -4 for unneeded weight, -3 for asymmetry making prongs short, +5 for actually sharp prongs. Looking at you, every other "fork" out there you.
-
This post did not contain any content.
shove it up your ass/10
