Whats the most weirdly aggressive mod removal reason you've received in your ModLog?
-
It’s called Zalgo text, just search for a Zalgo text generator.
wrote last edited by [email protected]Is it just, like
perpendicular/verticalorthogonal superimposed script -
Is it just, like
perpendicular/verticalorthogonal superimposed scriptI’m uncertain as to the mechanics behind it, but that sounds reasonable
-
Reason: Low-effort garbage
Is that standard boilerplate enumerated removal reason or is that personalized?
I even took time to italicise and bold certain parts of the title
I get that Heil Honey, I'm Home is controversial but its still worthy of inquiry; even if it wasnt, I feel like thats not really a decision mods should be proactively making, thats more curation and it sort of conflicts with the spirit of Lemmy and civil dialectical discussion in general
What a joyk?!
—hitler
I guess I downvoted too much? There were a lot of clickbait titles with zero description. I also upvoted quality posts
️
-
Is it just, like
perpendicular/verticalorthogonal superimposed scriptBasically it abuses the fact that Unicode allows combining of multiple characters in a single character space with offsets and rotations applied. Zalgo text basically takes a ton of random accent characters (E.g the squiggly above Spanish Ñ), which are considered their own marks, and combines them on one letter with lots of offset.
-
Basically it abuses the fact that Unicode allows combining of multiple characters in a single character space with offsets and rotations applied. Zalgo text basically takes a ton of random accent characters (E.g the squiggly above Spanish Ñ), which are considered their own marks, and combines them on one letter with lots of offset.
wrote last edited by [email protected]Is it just diacritical signs?
-
Is it just diacritical signs?
Yup! Unicode doesn't put any limits on them.
-
Yup! Unicode doesn't put any limits on them.
I respect that
-
I mean thats kind of funny in a way (very human) but what was the actual stimulus for that?
Oh man, it's been a while. Without looking up the mod log to confirm, I think i was annoyed the person I was arguing with was bad at it. I probably said something very insulting for no good reason. I can tend to do that every now and again.
-
Oh man, it's been a while. Without looking up the mod log to confirm, I think i was annoyed the person I was arguing with was bad at it. I probably said something very insulting for no good reason. I can tend to do that every now and again.
Honestly, I find civil skepticism is more than enough 97% of the time
-
Reason: Low-effort garbage
Is that standard boilerplate enumerated removal reason or is that personalized?
I even took time to italicise and bold certain parts of the title
I get that Heil Honey, I'm Home is controversial but its still worthy of inquiry; even if it wasnt, I feel like thats not really a decision mods should be proactively making, thats more curation and it sort of conflicts with the spirit of Lemmy and civil dialectical discussion in general
What a joyk?!
—hitler
Only once had my post removed, from [email protected] with the reason "Take a break". Not especially offensive as a message, but also not a real justification since it was the first time I posted in that community.
But the post and screenshot was of a post by the mod of [email protected] saying something idiotic and been widely called on it. But when someone posted it to that community the mod deleted the post. I don't normally get involved in dumb Internet drama (which is why this is the only time I've ever had an interaction with a mod) but the hypocracy of running a community for criticising Internet dumbassery while being completely unwilling to face criticism for your own mistakes was just beyond the pale.
-
Reason: Low-effort garbage
Is that standard boilerplate enumerated removal reason or is that personalized?
I even took time to italicise and bold certain parts of the title
I get that Heil Honey, I'm Home is controversial but its still worthy of inquiry; even if it wasnt, I feel like thats not really a decision mods should be proactively making, thats more curation and it sort of conflicts with the spirit of Lemmy and civil dialectical discussion in general
What a joyk?!
—hitler
I've had one post removed: a photo of a motorcycle helmet, in a public coffee shop, on a ride that I went on with my mother. Reason: nudity.....
-
Reason: Low-effort garbage
Is that standard boilerplate enumerated removal reason or is that personalized?
I even took time to italicise and bold certain parts of the title
I get that Heil Honey, I'm Home is controversial but its still worthy of inquiry; even if it wasnt, I feel like thats not really a decision mods should be proactively making, thats more curation and it sort of conflicts with the spirit of Lemmy and civil dialectical discussion in general
What a joyk?!
—hitler
Does it count as 'weirdly aggressive' that I had a comment removed for an unsourced quotation? Because I was quoting the person I was responding to, directly in the comment I was replying to.
-
Reason: Low-effort garbage
Is that standard boilerplate enumerated removal reason or is that personalized?
I even took time to italicise and bold certain parts of the title
I get that Heil Honey, I'm Home is controversial but its still worthy of inquiry; even if it wasnt, I feel like thats not really a decision mods should be proactively making, thats more curation and it sort of conflicts with the spirit of Lemmy and civil dialectical discussion in general
What a joyk?!
—hitler
wrote last edited by [email protected]a mod of [email protected] did some power tripping shit (don't remember the context) and when I said "the mod of usa authoratism is being authoritarian lol" or something kinda like that I got this gem
iirc the mod got removed from the sub.
edit: found the context
-
Reason: Low-effort garbage
Is that standard boilerplate enumerated removal reason or is that personalized?
I even took time to italicise and bold certain parts of the title
I get that Heil Honey, I'm Home is controversial but its still worthy of inquiry; even if it wasnt, I feel like thats not really a decision mods should be proactively making, thats more curation and it sort of conflicts with the spirit of Lemmy and civil dialectical discussion in general
What a joyk?!
—hitler
I don’t even know how to check that
-
Does it count as 'weirdly aggressive' that I had a comment removed for an unsourced quotation? Because I was quoting the person I was responding to, directly in the comment I was replying to.
I dunno but it generally is good etiquette to more explicitly quote things think
And it helps make context clearer -
a mod of [email protected] did some power tripping shit (don't remember the context) and when I said "the mod of usa authoratism is being authoritarian lol" or something kinda like that I got this gem
iirc the mod got removed from the sub.
edit: found the context
holy shit, this deserves a prize.
what an oblivious douchebag.
-
Reason: Low-effort garbage
Is that standard boilerplate enumerated removal reason or is that personalized?
I even took time to italicise and bold certain parts of the title
I get that Heil Honey, I'm Home is controversial but its still worthy of inquiry; even if it wasnt, I feel like thats not really a decision mods should be proactively making, thats more curation and it sort of conflicts with the spirit of Lemmy and civil dialectical discussion in general
What a joyk?!
—hitler
Got a removal for "rule 4" on one of the UK subs. Looking at the non-numbered rules on the sidebar, I think it correlates with "low effort, spam, or nonsensical post". I'd spent a while writing it and suspect that the mod disagreed with the stance I'd taken on a hot button issue.
-
I don’t even know how to check that
type in your instance URL then add /modlog at the end
-
I guess I downvoted too much? There were a lot of clickbait titles with zero description. I also upvoted quality posts
️
I love the community, I just hate the posts.