if charlie kirk is so pro life then why is he dead?
-
Wherever the shooter is I pray he is safe and well.
There was no shooter. The universe decided to throw a bullet at Charlie Kirk.
-
It looked like a shot right in the jugular. Even if EMT's were sitting right next to him, it's incredibly unlikely to survive that.
More likely the carotid artery since it sprayed.
-
Judging by the weird way his head lolled back I'm pretty sure it severed his spine too. Double whammy. Dude was dead before he knew what hit him.
His arms went into something of a fencing response too. Body only does that when you are fucked in the nervous system. Usually for TBIs though so not sure if that's how it works for spinal dmg.
-
Every time I’ve checked my phone for about a year I’ve been disappointed not to see today’s headline
Here's to many more like it!
-
Genuine question
Because somebody had to wipe that smug retrograde smirk off his face, that's why.
-
I wont lie, I watched the Saddam Hussein video like 2 years after the execution happened.
I'm a true-blue-center-of-the-generation millenial, who grew up on the internet (but avoided places like somethingawful) and I got squeamish over THAT video.
It was legit just a shot of his feet swinging but my brain just went "Thats not fake, not a movie, thats an actual human being", and I got mad uncomfortable.
So, I feel zero percent sadness over CKs death (in fact legit delight! I'm currently out having drinks over it!) But I cannot fathom actually watching the moment a human being's life flickers out.
I aint built for that.
I would say most of us are not built for that. Seeing all this horrible shit the internet offers you can't be good for anyones mental health. In this sense: congratulations on escaping the desensitization.
-
Utah Valley University isn't even a real place.
U tah? You cannot convince me it's not made up
-
I looked around after hearing about it and several sources confirmed his death not long ago.
To steal a quote from that Scottish granny commenting on Thatcher’s death: they ought to put a string of garlic around his neck and a stake in his heart to make sure he doesn’t come back.
Has someone checked on Pitt the Elder to make sure he's still buried?
-
He shall first debate Plato, that'll make him miserable right quick and will go on for a millennium. What is a chair?
Okay. I accept your first assumption. What is a chair. Why do ducks' quacks echo but their farts don't
-
anyone around the age of 40 had plenty of time pre sanitized internet to see almost whatever they wanted
Yeah we could poke shit with a stick down by the creek all day
-
Why do you think political violence is good? Isn't it a sign of a failing state?
One could say that the state was failing pretty hard during the french revolution as well
-
Charlie Kirk’s shooting was an inside job by Trump to take focus off Epstein files!!
See, I said that sarcastically but with the republicans… this is actually quite likely. So who knows. lol.
I’m not say you are 100% correct.
Also, not saying you are 100% wrong.
Somewhere in the middle lay the answer to this conundrum.
Probably the most obvious scenario is going to end up the culprit.
Charlie Kirk is dead.
A brief moment passes,
“Ok sir, now about those Epstein files being released. How are we looking with that? -
Genuine question
He truly was a professional at life.
You see, due to his professialism and resilience, his body produced more blood than an average human. His blood content is comparable to that of Erwin 'Desert Fox' Rommel of WWII brilliant commander fame.
They both had 45-65% more blood than an average human in their bodies at all times.
Once the man uttered the words "gang violence", of incredible importance to himself, that blood rushed into his brain, together with adrenaline and endorphins.
Unfortunately, it was a bit too much for poor Kirk. His blood managed to sever his cartoid. The blood gushed into his head, and the adrenaline compressed his veins.
The rest is history.
Such a pro at life.
-
I’m not say you are 100% correct.
Also, not saying you are 100% wrong.
Somewhere in the middle lay the answer to this conundrum.
Probably the most obvious scenario is going to end up the culprit.
Charlie Kirk is dead.
A brief moment passes,
“Ok sir, now about those Epstein files being released. How are we looking with that?The senate just voted 51-49 to not release them. That's how we're looking with that.
-
Please tell me it's true
Edit: it's fucking true
It's almost too perfect. He was trying to turn a genuine question on gun violence into racist rhetoric, and then got immediately snapped...
Was probably feeling pretty smug with how he spun that until his neck popped.
-
One could say that the state was failing pretty hard during the french revolution as well
Definitely but the US current situation and struggle is not at all like French Revolution. "The aristocrats"(aka the rich) are the ones who lead this, any change won't be for the good of the people, just money changing hands. Looks more like the fall of Roman Republic to me with common people suffering and the state becoming more authoritarian.
-
Genuine question
Because he was shot. Its very simple America, too many guns
-
Genuine question
Well who does Kirk's wife ask now for not getting satisfied? He's dead.
-
His lungs were definitely not full of blood.
-
Genuine question
