Why is there only one invidious instance left?
-
Did the others all decide to quit or is there a practical reason?
You can dig deep for instances not on the list but this isn't recommended
-
Google started blocking them in some way. Even my self-hosted, entirely local-access only instance stopped working.
It got so bad that couldn’t access YouTube on their official app in my company phone without logging in.
-
Did the others all decide to quit or is there a practical reason?
Because Google are dicks.
-
Did you run the token generator thing? Worked for me a couple days ago (but not over a VPN).
That works for me, for a while. I also auto-restart the invidious container stack hourly, per their recommendation. But sooner or later it fails, and usually the fix is to recreate a token. It only takes a minute, but it's a hassle to do often.
-
I haven't, no.
Shit for privacy, but that should fix it
-
Because Google are dicks.
Google rate limits IPs which breaks YouTube for many users who use shared IPs to protect themselves, including invidious users
-
Did the others all decide to quit or is there a practical reason?
Dont post pictures of text without transcribing it
-
YouTube has been cracking down on alternative frontends.
Vanilla Invidious currently doesn't work well,
so most hosters paused and/or gave up.Fijxu runs a fork of Invidious,
with their own modifications implemented to circumvent the blocks, here's the source code if you're interested:
https://git.nadeko.net/Fijxu/invidiousI've got big respect for Fijxu,
he's been doing a very good job of keeping Invidious alive + fighting against the YouTube crackdown lately, basically all on his own.If you can please consider:
- Donating for their work/hosting
- Hosting their fork on your own
- Solving open issues with pull requests to their fork
All the above can help Fijxu,
since currently he's mostly fighting a big tech giant all on his own.thats great ressources thank you!
-
Is it a cool game? Can you host your own?
yes you can
-
Google started blocking them in some way. Even my self-hosted, entirely local-access only instance stopped working.
Even YT on browser for both my tablet and laptop have gotten mad at me and thrown a hissy for forcing me to login. Less of a problem on my Laptop, because I use Freetube to watch on there, and on my Phone I use Revanced. But man, I just hate watching on my Kindle now, because that shit is old and can barely run Firefox (got it via aurora store, not even in the Amazon appstore
) and YT on browser is ass. I tried NewPipe and it crashed all the time, so I got the for PipePipe cause I'm a weeabo, and it worked well but now I get the blocked IP every other day. My tablet crashed when I tried to download Revanced YT on there, so I gave up. -
Did the others all decide to quit or is there a practical reason?
Apart of Invidious, also FreeTube, which works with Invidious, don't work well anymore, it listed the searched Videos, but they are not playable. As workarround I set the SMplayer as extern player, so I can watch the Videos, clicking on the little icon down left of the Video Thumbnail, or open the Video direct in the "Open URL" of the SMplayer. This still works fine, also with the URLs from a lot of other streaming sites. SMplayer is the Graphic interface of the Mplayer.
Anyway, Google is killing all front-ends which cut of the Video ads. I think, there is a need to search an alternative to YT (maybe Odysee?) -
Did the others all decide to quit or is there a practical reason?
Best thing you can do is host it yourself, and keep it private. Doing this has helped with preventing with IPs getting blocked.
-
It got so bad that couldn’t access YouTube on their official app in my company phone without logging in.
Stop using company phones for personal use. Wtf are you thinking
-
Stop using company phones for personal use. Wtf are you thinking
Make me.
-
Make me.
I mean I'm just trying to help.
Just so you know, this attitude is signing the "I acknowledge I'm stepping in shit and have no right to complain when shit gets on me later" line.
I'm not trying to side with your boss here, this advice is for your own good.
-
I mean I'm just trying to help.
Just so you know, this attitude is signing the "I acknowledge I'm stepping in shit and have no right to complain when shit gets on me later" line.
I'm not trying to side with your boss here, this advice is for your own good.
Dude. I don’t care about what you think.
-
YouTube has been cracking down on alternative frontends.
Vanilla Invidious currently doesn't work well,
so most hosters paused and/or gave up.Fijxu runs a fork of Invidious,
with their own modifications implemented to circumvent the blocks, here's the source code if you're interested:
https://git.nadeko.net/Fijxu/invidiousI've got big respect for Fijxu,
he's been doing a very good job of keeping Invidious alive + fighting against the YouTube crackdown lately, basically all on his own.If you can please consider:
- Donating for their work/hosting
- Hosting their fork on your own
- Solving open issues with pull requests to their fork
All the above can help Fijxu,
since currently he's mostly fighting a big tech giant all on his own.I think the best thing to do is selfhosting your own instance
piped is doing a great job with their script to install with docker ! Yes I know this takes away the privacy feature allowing google to get your public IP and other annoying metadata... However all the rest works as expected !It has some quirks right now though... But they are very close in solving the issue (already done with LibreTube ).
-
Best thing you can do is host it yourself, and keep it private. Doing this has helped with preventing with IPs getting blocked.
That's what I did. Used a random sbc I had laying around, put on invidious with docker and run. Works. Age restricted videos are an issue though.
-
I think the best thing to do is selfhosting your own instance
piped is doing a great job with their script to install with docker ! Yes I know this takes away the privacy feature allowing google to get your public IP and other annoying metadata... However all the rest works as expected !It has some quirks right now though... But they are very close in solving the issue (already done with LibreTube ).
If it takes away the privacy, why do it at all?
-
If it takes away the privacy, why do it at all?
its just the ip, you can use a vpn
