Bill proposed to outlaw downloading Chinese AI models.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The Netherlands would be high on my list, too. What a pleasant place.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It can if you kind of squeeze the tube a little bit and then let it suck the paste back in. But it's really tedious.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The benefit of being an early adopter is my folder full of Donald Trump suckin' and fuckin' before all of the fun models got taken down from easy access.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
NJB's praise of their infrastructure would have me sold on them if I could actually flee the US.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
uh... no.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
NJB
Neil jeGrasse Byson?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Not Just Bikes.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That's why I consider that tagline, 'The Land of the Free,' the failed punchline of a bad joke now.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Criminalizing something broadly isn’t usually done with the intention of going after everyone who does it, it’s so when they do single out someone they can charge them even if they haven’t actually caught them doing anything wrong (besides the thing everybody does).
See also: the way laws about taxes and drugs are often enforced.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I don't consider it valid so long as conscription exists, but now it's an utter joke
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
People there have chosen that by voting republican. I mean, he told what he planned to do and got voted for anyway..
Freedom, but only for rich, white douchebags
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
From a Sony legal perspective, yes.
When Big Brother decides to force ISPs to tamp it down, they'll do stuff like set limits on unidentifiable traffic, set caps just above reasonable streaming levels.
When there's no freedom of speech, no right to be innocent, you can tell who's torrenting, especially if you don't have to be 100% right to kick them off your network.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That doesn't sound like a free market to me.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
How about forming end to end encrypted wireless ad hoc networks?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Meshes are powerful. They're great at the community level, but scale is an issue.
With the low price of very large thumb drives these days, sneakernet would work.
It would be interesting to see something DHT like IPFS overhauled to work on intermittent mesh networks.
Maybe something in between IPFS and SoulSeek. You keep a list of what you want, when someone comes on line with it you get it, or perhaps we all set aside a couple hundred gigs to fulfill requests.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
They're american, they'd just pick one rich guy to 'own' all Foss projects and make it freenium within a year
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Good luck with that too, especially as GPL3 has a clause specifically forbidding tivoization built into it.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Til a judge 'interprets' that as being specifically about a company named TiVo or invalidates it in the supreme court.
Yk back in my day it was even unthinkable to have a president decide your gender for you, the precedent already being created is insane.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The series of tubes is actually a better analogy than what this Bill imagines the internet to be.