Is it me or Ubuntu secretly replaces DEB Firefox with Snap Firefox?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The installer, last time I tried it, was glitchy and unintuitive.
I used it a few months ago and it was pretty smooth.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That is not the same thing as "snap and apt Firefox are the same". They just hijacked apt to force snap in.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
So both commands do the same thing... right? I'm not saying snap and apt are the same.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I'm a relative Linux noob and Manjaro Arch works perfectly for me, no babysitting required.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You are missing the attribution. The person you are replying to is making a home that canonical says they are the same, not that they are actually the same.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You are missing the attribution. The person you are replying to is making a joke that Canonical says they are the same, not that they are actually the same.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Well, yes, except Canonical have made them actually do the same thing in the case of Firefox. I'm not aware of any other packages that have the deb install just run the snap install.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yeah it's not really a secret
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I used it decades ago (using the CLI installer for a Sid install I eventually fucked up beyond repair) and it was okay for a slightly tech savvy teenager, even then.
I suspect a lot of these issues are down to hardware compatibility more than anything else.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yeah, there's an entire page bitching about it on Linux Mint's website.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yeah for sure, I read your comment as excusing canonical screwing with user intent but I see that's not what you meant.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Red Hat and Ubuntu.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Chromium too iirc
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It was a collaboration, although I'm having trouble finding a source for who wanted it first.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
This is why i switched to Debian. It's 99% of Ubuntu, without the crap.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yup,
apt install chromium-browser
callssnap install chromium
. Looks like thunderbird is the same. There's a fwupd-snap deb but fwupd seems to be the default. -
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Clearly they’re cosplaying as a Canonical engineer whose internal explanation and pleas for them to not take this approach fell upon deaf ears /j
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I.... I.... I don't know why I haven't done that myself. (Am now on NixOS btw) but for work maybe I ask for Debian cloud box.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
w3m
is a proper debLooks like only firefox, chromium-browser and thunderbird are these dummy transitional packages. There's a
fwupd-snap
, but the defaultfwupd
is a full deb. -
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Canonical added an epoch prefix to the firefox version number. Because that epoch (1) is higher than the implicit default (0), the official ubuntu dummy package is always considered to be a higher version than the official Mozilla package. apt doesn't look at snap packages, it installs the deb, but the ubuntu deb just runs
snap install firefox
and basically nothing else.