Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. Google is on the Wrong Side of History.

Google is on the Wrong Side of History.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
technology
57 Posts 39 Posters 107 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C [email protected]
    This post did not contain any content.
    D This user is from outside of this forum
    D This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    We knew this as soon as they got rid of the “Don’t be evil” slogan

    merde@sh.itjust.worksM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C [email protected]
      This post did not contain any content.
      venusaur@lemmy.worldV This user is from outside of this forum
      venusaur@lemmy.worldV This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      Ever heard of JP Morgan or GE? Doesn’t matter.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • snotflickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zoneS [email protected]

        Literally every publicly owned corporation is.

        As this shit gets normalized, watch all of them fall in line.

        Apple is already back advertising on X.

        Corporations only care about money, and they will change their values to match what makes money.

        They never accepted women, blacks, latinos and the disabled into their ranks because they thought those people were humans who had intrinsic value just for existing.

        No, they accepted them because they knew they were leaving money on the table. They could market shaving to women to increase razor blade sales, because now women employees would have money to spend. They could market hair care products to the black community because now their black employees would have money to spend.

        It was always about expanding markets and finding more people to sell shit to. Once that stops being profitable in the USA, treating those people like humans will stop. Watch it happen with the disabled first.

        C This user is from outside of this forum
        C This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        Capitalism is amoral

        snotflickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zoneS Z 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • C [email protected]

          Capitalism is amoral

          snotflickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
          snotflickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          No ethical consumption under capitalism, yep.

          Z 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C [email protected]
            This post did not contain any content.
            matavatnik@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
            matavatnik@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            When have they not?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • snotflickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zoneS [email protected]

              Literally every publicly owned corporation is.

              As this shit gets normalized, watch all of them fall in line.

              Apple is already back advertising on X.

              Corporations only care about money, and they will change their values to match what makes money.

              They never accepted women, blacks, latinos and the disabled into their ranks because they thought those people were humans who had intrinsic value just for existing.

              No, they accepted them because they knew they were leaving money on the table. They could market shaving to women to increase razor blade sales, because now women employees would have money to spend. They could market hair care products to the black community because now their black employees would have money to spend.

              It was always about expanding markets and finding more people to sell shit to. Once that stops being profitable in the USA, treating those people like humans will stop. Watch it happen with the disabled first.

              ulrich@feddit.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
              ulrich@feddit.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              They could market shaving to women to increase razor blade sales, because now women employees would have money to spend.

              That makes zero sense. Paying people so they can spend a tiny fraction of it back to your company? Why not just keep the money in the first place?

              No, they hire them because they've run the math and realized it costs less to hire them than that it costs them in sales due to public perception.

              M M 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • C [email protected]

                That's why I just upgraded my subscription to Proton. (YES I KNOW ABOUT ALL THE DRAMA WITH THEIR CEO!!! AT LEAST THEY'RE NOT SELLING AI SERVICES TO MILITARY CONTRACTORS, DOING MASS SURVEILLANCE OR SELLING MY FUCKING DATA!)

                ulrich@feddit.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
                ulrich@feddit.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                GO BACK TO SENDING PIECES OF PAPER IN THE MAILBOX YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT /s

                C W 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • ulrich@feddit.orgU [email protected]

                  They could market shaving to women to increase razor blade sales, because now women employees would have money to spend.

                  That makes zero sense. Paying people so they can spend a tiny fraction of it back to your company? Why not just keep the money in the first place?

                  No, they hire them because they've run the math and realized it costs less to hire them than that it costs them in sales due to public perception.

                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  You might need to pause and think a bit more. Corporations are competing for money. There isn’t just one big pile of money somewhere.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C [email protected]
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    Inevitably, all hierarchical organizations end up on the wrong side of history.

                    In hierarchies, people compete for position.

                    People with principles, morals, integrity and/or empathy will have choices that they simply will not make.

                    People without those things are not constrained. They can and will make whatever choices might benefit them, with no regard for the consequences to others.

                    So all other things being more or less equal, psychopaths actually have a competitive advantage in hierarchies, and hierarchies end up effectively rewarding and thus selecting for psychopathy.

                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D [email protected]

                      We knew this as soon as they got rid of the “Don’t be evil” slogan

                      merde@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
                      merde@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      ☞ We knew this as soon as they got the “Don’t be evil” slogan

                      if you need to remind yourself not to be evil, that's already a bad start.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • W [email protected]

                        Inevitably, all hierarchical organizations end up on the wrong side of history.

                        In hierarchies, people compete for position.

                        People with principles, morals, integrity and/or empathy will have choices that they simply will not make.

                        People without those things are not constrained. They can and will make whatever choices might benefit them, with no regard for the consequences to others.

                        So all other things being more or less equal, psychopaths actually have a competitive advantage in hierarchies, and hierarchies end up effectively rewarding and thus selecting for psychopathy.

                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        And if there is one uniting principle in conservatism, the singular reason why religious dirt-poor common-clay-of-the-West support billionaires, is that they all deeply believe in hierarchies.

                        Why do they go after trans-women but not trans-men? Because men are naturally higher in the hierarchy than women, thus wanting to exist in male spaces (but not actually crossing into them) is seen as the proper order, whereas wanting to exist in female spaces (read: lowering yourself in the hierarchy) is seen as unnatural.

                        Why do they fellate the rich? Because the wealthy are better people, which is tautologically why they're rich.

                        Why are they racist? Because white people are better than not-white people, natch.

                        Why do they hate atheists? Because the very concept of religion implicitly enforces hierarchy. Sectarian disputes are just an offshoot of this.

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C [email protected]
                          This post did not contain any content.
                          T This user is from outside of this forum
                          T This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          Fuck them

                          O 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • H [email protected]

                            Corporations just reflect the values of their owners. There are companies that emphasize things other than revenue, but as soon as a company goes public and becomes controlled by Wall Street, profit becomes their sole motivation

                            W This user is from outside of this forum
                            W This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            This is why the stock market was, fundamentally, a trojan horse. It was created so capitalism could intertwine the peoples wealth and retirement funds to the success of the wealth of the oligarchy, making the entire market too big to fail.

                            Now the entire system is designed to prevent damage to companies, no matter how moral, unethical, or criminal. The success of corporations IS treated as equal to "national security".

                            S 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B This user is from outside of this forum
                              B This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              This seems relevant here…

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C [email protected]
                                This post did not contain any content.
                                E This user is from outside of this forum
                                E This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                It's a capitalist corporation that sold its soul to the highest bidder. Of course it's evil. It's based on greed and exploitation.

                                I 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ulrich@feddit.orgU [email protected]

                                  GO BACK TO SENDING PIECES OF PAPER IN THE MAILBOX YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT /s

                                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  I ALREADY DO GOD DAMMIT! (Seriously I have pen pals. I write letters every year. I'm actually late and need to write them!)

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B [email protected]

                                    And if there is one uniting principle in conservatism, the singular reason why religious dirt-poor common-clay-of-the-West support billionaires, is that they all deeply believe in hierarchies.

                                    Why do they go after trans-women but not trans-men? Because men are naturally higher in the hierarchy than women, thus wanting to exist in male spaces (but not actually crossing into them) is seen as the proper order, whereas wanting to exist in female spaces (read: lowering yourself in the hierarchy) is seen as unnatural.

                                    Why do they fellate the rich? Because the wealthy are better people, which is tautologically why they're rich.

                                    Why are they racist? Because white people are better than not-white people, natch.

                                    Why do they hate atheists? Because the very concept of religion implicitly enforces hierarchy. Sectarian disputes are just an offshoot of this.

                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    Progressives are much the same way, but with different hierarchies. Progressives seem to love big government hierarchies which a strong executive branch enforcing a bunch of regulations.

                                    That's what you get from a two party system, you get two groups with a fetish for different types of hierarchies.

                                    Reject hierarchy and push for local rule, it's what we in the box like to call liberty.

                                    B N 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C [email protected]

                                      I ALREADY DO GOD DAMMIT! (Seriously I have pen pals. I write letters every year. I'm actually late and need to write them!)

                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      Get on it.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C [email protected]

                                        That's why I just upgraded my subscription to Proton. (YES I KNOW ABOUT ALL THE DRAMA WITH THEIR CEO!!! AT LEAST THEY'RE NOT SELLING AI SERVICES TO MILITARY CONTRACTORS, DOING MASS SURVEILLANCE OR SELLING MY FUCKING DATA!)

                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        I switched to Tuta for email and calendar and other services for other products. I try to avoid putting too many eggs in a given basket.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C [email protected]

                                          Capitalism is amoral

                                          Z This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Z This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          Unfortunately alternatives aren't any better...

                                          D S P 3 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups