Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Lemmy Shitpost
  3. Lemmy be like

Lemmy be like

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Lemmy Shitpost
419 Posts 150 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S [email protected]

    This echo chamber isn't ready for this logical discussion yet unfortunately lol

    C This user is from outside of this forum
    C This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #215

    When someone disagrees with me - echo chamber.

    When someone agrees with me - logical discussion.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    9
    • S [email protected]

      This is valid to all data centers serving all websites. Your take is a criticism of unregulated capitalism, not AI.

      Beef farming is a far far far more impactful discussion, yet here we are.

      C This user is from outside of this forum
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #216

      Ai takes far more power to serve a single request than a website does though.

      And remember, AI requires those websites too, for training data.

      So it's not just more power hungry, it also has thw initial power consumption added on top

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      7
      • R [email protected]

        A hammer doesn't consume exorbitant amounts of power and water.

        ilovepiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
        ilovepiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #217

        What about self hosting?
        I can run a local GenAI on my gaming PC with relative ease. This isn't consuming mass amounts of power.

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • H [email protected]

          AI uses 1/1000 the power of a microwave.

          Are you really sure you aren't the one being fed lies by con men?

          J This user is from outside of this forum
          J This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by [email protected]
          #218

          What? Elon Musk’s xAI data center in Tennessee (when fully expanded & operational) will need 2 GW of energy. That’s as much as some entire cities use in a year.

          B 1 Reply Last reply
          5
          • E [email protected]
            This post did not contain any content.
            M This user is from outside of this forum
            M This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #219

            Wow i'm sure this comment section is full of respectful and constructive discussion /s. Lemme go pop some popcorn.

            1 Reply Last reply
            12
            • E [email protected]

              Literally this post lol

              T This user is from outside of this forum
              T This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #220

              Doh. I'm always sorted to new, so things don't have this many votes. I should revisit every so often

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E [email protected]

                And the point of anarchist or actual communist systems is that such scale would be miniscule. Not massive national or unanswerable state scales.

                And yes, I'm an anarchist. I know DB0 and their instance and generally agree with their stance - because it would allow any one of us to effectively advocate against it if we desired to.

                There would be no tech broligarchy forcing things on anyone. They'd likely all be hanged long ago. And no one would miss them as they provide nothing of real value anyway.

                acetken@lemmy.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                acetken@lemmy.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #221

                DB0 has a rather famous record of banning users who do not agree with AI. See [email protected] or others for many threads complaining about it.

                You have no way of knowing what the scale would be as it's all a thought experiment, however, so let's play at that. if you see AI as a nearly universal good and want to encourage people to use it, why not incorporate it into things? Why not foist it into the state OS or whatever?

                Buuuuut... keep in mind that in previous Communist regimes (even if you disagree that they were "real" Communists), what the state says will apply. If the state is actively pro-AI, then by default, you are using it. Are you too good to use what your brothers and sisters have said is good and will definitely 100% save labour? Are you wasteful, Comrade? Why do you hate your country?

                E 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R [email protected]

                  And the call for violence, because it splat as it's your team* doing it.

                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #222

                  Also fixed.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • brobot9000@lemmy.worldB [email protected]

                    Do you really need to have a list of why people are sick of LLM and Ai slop?

                    Ai is literally making people dumber:

                    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/lee_2025_ai_critical_thinking_survey.pdf

                    https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/18/is_ai_changing_our_brains/

                    They are a massive privacy risk:

                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyH7zoP-JOg&t=3015s

                    https://theconversation.com/ai-tools-collect-and-store-data-about-you-from-all-your-devices-heres-how-to-be-aware-of-what-youre-revealing-251693

                    Are being used to push fascist ideologies into every aspect of the internet:

                    https://newsocialist.org.uk/transmissions/ai-the-new-aesthetics-of-fascism/

                    And they are a massive environmental disaster:

                    https://news.mit.edu/2025/explained-generative-ai-environmental-impact-0117

                    https://www.forbes.com/sites/cindygordon/2024/02/25/ai-is-accelerating-the-loss-of-our-scarcest-natural-resource-water/

                    Stop being a corporate apologist and stop wreaking the environment with this shit technology.

                    Edit: thank you to every Ai apologist outing themselves in the comments. Thank you for making blocking you easy.

                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #223

                    Lol I didn't know that the anarchists over at lemmy.dbzer0.com are being corporate apologists. /sarcasm

                    oatscoop@midwest.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • B [email protected]

                      Not all AI is bad. But there’s enough widespread AI that’s helping cut jobs, spreading misinformation (or in some cases, actual propaganda), creating deepfakes, etc, that in many people’s eyes, it paints a bad picture of AI overall. I also don’t trust AI because it’s almost exclusively owned by far right billionaires.

                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #224

                      Machines replacing people is not a bad thing if they can actually perform the same or better; the solution to unemployment would be Universal Basic Income.

                      P C P 3 Replies Last reply
                      5
                      • B [email protected]

                        Lots of pro AI astroturfing and whataboutisms in these comments... 🤢

                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #225

                        "Anyone I disagree with must be a bot or government agent"

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • E [email protected]
                          This post did not contain any content.
                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #226

                          Reminder that Lemmy is typically older and older people are usually more conservative about things. Sure, politcially, Lemmy leans left, but technologically, Lemmy is very conservative.

                          Like for example, you see people on Lemmy say they'll switch to a dumbphone, but that's probably even more insecure, and they could've just used Lineage OS or something and it would be far more private.

                          D 1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • D [email protected]

                            Machines replacing people is not a bad thing if they can actually perform the same or better; the solution to unemployment would be Universal Basic Income.

                            P This user is from outside of this forum
                            P This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #227

                            For labor people don't like doing, sure. I can't imagine replacing a friend of mine with a conversation machine that performs the same or better, though.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            5
                            • M [email protected]

                              I firmly believe we won't get most of the interesting, "good" AI until after this current AI bubble bursts and goes down in flames. Once AI hardware is cheap interesting people will use it to make cool things. But right now, the big players in the space are drowning out anyone who might do real AI work that has potential, by throwing more and more hardware and money at LLMs and generative AI models because they don't understand the technology and see it as a way to get rich and powerful quickly.

                              N This user is from outside of this forum
                              N This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #228

                              AI is good and cheap now because businesses are funding it at a loss, so not sure what you mean here.

                              The problem is that it's cheap, so that anyone can make whatever they want and most people make low quality slop, hence why it's not "good" in your eyes.

                              Making a cheap or efficient AI doesn't help the end user in any way.

                              S M 2 Replies Last reply
                              5
                              • rushlana@lemmy.blahaj.zoneR [email protected]

                                How people dare not like the automatic bullshit machine pushed down their troat...

                                Seriously, genrative AI acomplishment are :

                                • Making mass spam easier
                                • Burning the planet
                                • Making people lose their job and not even being a decent solution
                                • Make all search engine and information sources worse
                                • Creating an economic bubble that will fuckup the economy even harder
                                • Easing mass surveillance and weakening privacy everywhere
                                D This user is from outside of this forum
                                D This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #229

                                We should ban computers since they are making mass surveillance easier. /s

                                rushlana@lemmy.blahaj.zoneR 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • V [email protected]

                                  So cancer cell detection is now bad and those doing it should feel bad?

                                  The world isn't black'n white.

                                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #230

                                  Me to burn victims: "You know, without fire, we couldn't grill meat. Right? You should think more about what you say."

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • S [email protected]

                                    Would love an explanation on how I'm in the wrong on reducing my work week from 40 hours to 15 using AI.

                                    Existing in predatory capitalistic system and putting the blame on those who utilize available tools to reduce the predatory nature of our system is insane.

                                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #231

                                    Because when your employer catches on, they'll bring you back up to 40 anyway.

                                    And probably because those 15 hours now produce shit quality.

                                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • D [email protected]

                                      Reminder that Lemmy is typically older and older people are usually more conservative about things. Sure, politcially, Lemmy leans left, but technologically, Lemmy is very conservative.

                                      Like for example, you see people on Lemmy say they'll switch to a dumbphone, but that's probably even more insecure, and they could've just used Lineage OS or something and it would be far more private.

                                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #232

                                      Why does being progressive and into tech mean being into ai all of a sudden? It has never meant that, its the conservative mfs pushing ai for a reason. You think any sort of powerful ai is about to be open source and usable by the ppl? Not expensive af to run with hella regulations behind who can use it?

                                      D B 2 Replies Last reply
                                      13
                                      • D [email protected]

                                        Why does being progressive and into tech mean being into ai all of a sudden? It has never meant that, its the conservative mfs pushing ai for a reason. You think any sort of powerful ai is about to be open source and usable by the ppl? Not expensive af to run with hella regulations behind who can use it?

                                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #233

                                        Im progressive and in to tech, I dont like fking generative ai tho its the worst part of tech to me, ai can be great in the medical field, It can be great as a supplementary tool but mfs dont use it that way. They just wanna sit on their asses and get rich off other ppls work

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        6
                                        • R [email protected]

                                          Stop drinking the cool aid bro. Think of these statements critically for a second. Environmental harm? Sure. I hope you're a vegan as well.

                                          Loss of media literacy: What does this even mean? People are doing things the easy way instead of the hard way? Yes, of course cutting corners is bad, but the problem is the conditions that lead to that person choosing to cut corners, the problem is the demand for maximum efficiency at any cost, for top numbers. AI is is making a problem evident, not causing it. If you're home on a Friday after your second shift of the day, fuck yeah you want to do things easy and fast. Literacy what? Just let me watch something funny.

                                          Do you feel you've become more stupid? Do you think it's possible? Why wouild other people, who are just like you, be these puppets to be brain washed by the evil machine?

                                          Ask yourself. How are people measuring intelligence? Creativity? How many people were in these studies and who funded them?
                                          If we had the measuring instrument needed to actually make categorizations like "People are losing intelligence." Psychologists wouldn't still be arguing over the exact definition of intelligence.

                                          Stop thinking of AI as a boogieman inside people's heads. It is a machine. People using the machine to achieve a mundane goal, it doesn't mean the machine created the goal or is responsible for everything wrong with humanity.

                                          Huge increase in inequality? What? Brother AI is a machine. It is the robber barons that are exploiting you and all of the working class to get obsenely rich. AI is the tool they're using. AI can't be held accountable. AI has no will. AI is a tool. It is people that are increasing inequality. It is the system held in place by these people that rewards exploitation and encourages to look at the evil machine instead. And don't even use it, the less you know, the better. If you never engage with AI technology, you'll believe everything I say about how evil it is.

                                          P This user is from outside of this forum
                                          P This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #234

                                          Literacy what? Just let me watch something funny.

                                          This is like the most pro-illiteracy thing I've ever read.

                                          Do you feel you've become more stupid?

                                          My muscles were weaker until I started training. As it turns out, the modern convenience that allows me to sit around all day doesn't actually make me stronger by itself.

                                          It is people that are increasing inequality.

                                          Yes, what if the billionaires simply chose not to, hm? Have I ever thought of that? Probably not, I'm very stupid.

                                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups