What do you call your production branch?

[drunkanroot@sh.itjust.works]

smirnoffcarkeysandabeer

[midnitte@beehaw.org]

Feel like lawful evil fits better for master

[pohart@programming.dev]

qa.

All development happens in feature branches. Someone other than the original developer needs to build and test the feature on our development servers. If successful it gets merged into qa, where it gets built and tested against it qa servers. Production build are tags on qa.

[nigelfrobisher@aussie.zone]

Moab is “mouth over anus & balls”.

[neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works]

Develop should be Chaotic Evil.

[roanutil_@programming.dev]

This is what is used where I work. I have never and will never understand why.

[rusty@lemmy.ca]

Conflict resolution only through melee combat.

Wrestle with Jeff, Prepare for death.

[hellfire103@lemmy.ca]

Even better

[cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone]

Used to be daddy but we don't talk about that, she's much happier post-transition

[ghen@sh.itjust.works]

At some point in the past that was the only way to make the business run immediately when the boss said it needed to run immediately, and it's been that way ever since

[zombifrancis@sh.itjust.works]

"Untitled"

[skybreakerengineer@lemmy.world]

Yall have multiple branches?

[ronigami@lemmy.world]

(empty string)

[xthexder@l.sw0.com]

Untitled-project2_final_fixed-3.zip

[dosuser123456@programming.dev]

branch (i always commit directly to the main branch so i only have one, so why bother naming it. also YOU CANT STOP ME FROM DOING IT BWAHAHAHAHAHA)

[mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org]

I’m using shenanigans now, fits the best methinks.