The duality of man
-
Edit: Replied at wrong level
Edit 2: Restored image, because someone responded/commented.
Let's put it over there with the rest of the fire.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Republican today should say “four, and let’s bomb the Middle East twice!”
-
This post did not contain any content.
The West was bombing the Middle East 100 years ago too, though.
-
Republican today should say “four, and let’s bomb the Middle East twice!”
"The Middle East and South America".
-
Republican today should say “four, and let’s bomb the Middle East twice!”
Seriously. Tired of folks trying to act like they’re on the same level of shitiness. Magats are in a league of their own.
-
"The Middle East and South America".
Chiquita Banana says hi!
-
The West was bombing the Middle East 100 years ago too, though.
wrote last edited by [email protected]Tf is “the West”? Who specifically? I don’t remember any chapter in the US where we bombed the shit out of the ME in the 1920s.
Sick to death of braindead leftist comments talking about “the West” like wtf are you even saying? Also sick to death of “the East” and the Middle East being portrayed as helpless victims. The Ottomans would like a word.
Go earn your “I hate america I hate The West” brownie points on reddit and tumblr.
-
Seriously. Tired of folks trying to act like they’re on the same level of shitiness. Magats are in a league of their own.
It really is fascinating just how stupid it can get
-
Tf is “the West”? Who specifically? I don’t remember any chapter in the US where we bombed the shit out of the ME in the 1920s.
Sick to death of braindead leftist comments talking about “the West” like wtf are you even saying? Also sick to death of “the East” and the Middle East being portrayed as helpless victims. The Ottomans would like a word.
Go earn your “I hate america I hate The West” brownie points on reddit and tumblr.
wrote last edited by [email protected]Well, America wasn't America yet exactly 100 years ago (being a young country and all), and the deaths and overall instability in the region took place mostly through the British and the French, fair enough, but I feel like they more than made up for it:
Also, it's just the internal balance of power that has changed over the years, not the identity or objectives of the bloc.
-
Well, America wasn't America yet exactly 100 years ago (being a young country and all), and the deaths and overall instability in the region took place mostly through the British and the French, fair enough, but I feel like they more than made up for it:
Also, it's just the internal balance of power that has changed over the years, not the identity or objectives of the bloc.
Well, America wasn't America yet exactly 100 years ago (being a young country and all)
Huh? What are you talking about?
-
The West was bombing the Middle East 100 years ago too, though.
People love to idealize the past...
-
Tf is “the West”? Who specifically? I don’t remember any chapter in the US where we bombed the shit out of the ME in the 1920s.
Sick to death of braindead leftist comments talking about “the West” like wtf are you even saying? Also sick to death of “the East” and the Middle East being portrayed as helpless victims. The Ottomans would like a word.
Go earn your “I hate america I hate The West” brownie points on reddit and tumblr.
"The West" is Europe and its colonies. Funny to assume anyone you don't understand is brain dead.
-
The West was bombing the Middle East 100 years ago too, though.
They didn't invent bombs back then only rocks and sharp sticks.
-
Republican today should say “four, and let’s bomb the Middle East twice!”
Don't forget that they also want to execute anyone who's trans.
-
This post did not contain any content.
This is propaganda enabling the far right to win future elections.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
imagine having a 2 party system.
(said the dude living in a country where every but one party are right - far right)
-
Well, America wasn't America yet exactly 100 years ago (being a young country and all)
Huh? What are you talking about?
In the context of aggressive foreign policy where we bomb the shit out of people... They are probably referring to how in the 1910s USA was stumbling through an incursion into Mexico to fight rebels / raiders. As we joined WW1, some saw us as a rowdy militia, like cowboys. We had to borrow materiel because we weren't yet a proper war-machine like European countries were. Exactly 100 years ago that wasn't the case though. Yet there would still be quite a ways to go until the era of "top 3 air forces" and super carriers patrolling the globe while drones blow 'terrorists' to smithereens.
-
Seriously. Tired of folks trying to act like they’re on the same level of shitiness. Magats are in a league of their own.
Accepting either presented level of shittiness is what got us here in the first place.
Trump couldn't have done it without Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden or Kamala Harris. The House Reps would struggle more, if it wasn't for people like Schumer. If Democrats had called out AIPAC over the past twenty years instead of drooling over the opportunity to aid and abet war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide for them, we'd never had the whole "yeah i am voting for the slow genocide" argumentation being somehow "acceptable".
And the most important thing is that the current Democrats are not going to be a driver for positive change. They are still fighting against moderate progressives like Mamdani and pushing for neoliberal reactionaries like Newsom instead.
-
Accepting either presented level of shittiness is what got us here in the first place.
Trump couldn't have done it without Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden or Kamala Harris. The House Reps would struggle more, if it wasn't for people like Schumer. If Democrats had called out AIPAC over the past twenty years instead of drooling over the opportunity to aid and abet war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide for them, we'd never had the whole "yeah i am voting for the slow genocide" argumentation being somehow "acceptable".
And the most important thing is that the current Democrats are not going to be a driver for positive change. They are still fighting against moderate progressives like Mamdani and pushing for neoliberal reactionaries like Newsom instead.
Maybe, but they're not helping Republicans as much as people like you
-
This post did not contain any content.
The democrat would be too scared of their own shadow to even leave their house
