do you think we are going into ww3?
-
A [email protected] shared this topic
-
Probably. Too many hot spots in the world right now where a minor mistake can result in a chain reaction.
-
Da, comrade
-
Depending on how you define it, it may have already happened. WW1 was mostly just Europe.
-
-
-
-
Well, I'm not going to jinx it, am I?
-
-
-
Maximum profit is extracted being in a perpetual state of "will they/won't they WWIII" which is why we'll be right here in this mood for a long time..
-
-
Ww3 is too high risk due to nukes, but it will get to that point and hopefully not over it
-
We've been in it for decades it's just more covert and low intensity. The war never stops until we overthrow capitalism I'm afraid
-
I feel like we're already in WW3 but everyone has to pretend we're not to avoid escalating it to nuclear.
-
Mmm if Iran and Israel really start to go at it, I could absolutely imagine Trump finding a way to use nukes on Iran. He wants to use the nukes.
-
It's possible none of those would technically be WW3 by itself, perhaps the start of heavier US commitment in the first of those conflicts might be perceived as the opportunity for the others to get started. Maybe even some less obvious conflicts are merely waiting for NATO to be preoccupied (e.g. random colonies being invaded or declaring independence). The US will be forced into taking at least one L, or switching back to a war economy.
- India vs Pakistan
- ISIS expansion
- Water Wars (multiple locations)
- USA invading Mexico
- Syrian Civil War
- Greenland War
- IDK if Denmark can defend Greenland, but NATO could article5/split
-
India vs Pakistan
not plausible, neither of them are that stupid
Afghanistan vs. Pakistan, or Iran, is infinitely more likely. Pashtun supremacists (yea the Taliban) are actually stupid af
-
Already there
