Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. World News
  3. US to withdraw from NATO under Republican bill

US to withdraw from NATO under Republican bill

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved World News
world
346 Posts 186 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A [email protected]

    The US is great at spending money in the military, but it absolutely sucks at actual war.

    Look how they wasted trillions in Afghanistan to surrender to the Taliban.

    the US military exists solely to funnel tax payer money to military shareholders.

    B This user is from outside of this forum
    B This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #96

    That was to funnel money, steal gold, and oil.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • F [email protected]
      This post did not contain any content.
      Y This user is from outside of this forum
      Y This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #97

      The press I saw from nato meet where really disturbing as in they where blatantly sucking up on him.. so maybe there was something known already. Also the Iran stunt is incredible, what is happening?

      1 Reply Last reply
      5
      • eyekaytee@aussie.zoneE [email protected]

        france was right all along

        I This user is from outside of this forum
        I This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #98

        Yes, but what's the point? Nobody listens to France anyway, we are irrelevant. The only way to push our ideas is if somehow the EU embrace them.

        And then we've got our own issues (doing nothing climate-related, lack of financing for science, nazi ideas getting popular, etc...).

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A [email protected]

          The US is great at spending money in the military, but it absolutely sucks at actual war.

          Look how they wasted trillions in Afghanistan to surrender to the Taliban.

          the US military exists solely to funnel tax payer money to military shareholders.

          rickyrigatoni@retrolemmy.comR This user is from outside of this forum
          rickyrigatoni@retrolemmy.comR This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #99

          Yeah but we won the war om werewolves.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • B [email protected]

            Why do you think that? How would losing half the military assets and technology would benefit NATO?

            W This user is from outside of this forum
            W This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #100

            Half the military and technology assets that won't ever actually be used to help NATO under Trump.

            He'll veto every action that goes against Russia... Which is what NATO was originally formed to do...

            B L B 3 Replies Last reply
            25
            • B [email protected]

              That was to funnel money, steal gold, and oil.

              A This user is from outside of this forum
              A This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #101

              in a way, the "mission accomplished" was true

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • P [email protected]

                He's an officer and over 20 years now. This discussion took place shortly after he gave me a tour of the bridge of the carrier he was assigned to at the time. The terminals were running Windows XP. This was 7-8 years ago tops.

                G This user is from outside of this forum
                G This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #102

                ah, so you're full of shit and know nothing.

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F [email protected]
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  K This user is from outside of this forum
                  K This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #103

                  He's just stirring shit to get his name out there isn't he?

                  W 1 Reply Last reply
                  18
                  • F [email protected]
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    almacca@aussie.zoneA This user is from outside of this forum
                    almacca@aussie.zoneA This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #104

                    Australia really needs to close Pine Gap as well.

                    F 1 Reply Last reply
                    5
                    • F [email protected]

                      China might have a 2 year window coming up where it's even possible to invade Taiwan. Their military has modernized a lot, but they probably aren't quite to the point of being able to pull it off. At the same time, they are looking at a demographic cliff from the long term implications of the One Child policy.

                      It's possible this window as already closed. That said, authoritarian regimes have started wars before that were terrible ideas.

                      spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                      spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #105

                      Yeah with how effective drones have been in Ukraine (especially in hitting the Russian Navy) I kinda doubt they'll have the capability. I feel like Taiwan is probably developing the capability to mass produce drones right now. They most definitely have the technology. Amphibious invasions are really hard to pull off, and China doesn't have a lot of naval experience. And nobody has ever done it with a thousand drone boats in the water.

                      And yup, authoritarians do stupid things with their military, we saw that already with Putin's invasion of Ukraine. So the question is, how stupid is Xi Jinping? I guess we'll have to wait and see.

                      D 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • K [email protected]

                        He's just stirring shit to get his name out there isn't he?

                        W This user is from outside of this forum
                        W This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #106

                        Utahns generally don't like to draw attention to themselves as firebrands (e.g. Mitt Romney, Orrin Hatch), so methinks the Senator is planning to get into the 2028 presidential primary.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        15
                        • A [email protected]

                          The US is great at spending money in the military, but it absolutely sucks at actual war.

                          Look how they wasted trillions in Afghanistan to surrender to the Taliban.

                          the US military exists solely to funnel tax payer money to military shareholders.

                          L This user is from outside of this forum
                          L This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #107

                          Actually, if you're curious, look up how many wars the US has actually outright won on their own without being part of a coalition of allies.

                          The answer is shockingly few.

                          Even their great revolution needed help from an, at the time, true superpower i.e. the French.

                          A 1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • L [email protected]

                            Actually, if you're curious, look up how many wars the US has actually outright won on their own without being part of a coalition of allies.

                            The answer is shockingly few.

                            Even their great revolution needed help from an, at the time, true superpower i.e. the French.

                            A This user is from outside of this forum
                            A This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #108

                            checked a wiki page about that.

                            it's frankly embarrassing how much the US military actually sucks.

                            likely human history most expensive military, and a complete waste of resources

                            G 1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • witchfire@lemmy.worldW [email protected]

                              Honestly, NATO might be better off without them

                              D This user is from outside of this forum
                              D This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #109

                              Agreed. Drumpf is Pootins "man"*on the inside. Look to him to delay and prevaricate any NATO decision, and generally try to sabotage them

                              • Drumph is NOT a man. He's a cowardly little orange shit weasel.
                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              8
                              • R [email protected]

                                I keep getting this sinking feeling that this is all leading up to a precise and coordinated attack of evil.

                                Russia bombards the EU, the US attacks Greenland and Canada, while Israel finally bulldozes Gaza and Iran. China takes Taiwan and the south sea.

                                All at the same time so NATO is overwhelmed and can’t decisively defend it all without risking spreading too thin. No matter what happens, one of the bad guys gains ground.

                                I honestly have no idea if this is even possible, it’s based on a dream I had a few weeks ago.

                                Disturbing thought though.

                                A This user is from outside of this forum
                                A This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #110

                                Wait, "attack of evil"? The US is literally funding and arming the genocide in Gaza, the US IS the greatest evil. You may argue for Russia being a close second (discounting Israel), but how is the US not absolutely the worst by any metric? How many millions did it murder in Vietnam, Iraq, Korea, and how many millions more were murdered under its approval in Southeast Asia(Suharto) or Latin America (Pinochet)?

                                R 1 Reply Last reply
                                3
                                • B [email protected]

                                  The 5% is probably too much, but its realistically 3.5% the othet 1.5% can be spend on infrastructure (like make bridges strong enough so tanks can drive over them), on cyber defense and other things that are not weapons.

                                  Also it's about deterrence, when we spend enough Russia can't attack unless they match the spending, this is part why the Soviet Union collapsed.

                                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                                  #111

                                  The Soviet Union collapsing is what allowed the war in Ukraine. Do you see why rising military budgets in Europe doesn't exactly promote peace?

                                  D B 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • H [email protected]

                                    Look how stupid your country is, to hand the death of NATO to Putin because you’re on his side.

                                    Thanks for the war and death and heat, Americans.

                                    Fuck you.

                                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #112

                                    The death of NATO is a good fucking thing. No more US military bases in the EU, no more forced expenditure of civil budget in weapons causing austerity, no more bombing of Libya and Yugoslavia, no more US influence in European politics. If you're European you should salivate at the thought of NATO ending.

                                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                                    6
                                    • P [email protected]

                                      Israel might bulldoze Gaza and maybe a few Mashriq countries, but it would suffocate on Iran. That's a fucking big country.

                                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #113

                                      17th biggest in the world. I was surprised when I learned that.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • W [email protected]

                                        It really sounds like you cowards are holding REALLY tightly to the same talking points- so fucking desperate not to face your inadequacy and complete lack of spine. It’s gross, honestly.

                                        Guess what, you’re not “one of the good ones.”

                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                                        #114

                                        My word Brotha… just breathe. I know you darn good well if you really, really look deep in the center of it all. I mean like seriously look deep, you and I know who really is at fault. Is it really the common folks and citizens of America? Is it really those individuals who make barely enough to get a meal on their desk, because most of the paycheck goes to rent, house payments, bills and the unnecessary bs insurances? Bro the inflation is so bad that it’s not us. It’s the elites with insane amount of wealth. Plus most of us hate every part of the leadership that runs this country. How is it the common folk’s fault when you know damn good and well that it’s the crazy orange men. And I guess that justifies my statement in saying that, “Guess what bro, you are not the good ones either.”

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        5
                                        • anunusualrelic@lemmy.worldA [email protected]

                                          They want out because it's stopping to be a market for the US military industries, as Europe increasingly wants to spend domestically. As such, it now has very little interest.

                                          US: We want you to spend more on defence!
                                          Europe: Ok, we will buy more, from our own companies!
                                          US: That's not what I meant! I'm going home!

                                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #115

                                          They want out because it’s stopping to be a market for the US military industries, as Europe increasingly wants to spend domestically. As such, it now has very little interest.

                                          This is only happening because Drumpf is meddling with deliveries and contracts. It makes America an unreliable supplier and partner when a contract or agreement means nothing because the orange shiteweasel may change his mind tomorrow, and redirect the arms that you already paid for......

                                          W 1 Reply Last reply
                                          10
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups